Behold, my first Requests thread ;D
So, I thought that you guys might want a 'This is TDD's fault' icon
You can use it as your icon or as a picture for your sig
Join the fad, and I'll make more soon ^^
[img]http://scratch.mit.edu/static/icons/buddy/592082_med.png?t=2011-05-29+08%3A53%3A02[/img
[img]http://scratch.mit.edu/static/icons/buddy/689950_med.png?t=2011-05-29+09%3A17%3A13[/img]
[img]http://scratch.mit.edu/static/icons/buddy/719671_med.png?t=2011-05-29+09%3A31%3A01[/img]
[img]http://scratch.mit.edu/static/icons/buddy/771958_med.png?t=2011-05-30+07%3A18%3A04[/img]
Sorry, I can't upload to an image hosting site, if you want, save it and upload yourself - just in case I change my icon.
Let me know if you're using it, and if you want a certain background image for the icon.
Any requests for 'This is TDD's fault' sigs?
Or icons?
Last edited by The_Dancing_Donut (2011-05-30 07:26:07)
Offline
I'm using a block representation of the line I had put:
Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-29 09:00:48)
Offline
scimonster wrote:
I'm using a block representation of the line I had put:
http://i.imgur.com/bgeD8.gif
Lol xD I can make those too, but I'm focusing on images for icons.
Want anything?
Just completed another, using my other accounts to 'host' the images XD
Offline
Bump Bump
Bump Bump
Bump Bump
Bump Bump
Bump Bump
Bump
Offline
hdarken wrote:
I think this my sig is fine with just this.
Ok It'd robably get cut off anyway by the new sig dimension reules -.-
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
hdarken wrote:
I think this my sig is fine with just this.Ok It'd robably get cut off anyway by the new sig dimension reules -.-
new?
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
hdarken wrote:
I think this my sig is fine with just this.Ok It'd robably get cut off anyway by the new sig dimension reules -.-
new?
Yes.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
hdarken wrote:
I think this my sig is fine with just this.Ok It'd robably get cut off anyway by the new sig dimension reules -.-
new?
Yes - look at your sig - it's had the text cut off If your replace the snow picture with one of these icons, you can keep the text - it's under the limit, then
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Ok It'd robably get cut off anyway by the new sig dimension reules -.-new?
Yes - look at your sig - it's had the text cut off If your replace the snow picture with one of these icons, you can keep the text - it's under the limit, then
That wasn't snow, it was a fault line. Because it was your fault (line).
However, it looks perfectly fine to me.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
new?Yes - look at your sig - it's had the text cut off If your replace the snow picture with one of these icons, you can keep the text - it's under the limit, then
That wasn't snow, it was a fault line. Because it was your fault (line).
However, it looks perfectly fine to me.
Ohhh yeah! XD
Lol, I get it
And the text underneath it is cut off, as it exceeds 150px...
All I can see (running on IE7) is the fault line and the top of the smiley
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yes - look at your sig - it's had the text cut off If your replace the snow picture with one of these icons, you can keep the text - it's under the limit, thenThat wasn't snow, it was a fault line. Because it was your fault (line).
However, it looks perfectly fine to me.Ohhh yeah! XD
Lol, I get it
And the text underneath it is cut off, as it exceeds 150px...
All I can see (running on IE7) is the fault line and the top of the smiley
It looks fine to me.
Here's a riddle:
Sigs are cut off after 150pixels, somebody had a signature that exceeded this maximum and it was cutoff. Someone insisted that it was, but the owner of the signature said it was perfectly fine. Why?
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
That wasn't snow, it was a fault line. Because it was your fault (line).
However, it looks perfectly fine to me.Ohhh yeah! XD
Lol, I get it
And the text underneath it is cut off, as it exceeds 150px...
All I can see (running on IE7) is the fault line and the top of the smileyIt looks fine to me.
Here's a riddle:
Sigs are cut off after 150pixels, somebody had a signature that exceeded this maximum and it was cutoff. Someone insisted that it was, but the owner of the signature said it was perfectly fine. Why?
It had an image and he had images in sigs disabled.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Ohhh yeah! XD
Lol, I get it
And the text underneath it is cut off, as it exceeds 150px...
All I can see (running on IE7) is the fault line and the top of the smileyIt looks fine to me.
Here's a riddle:
Sigs are cut off after 150pixels, somebody had a signature that exceeded this maximum and it was cutoff. Someone insisted that it was, but the owner of the signature said it was perfectly fine. Why?It had an image and he had images in sigs disabled.
I swear it's cut off.
All I see is the image and the top of the smiley.
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
scimonster wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
It looks fine to me.
Here's a riddle:
Sigs are cut off after 150pixels, somebody had a signature that exceeded this maximum and it was cutoff. Someone insisted that it was, but the owner of the signature said it was perfectly fine. Why?It had an image and he had images in sigs disabled.
I swear it's cut off.
All I see is the image and the top of the smiley.
That was my answer to the riddle.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
scimonster wrote:
It had an image and he had images in sigs disabled.I swear it's cut off.
All I see is the image and the top of the smiley.That was my answer to the riddle.
I know, I know xD
Meh, it's my fault that no-one wants an icon.
It's my fault that I F5'ed this a lot.
C'est moi. I did it ;___:
Offline
BUMPIN' BUMPIN' BUMPIN'
Though no-one's really carin'
Keep them icons comin'
Request!!!
Offline
Bump??
Offline
Bump. And don't forget...
Offline