Scratch

rdococ · 2011-05-11 18:15:45

hdarken wrote:
rdococ wrote:
Here's a tip: Try looking very close at the image, right near the screen. It gets 3d too.
Good tip.

Is it real cross-eye that or is that just another way to get it 3d?

The following idiot cakes need to die before the message can be deleted:
Cake
Cake
Lies
Lol
Whut?
60secondrule

hmnwilson · 2011-05-11 18:39:31

Since nobody's said it yet, these are known as stereograms - you can find a lot of them by searching Google!

hdarken · 2011-05-11 18:41:28

hmnwilson wrote:
Since nobody's said it yet, these are known as stereograms - you can find a lot of them by searching Google!

Yes, or here.

hdarken · 2011-05-11 20:47:46

Bump!

Kileymeister · 2011-05-11 20:48:57

Too bad it's physically impossible for me to go cross-eyed. Oh well.

somelia · 2011-05-11 20:50:07

COOOOOOL! big_smile

bananaman114 · 2011-05-11 20:50:28

It doesn't really work for me.
It's nothing wrong with the pictures. It's that my right eye's vision isn't great.

somelia · 2011-05-11 20:54:05

bananaman114 wrote:
It doesn't really work for me.
It's nothing wrong with the pictures. It's that my right eye's vision isn't great.

Neither is mine. I need to wear my glasses for it to work. AND I HATE MY GLASSES. They're just - uncomfortable.

veggieman001 · 2011-05-11 22:01:53

Kileymeister wrote:
Too bad it's physically impossible for me to go cross-eyed. Oh well.

me too! why for you?

hdarken · 2011-05-11 23:14:23

somelia wrote:
COOOOOOL!

Thanks! smile

Necromaster · 2011-05-11 23:24:57

hdarken wrote:
Necromaster wrote:
Umm... What is it supposed to do?
Be 3d.

But it isn't 3d...

hdarken · 2011-05-11 23:47:22

Necromaster wrote:
hdarken wrote:
Necromaster wrote:
Umm... What is it supposed to do?
Be 3d.
But it isn't 3d...

Try looking at it cross-eyed, then compare it to not being cross-eyed.

scimonster · 2011-05-12 00:34:38

rdococ wrote:
Here's a tip: Try looking very close at the image, right near the screen. It gets 3d too.

I can't get it any other way. tongue

Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-12 00:34:47)

Goldfish01 · 2011-05-12 04:51:42

Use binoculars turned around so the don't zoom and ajust the distance between them. That is how I got it to work.

rdococ · 2011-05-12 05:54:53

Kileymeister wrote:
Too bad it's physically impossible for me to go cross-eyed. Oh well.

I have an alternative:
1. Look so close at the picture you're basically touching the screen.
2. Wait a few seconds.
3. Done!
Simple as 1-2-done!

veggieman001 · 2011-05-12 09:34:59

rdococ wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
Too bad it's physically impossible for me to go cross-eyed. Oh well.
I have an alternative:
1. Look so close at the picture you're basically touching the screen.
2. Wait a few seconds.
3. Done!
Simple as 1-2-done!

didn't work

scimonster · 2011-05-12 09:37:24

veggieman001 wrote:
rdococ wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
Too bad it's physically impossible for me to go cross-eyed. Oh well.
I have an alternative:
1. Look so close at the picture you're basically touching the screen.
2. Wait a few seconds.
3. Done!
Simple as 1-2-done!
didn't work

Did work.

veggieman001 · 2011-05-12 09:38:01

scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
rdococ wrote:

I have an alternative:
1. Look so close at the picture you're basically touching the screen.
2. Wait a few seconds.
3. Done!
Simple as 1-2-done!
didn't work
Did work.

it's probably that i have one eye

scimonster · 2011-05-12 09:39:58

veggieman001 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
didn't work
Did work.
it's probably that i have one eye

Do you really? neutral

kimmy123 · 2011-05-12 09:40:47

scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
scimonster wrote:

Did work.
it's probably that i have one eye
Do you really?

Some people do have only 1 eye neutral

veggieman001 · 2011-05-12 09:41:49

scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:
scimonster wrote:

Did work.
it's probably that i have one eye
Do you really?

yes i do
is a true fact

rdococ · 2011-05-12 14:47:48

veggieman001 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
veggieman001 wrote:

it's probably that i have one eye
Do you really?
yes i do
is a true fact

Give me a picture of your face.

Kileymeister · 2011-05-12 14:51:48

veggieman001 wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
Too bad it's physically impossible for me to go cross-eyed. Oh well.
me too! why for you?

Surgery as a baby.

@rdococ: It doesn't seem to work very well. It's still two images but they're mashed together a bit more. Not very 3D though.

Last edited by Kileymeister (2011-05-12 15:23:46)

The_Dancing_Donut · 2011-05-12 15:02:40

That's amazing! It's so 3D! My mom and I both found it works really great if you hold your eyes crossed for a while until it goes less blurry. big_smile

hdarken · 2011-05-12 18:23:36

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
That's amazing! It's so 3D! My mom and I both found it works really great if you hold your eyes crossed for a while until it goes less blurry.

Thanks!

Scratch

archived forums

#26 2011-05-11 18:15:45

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

hdarken wrote:

rdococ wrote:

#27 2011-05-11 18:39:31

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

#28 2011-05-11 18:41:28

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

hmnwilson wrote:

#29 2011-05-11 20:47:46

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

#30 2011-05-11 20:48:57

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

#31 2011-05-11 20:50:07

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

#32 2011-05-11 20:50:28

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

#33 2011-05-11 20:54:05

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

bananaman114 wrote:

#34 2011-05-11 22:01:53

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

Kileymeister wrote:

#35 2011-05-11 23:14:23

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

somelia wrote:

#36 2011-05-11 23:24:57

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

hdarken wrote:

Necromaster wrote:

#37 2011-05-11 23:47:22

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

Necromaster wrote:

hdarken wrote:

Necromaster wrote:

#38 2011-05-12 00:34:38

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

rdococ wrote:

#39 2011-05-12 04:51:42

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

#40 2011-05-12 05:54:53

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

Kileymeister wrote:

#41 2011-05-12 09:34:59

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

rdococ wrote:

Kileymeister wrote:

#42 2011-05-12 09:37:24

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

veggieman001 wrote:

rdococ wrote:

Kileymeister wrote:

#43 2011-05-12 09:38:01

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

scimonster wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

rdococ wrote:

#44 2011-05-12 09:39:58

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

veggieman001 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

#45 2011-05-12 09:40:47

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

scimonster wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#46 2011-05-12 09:41:49

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

scimonster wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

#47 2011-05-12 14:47:48

Re: 3d! (No glasses)

veggieman001 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

veggieman001 wrote:

#48 2011-05-12 14:51:48