Scratch

777w wrote:

somelia wrote:

777w wrote:

To prove the number of votes for consoles has to equal the number of votes for handhelds. Adding onto my opinion, the DSi's L&R buttons wear out faster that any of the consoles'.

???

My friend's had hers for about 2 years, they haven't gone out yet, my sister's PS2, went out after a week.

HMM...then it must be the usage. I use my L&R buttons on my DSi ALOT, but not as much on the PS3. Not PS2, PS3.

My sister was, strangely enough, using a PS3 controller on a PS2. I wonder how she got that to work...

777w wrote:

somelia wrote:

GravityCatisalie wrote:

Well then why are you trying to say handhelds are better?

I think consoles, because of course, better graphics, better games, better multiplayer, better EVERYTHING.

I'm trying to prove that neither consoles or handhelds are better than each other; it's a matter of opinion.

To prove the number of votes for consoles has to equal the number of votes for handhelds. Adding onto my opinion, the DSi's L&R buttons wear out faster that any of the consoles'.

I like the DSi, but I have to agree with that.

And if they don't work, it's harder to play half of the games they have. 

somelia wrote:

777w wrote:

somelia wrote:

???

My friend's had hers for about 2 years, they haven't gone out yet, my sister's PS2, went out after a week.

HMM...then it must be the usage. I use my L&R buttons on my DSi ALOT, but not as much on the PS3. Not PS2, PS3.

My sister was, strangely enough, using a PS3 controller on a PS2. I wonder how she got that to work...

It was probably the fact that she WAS doing that. I mean you have to hack into the controller and do all sorts of evil things...

GravityCatisalie wrote:

somelia wrote:

777w wrote:

Handhelds are portable, but consoles usually have better games.

Depends on which game you play though. Pokemon HeartGold vs...let's say...Where's Waldo?

Where's Waldo isn't even a console game.
How about, Halo Reach against, say, Pictochat?

Ha.
______________________________________________________________________

777w wrote:

somelia wrote:

GravityCatisalie wrote:

Well then why are you trying to say handhelds are better?

I think consoles, because of course, better graphics, better games, better multiplayer, better EVERYTHING.

I'm trying to prove that neither consoles or handhelds are better than each other; it's a matter of opinion.

To prove the number of votes for consoles has to equal the number of votes for handhelds. Adding onto my opinion, the DSi's L&R buttons wear out faster that any of the consoles'.

True dat.

Last edited by SpriteMaster (2011-05-31 16:11:21)

Handhelds. While it is fun to sit and waste several unproductive hours leveling up on MW2 or Reach on the PS3/360, you can't take that experience and put it on a handheld. Well, you can try, but it won't be as fun as if it was on the console. Try CoD: World at War for DS and PS3. It's more fun, more immersive on the PS3 than the DS, not just because of Zombies, but because of the way it's presented and how well it plays on PS3 compared to the DS version. Certain games are better for the handheld, others are for Console.

PC gaming also beats Console gaming anytime. Pretty much everything is released for it, and you get oddly fun games such as Minecraft on it. You just need a powerful enough PC for that to happen.

tl;dr, Handhelds + PC gaming.

777w wrote:

somelia wrote:

777w wrote:

Handhelds are portable, but consoles usually have better games.

Depends on which game you play though. Pokemon HeartGold vs...let's say...Where's Waldo?

In that case, I think PS3/XBOX360, cuz PS3 has 3D Dot Game Heroes, a great parody, and it has LBP2, and the 360 has Halo Reach. You can't question the awesomeness of Halo Reach.

XD Just look at my sig!!!

3ds