Collabs should be easier to make in my opinion. Maybe Scratch should make a collab.scratch.mit.edu page where someone uploads a project and invites other Scratch members to join their collab (collab creator decides whether the collab is invitation only, invitation or request only, or free to all).
Then they upload the base project. Other members upload projects, and some build on to the main project... but they build it ONLINE, and update it in realtime.
Also, the collab would have it's own chat room with instant chat and a forum for members to use their favorite way to talk about what features the project needs. The collab creator chooses whether it's a chat box, forum, or both. The collab creator would also choose whether outsiders (people who aren't members) can view the chat room or not. And if outsiders can, the collab creator would choose whether they can post or not.
Plus, the collab would have a news page where they can post updates and stuff. The collab creator would choose if all member can post, only designated people, or only admins.
Admins are special people that the collab creator chooses, that can do anything the collab creator can, except decide whether there are admins or not. The collab creator can disable the admins feature.
That way, all the members can get together, update the main project with ease, share their ideas, and build greater projects!
The Scratch Team would feature certain collabs. When you go to a collab page, the main project loads. There is a list of other projects to the side. When you click one, you go to another page... it's like the normal project page. To comment, you have to go to the main projects page by clicking the title.
The collab creator may change the main project at any time. Also, there is a poll that the collab creator can change at any time. The collab creator would choose whether the poll is for collab members only, or for everyone. The poll would have it's own page.
Here's a mockup I made.
On a scale of 0 - 10 (10 being great), what do you rate my idea? Please vote! Thanks!
Offline
meew0 wrote:
9.5/10
Your mockup doesn't look good.
You made the rating lower because a mockup doesn't look good?! So you're saying it's a bad idea because I can't draw??? I never asked for my mockup to be rated. >.<
Offline
Catwalk923 wrote:
meew0 wrote:
9.5/10
Your mockup doesn't look good.You made the rating lower because a mockup doesn't look good?! So you're saying it's a bad idea because I can't draw??? I never asked for my mockup to be rated. >.<
The mockup didn't affect the score. I rated your idea 9.5/10 and then said the mockup doesn't look good.
Offline
meew0 wrote:
9.5/10
Your mockup doesn't look good.
Offline
meew0 wrote:
Catwalk923 wrote:
meew0 wrote:
9.5/10
Your mockup doesn't look good.You made the rating lower because a mockup doesn't look good?! So you're saying it's a bad idea because I can't draw??? I never asked for my mockup to be rated. >.<
The mockup didn't affect the score. I rated your idea 9.5/10 and then said the mockup doesn't look good.
![]()
Ahhhhh... what should be changed?
Offline
Catwalk923 wrote:
meew0 wrote:
Catwalk923 wrote:
You made the rating lower because a mockup doesn't look good?! So you're saying it's a bad idea because I can't draw??? I never asked for my mockup to be rated. >.<The mockup didn't affect the score. I rated your idea 9.5/10 and then said the mockup doesn't look good.
![]()
Ahhhhh... what should be changed?
![]()
It's a bit messy IMO.
Offline
Earthboundjeff wrote:
10. Your mockup is fine.
Thanks.
Last edited by Catwalk923 (2011-06-06 13:41:45)
Offline
scimonster wrote:
Catwalk923 wrote:
meew0 wrote:
The mockup didn't affect the score. I rated your idea 9.5/10 and then said the mockup doesn't look good.![]()
Ahhhhh... what should be changed?
![]()
It's a bit messy IMO.
What's messy?
Offline
Catwalk923 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Catwalk923 wrote:
Ahhhhh... what should be changed?![]()
It's a bit messy IMO.
What's messy?
![]()
Well, it's not so clear, but
Lightnin wrote:
Mockups are "quick and dirty," which means they don't take a lot of time to make, and they aren't polished. Polishing will come later if the design team decides it wants to use the design proposed in the mockup.
ılıll|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|̲̅̅=̲̅̅|̲̅̅●̲̅̅|llılı <-- awesomeness.
Offline
Catwalk923 wrote:
meew0 wrote:
Catwalk923 wrote:
You made the rating lower because a mockup doesn't look good?! So you're saying it's a bad idea because I can't draw??? I never asked for my mockup to be rated. >.<
The mockup didn't affect the score. I rated your idea 9.5/10 and then said the mockup doesn't look good.
![]()
Ahhhhh... what should be changed?
![]()
The font doesn't look good.
Offline
9.5/10
Offline
10/10.
By the way, there shouldn't be a "Subscribe" link on the project page...
Offline
9.9/10
.1 removed for chat
Offline
Wait. I afraid that some people would just make a "collab" to use the "chat room"...
Offline
mathematics wrote:
Wait. I afraid that some people would just make a "collab" to use the "chat room"...
That was my concern. That's why I think we shouldn't have the 'chatroom'. However, everything else sounded fine. Not one thing was wrong, i didn't think.
Offline