nuckelavee wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
Harakou wrote:
Not really. The type of block you're looking for would require some new coding to match the block "extension" properties of those in BYOB - possible, but somewhat more difficult than just making a new blockspec. Still, I think this would be worth the time.me too
It's for Scratch 2.0, not for BYOB.
I know.
Offline
nuckelavee wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
Harakou wrote:
Not really. The type of block you're looking for would require some new coding to match the block "extension" properties of those in BYOB - possible, but somewhat more difficult than just making a new blockspec. Still, I think this would be worth the time.me too
It's for Scratch 2.0, not for BYOB.
We know. I was just pointing out that BYOB has a similar interface on some blocks to allow a variable number of arguments.
Offline
Harakou wrote:
nuckelavee wrote:
Pecola1 wrote:
me tooIt's for Scratch 2.0, not for BYOB.
We know. I was just pointing out that BYOB has a similar interface on some blocks to allow a variable number of arguments.
That's kind of off topic.
Offline
Rexpup wrote:
Harakou wrote:
nuckelavee wrote:
It's for Scratch 2.0, not for BYOB.We know. I was just pointing out that BYOB has a similar interface on some blocks to allow a variable number of arguments.
That's kind of off topic.
I don't think so; I was discussing a difficulty that might be encountered while implementing this and giving an example of where it has been done before. What's off topic about that?
Offline
Harakou wrote:
Rexpup wrote:
Harakou wrote:
We know. I was just pointing out that BYOB has a similar interface on some blocks to allow a variable number of arguments.That's kind of off topic.
I don't think so; I was discussing a difficulty that might be encountered while implementing this and giving an example of where it has been done before. What's off topic about that?
Well, this is a suggestion for Scratch 2.0, not just a byob block. I want this to be usable everywhere.
Offline
Rexpup wrote:
Harakou wrote:
Rexpup wrote:
That's kind of off topic.I don't think so; I was discussing a difficulty that might be encountered while implementing this and giving an example of where it has been done before. What's off topic about that?
Well, this is a suggestion for Scratch 2.0, not just a byob block. I want this to be usable everywhere.
I'm aware of that, otherwise this topic wouldn't be in this forum. I'm only mentioning a similar style of block argument extension already implemented in BYOB, and that such a thing is quite doable. This block has a feature that allows you to choose as many "if" spaces for new blocks, does it not?
Offline
Instead lets have a SWITCH block.
___SWITCH (string)
|-CASE (string) (Button to add another case)
|-- CODE TO BE EXECUTED
|-DEFAULT
|-- CODE TO BE EXECUTED
_END OF BLOCK
ALright that's GOTTA be the crudest drawing of a scratch block, but I hope you get what I mean.
Offline