Scratch

Rexpup · 2011-06-01 20:47:12

Here, I found some info on Scratch 0.2, and there were some interesting images...
Firstly, This looks like this is the "create your own block" that will be in Scratch 2.0, so this used to be in Scratch...
Again, this picture looks like the new upcoming feature.
this is the "repeat until broadcasted" block that so many people have asked for... I wonder why it was removed...

jslomba · 2011-06-01 20:54:18

woah!

Harakou · 2011-06-01 20:58:30

Wait, you could create custom methods in a previous version (perhaps alpha or beta) of Scratch? I wonder why such a good feature would be removed?

rdococ · 2011-06-02 07:57:03

Harakou, it was a version of the broadcasts I think.

mathematics · 2011-06-02 08:33:22

Wow... I've these pictures before but I've never thought that they are similar to some of the features in Scratch 2.0!

Last edited by mathematics (2011-06-02 08:33:44)

scimonster · 2011-06-02 08:48:25

mathematics wrote:
Wow... I've these pictures before but I've never thought that they are similar to some of the features in Scratch 2.0!

+1, though I thought it's from 0.1.

veggieman001 · 2011-06-02 10:25:46

scimonster wrote:
mathematics wrote:
Wow... I've these pictures before but I've never thought that they are similar to some of the features in Scratch 2.0!
+1, though I thought it's from 0.1.

the paper says it is 0.1

rdococ · 2011-06-02 10:28:22

I thought it was from 0.1 too.
I thought the grey one with a bigger screen could be 0.0.1.

veggieman001 · 2011-06-02 10:52:57

rdococ wrote:
I thought it was from 0.1 too.
I thought the grey one with a bigger screen could be 0.0.1.

or it could be a greyscale screenshot of 0.1

Magnie · 2011-06-02 15:33:27

Yeah, I don't see anywhere, where it says "This is being implemented into 2.0".

Harakou · 2011-06-02 18:04:11

Magnie wrote:
Yeah, I don't see anywhere, where it says "This is being implemented into 2.0".

The "create your own block" feature mentioned first is going into Scratch 2.0 though. http://suggest.scratch.mit.edu/forums/6 … ?ref=title

Rexpup never suggested that the the "repeat until broadcast ___" block would be in Scratch 2.0 either, only that a lot of people have been clamoring for it.

bbbeb · 2011-06-02 19:13:48

....or this could be photoshopped tomfoolery.

We may never know....

jslomba · 2011-06-02 19:39:56

bbbeb wrote:
....or this could be photoshopped tomfoolery.

We may never know....

tomfollery?

ihaveamac · 2011-06-02 19:49:33

Rexpup wrote:
Here, I found some info on Scratch 0.2, and there were some interesting images...

Um...Scratch 0.2 never came out. xD

Anyway, you're saying Scratch 2 will have some of the old features that the very old version of Scratch had?

bbbeb · 2011-06-02 19:55:28

jslomba wrote:
bbbeb wrote:
....or this could be photoshopped tomfoolery.

We may never know....
tomfollery?

Tomfoolery

The act of doing something so dumb that no one noticed it was dumb except for the people who actually noticed.

Magnie · 2011-06-04 09:20:50

Harakou wrote:
Magnie wrote:
Yeah, I don't see anywhere, where it says "This is being implemented into 2.0".
The "create your own block" feature mentioned first is going into Scratch 2.0 though. http://suggest.scratch.mit.edu/forums/6 … ?ref=title

Rexpup never suggested that the the "repeat until broadcast ___" block would be in Scratch 2.0 either, only that a lot of people have been clamoring for it.

Oh, I didn't see the block linked to the other script. Thanks for clearing that up. smile

jslomba · 2011-06-04 09:30:03

bbbeb wrote:
jslomba wrote:
bbbeb wrote:
....or this could be photoshopped tomfoolery.

We may never know....
tomfollery?
Tomfoolery

The act of doing something so dumb that no one noticed it was dumb except for the people who actually noticed.

oh.

