I use to capitalize all my words, but I've gotten out of the habit.
Anyway: Though I don't have a Mac I would like that ability on my Windows computers.
Offline
I'm sorry, but the quick look option is in MAC OSX Snow Leopard as well. Also I don't understand what this has to do with Scratch.
Offline
jji7skyline wrote:
I'm sorry, but the quick look option is in MAC OSX Snow Leopard as well. Also I don't understand what this has to do with Scratch.
They want quicklook for projects, which likely means working together with the Scratch Team and Apple, which didn't go so well in the past. ^^
Offline
scimonster wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I'm sorry, but the quick look option is in MAC OSX Snow Leopard as well. Also I don't understand what this has to do with Scratch.
They want quicklook for projects, which likely means working together with the Scratch Team and Apple, which didn't go so well in the past. ^^
Yeah. So jji7skyline,Do You Get What I Mean?
Offline
scimonster wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I'm sorry, but the quick look option is in MAC OSX Snow Leopard as well. Also I don't understand what this has to do with Scratch.
They want quicklook for projects, which likely means the Scratch Team working with Apple, which didn't go so well in the past. ^^
Sorry, I can't resist correcting others' grammar.
So anyways, are you referring to the Scratch App incident? Or was there something else?
Which makes me have to think... If it was against the Apple's App Developer terms of service, then wouldn't it be against the normal Apple Developer terms of service to run code other than Apple's?
Therefore, rendering the suggestion invalid.
If this is confirmed, I mean.
Lol. I'm just rambling on to myself.
Offline
1906010 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
jji7skyline wrote:
I'm sorry, but the quick look option is in MAC OSX Snow Leopard as well. Also I don't understand what this has to do with Scratch.
They want quicklook for projects, which likely means the Scratch Team working with Apple, which didn't go so well in the past. ^^
Sorry, I can't resist correcting others' grammar.
So anyways, are you referring to the Scratch App incident? Or was there something else?
Which makes me have to think... If it was against the Apple's App Developer terms of service, then wouldn't it be against the normal Apple Developer terms of service to run code other than Apple's?
Therefore, rendering the suggestion invalid.
If this is confirmed, I mean.
Lol. I'm just rambling on to myself.
*facepalm* Look at the timestamp though.
Yes, I'm referring to the Scratch App.
Offline
I don't think the Scratch Team would have to work together with Apple to make this work - unlike iOS, developing for Mac OS is really quite open, just as it is on any other machine.
As to the suggestion, I do think it's great, although it should probably apply to Snow Leopard as well. My only concern is that there aren't that many Mac-Scratchers out there, so it probably wouldn't get the recognition it deserves, and might just be too much work with little payoff.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
I don't think the Scratch Team would have to work together with Apple to make this work - unlike iOS, developing for Mac OS is really quite open, just as it is on any other machine.
As to the suggestion, I do think it's great, although it should probably apply to Snow Leopard as well. My only concern is that there aren't that many Mac-Scratchers out there, so it probably wouldn't get the recognition it deserves, and might just be too much work with little payoff.
Actually, try conducting a survey. I'll go do that now. :3
EDIT: Clicky!
Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-23 09:11:14)
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
I don't think the Scratch Team would have to work together with Apple to make this work - unlike iOS, developing for Mac OS is really quite open, just as it is on any other machine.
As to the suggestion, I do think it's great, although it should probably apply to Snow Leopard as well. My only concern is that there aren't that many Mac-Scratchers out there, so it probably wouldn't get the recognition it deserves, and might just be too much work with little payoff.
MIT COULD Contact Apple;See If They Can Work Together!
Offline