Harakou wrote:
What do you want to truncate?
a number from the end of a variable
Offline
There's probably a much simpler way, but:
Edit: Easier method (but use the first if you're using letters):
Last edited by Kileymeister (2011-05-14 18:14:42)
Offline
Use the (letters (1) through ((length of (text) - (1))) block.
Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-16 04:05:00)
Offline
scimonster wrote:
Use the (letters (1) through ((length of (text) - (1))) block.
![]()
![]()
That requires a modification though. Kileymeister's solution will work in this case, although there may be an easier way.
Offline
Harakou wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Use the (letters (1) through ((length of (text) - (1))) block.
![]()
![]()
That requires a modification though. Kileymeister's solution will work in this case, although there may be an easier way.
The easier way is actually in the link scimonster suggested!
Offline
LS97 wrote:
Harakou wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Use the (letters (1) through ((length of (text) - (1))) block.
![]()
![]()
That requires a modification though. Kileymeister's solution will work in this case, although there may be an easier way.
The easier way is actually in the link scimonster suggested!
![]()
Which is why I gave the link.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
Harakou wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Use the (letters (1) through ((length of (text) - (1))) block.
![]()
![]()
That requires a modification though. Kileymeister's solution will work in this case, although there may be an easier way.
The easier way is actually in the link scimonster suggested!
![]()
Ah, but then it doesn't work if you want to upload it, making it a real pain.
Offline
Harakou wrote:
LS97 wrote:
Harakou wrote:
That requires a modification though. Kileymeister's solution will work in this case, although there may be an easier way.
The easier way is actually in the link scimonster suggested!
![]()
Ah, but then it doesn't work if you want to upload it, making it a real pain.
I linked to a workaround. It can be used.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
Harakou wrote:
LS97 wrote:
The easier way is actually in the link scimonster suggested!![]()
Ah, but then it doesn't work if you want to upload it, making it a real pain.
I linked to a workaround.
It can be used.
![]()
The replica using Scratch blocks? That takes more than one frame though.
Offline
Kileymeister wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Harakou wrote:
Ah, but then it doesn't work if you want to upload it, making it a real pain.
I linked to a workaround.
It can be used.
![]()
The replica using Scratch blocks? That takes more than one frame though.
Live with it. ^^
Offline
scimonster wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
scimonster wrote:
I linked to a workaround.It can be used.
![]()
The replica using Scratch blocks? That takes more than one frame though.
Live with it. ^^
It's just that with my version it only takes a single frame... (look above)
Offline
Kileymeister wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
The replica using Scratch blocks? That takes more than one frame though.Live with it. ^^
It's just that with my version it only takes a single frame... (look above)
7 vs 5. Mine is shorter, and works for anything.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
scimonster wrote:
Live with it. ^^It's just that with my version it only takes a single frame... (look above)
7 vs 5. Mine is shorter, and works for anything.
![]()
He he... thought so. It looked shorter!
Offline
All I'm saying is for the given situation, the shortest, fastest, and easiest method without a Scratch modification is this:
Let's stop arguing about this.
EDIT: I believe the argument is coming from you thinking that I'm talking about my first method. I was talking about my second one, the one in this post.
Last edited by Kileymeister (2011-05-19 15:02:35)
Offline
Kileymeister wrote:
All I'm saying is for the given situation, the shortest, fastest, and easiest method without a Scratch modification is this:
http://i51.tinypic.com/2cbqsk.gif
Let's stop arguing about this.
EDIT: I believe the argument is coming from you thinking that I'm talking about my first method. I was talking about my second one, the one in this post.
But as you said, this one only does numbers.
And your edit is correct.
Offline