Rexpup · 2011-06-04 17:10:55

bbbeb wrote:
....or this could be photoshopped tomfoolery.

We may never know....

No, It's real. Check the Nerd level of the paper.

Harakou wrote:
Rexpup never suggested that the the "repeat until broadcast ___" block would be in Scratch 2.0 either, only that a lot of people have been clamoring for it.

You're right, I did not say that about the second one.

veggieman001 wrote:
rdococ wrote:
I thought it was from 0.1 too.
I thought the grey one with a bigger screen could be 0.0.1.
or it could be a greyscale screenshot of 0.1

Yeah, I think that it was made to be printed on a laser printer or something...

ihaveamac wrote:
Rexpup wrote:
Here, I found some info on Scratch 0.2, and there were some interesting images...
Um...Scratch 0.2 never came out. xD

Anyway, you're saying Scratch 2 will have some of the old features that the very old version of Scratch had?

I think...

colorfusion · 2011-06-05 15:43:35

Awesome find!
I find it funny how the writing is all serious and complex and then the images are of cats spinning around and "Mr.Crazy" or a quick doodle of a smiling face.

Rexpup · 2011-06-05 15:48:51

colorfusion wrote:
Awesome find!
I find it funny how the writing is all serious and complex and then the images are of cats spinning around and "Mr.Crazy" or a quick doodle of a smiling face.

Yeah, it is. smile

nuckelavee · 2011-06-05 21:11:44

Wow. O.o

LS97 · 2011-06-20 06:36:56

I read the whole thing, and I found it really interesting.

Now I understand where the shoutGo and the forward: methods came from!

I find it ironic how they started with nothing, made all these new awesome features like procedures and flags and mail, and then decided it was all useless and resorted to string broadcasts tongue

scimonster · 2011-06-20 06:41:20

LS97 wrote:
Now I understand where the shoutGo and the forward: methods came from!

I never thought about it like that! But you're right.

Rexpup · 2011-06-20 12:18:21

LS97 wrote:
I find it ironic how they started with nothing, made all these new awesome features like procedures and flags and mail, and then decided it was all useless and resorted to string broadcasts

Yeah, really. I think that it look a bit too complex for children at the time. Which it was.

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-06-01 20:47:12

Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#2 2011-06-01 20:54:18

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#3 2011-06-01 20:58:30

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#4 2011-06-02 07:57:03

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#5 2011-06-02 08:33:22

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#6 2011-06-02 08:48:25

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

mathematics wrote:

#7 2011-06-02 10:25:46

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

scimonster wrote:

mathematics wrote:

#8 2011-06-02 10:28:22

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#9 2011-06-02 10:52:57

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

rdococ wrote:

#10 2011-06-02 15:33:27

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#11 2011-06-02 18:04:11

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

Magnie wrote:

#12 2011-06-02 19:13:48

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#13 2011-06-02 19:39:56

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

bbbeb wrote:

#14 2011-06-02 19:49:33

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

Rexpup wrote:

#15 2011-06-02 19:55:28

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

jslomba wrote:

bbbeb wrote:

#16 2011-06-04 09:20:50

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

Harakou wrote:

Magnie wrote:

#17 2011-06-04 09:30:03

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

bbbeb wrote:

jslomba wrote:

bbbeb wrote:

#18 2011-06-04 17:10:55

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

bbbeb wrote:

Harakou wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

rdococ wrote:

ihaveamac wrote:

Rexpup wrote:

#19 2011-06-05 15:43:35

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#20 2011-06-05 15:48:51

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

colorfusion wrote:

#21 2011-06-05 21:11:44

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#22 2011-06-20 06:36:56

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

#23 2011-06-20 06:41:20

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

LS97 wrote:

#24 2011-06-20 12:18:21

Re: Whoa... 2.0 is resurrecting some old features...

LS97 wrote:

Board footer