Scratch

Pecola1 wrote:

To save space would this be better:

YourLocalBlockLib wrote:

Scratch Blocks post with values added by section links.

The only thing changed is the number of blocks in that category is there, then we can remove it from the other place.

But then what's the point of a stats page?

Last edited by scimonster (2011-05-04 21:36:28)

Pecola1 wrote:

OMG! I accidentally posted a bad word (fifth word in above post) I edited it before anyone saw it though. *phew* I just missed a letter.

lol

Just tried to add a download, but I don't think it work...
~SSBBM
[edited by Pecola1 because of the sig  ]

Last edited by YourLocalBlockLib (2011-05-06 10:16:32)

.                             

Panther blocks added: [2]
[57] by Johnnydean1
[58] by Johnnydean1

Update carried out by block librarian: Sparks
________________________________________________________________________________
^home
^updates archive

I started work on the Library because at the time, the block making craze had appeared (just after the mod making craze started) and places were starting to spring up all over the fora asking for block code, giving block code or having block code competitions and I felt that if these blocks could all be collected and ordered into one place with a nice layout and structure this would benefit everyone! If you remember the first draft of this library, where all blocks from all categories were in one post without images or anything you will realise how far it has come, and though I've been the one making the changes it's many of the communities ideas that have shaped the library to how it looks now.

As I would have thought obvious, this library contained nothing when it first started 
If you look at the first few replies in the old block library someone will probably have quoted the entire library or part of it at least so that might let you see how it looked originally.

sparks wrote:

I started work on the Library because at the time, the block making craze had appeared (just after the mod making craze started) and places were starting to spring up all over the fora asking for block code, giving block code or having block code competitions and I felt that if these blocks could all be collected and ordered into one place with a nice layout and structure this would benefit everyone! If you remember the first draft of this library, where all blocks from all categories were in one post without images or anything you will realise how far it has come, and though I've been the one making the changes it's many of the communities ideas that have shaped the library to how it looks now.

As I would have thought obvious, this library contained nothing when it first started 
If you look at the first few replies in the old block library someone will probably have quoted the entire library or part of it at least so that might let you see how it looked originally.

What was the date? I wan't to know.  Was in the craze I believe, but wasn't a forumer. I am not sure, so I want to know when it was.

The block library started: 15/07/2010. I remember I spammed about 30 Panther blocks in it.

Pecola1 wrote:

johnnydean1 wrote:

The block library started: 15/07/2010. I remember I spammed about 30 Panther blocks in it.

Thanks. Lets see... 8 Months, 3 weeks... October, 17, 2010 or 10/17/2010. Wait, you said it was 15/07/2010, theres only 12 months in a year! How did you get that number?

I use English formats, 15th day of the 7th month.

I'm trying out this block importer thingamabobber. So, I got the block file browser up, but exactly how do I actually get the block? Do I copy the spec and the code into a text file, or are there separate files, or what?

Thanks!

Hey! Blocks 57 & 58 for panther are pretty cool, but could you do the same for lists?

Pecola1 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Operators: 49!?
I knew it!
We have way too many Operators blocks. 

I would say we should look at some, also, in scratch there are some not needed, the < < > = < > > and the (- ( ) ) blocks, are redundant, the = you can use the < [ ] = [ ] > block and the negative you can use the ( ( ) - ( ) ) block (just put the number you want negative of in the second insert.)

Should we take these off sparks?

Last edited by Pecola1 (2011-05-07 13:23:57)

Pecola1 wrote:

Pecola1 wrote:

scimonster wrote:

Operators: 49!?
I knew it!
We have way too many Operators blocks. :P

I would say we should look at some, also, in scratch there are some not needed, the < < > = < > > and the (- ( ) ) blocks, are redundant, the = you can use the < [ ] = [ ] > block and the negative you can use the ( ( ) - ( ) ) block (just put the number you want negative of in the second insert.)

Should we take these off sparks?
__________________________________________________________________________________
http://aphrodite.cooltext.com/rendered/ … 353170.gif
^(like the logo)^

The logo does not show an image... Cooltext does not host their images for long after your generation is complete so you need to host it somewhere else!

I think that maybe we should remove them, if the section is getting really clogged. Otherwise maybe we could add a "useful scripts" section to the library where things like (-( )) can be demonstrated as a script ( ( ) * )-1) ).

Last edited by sparks (2011-05-07 02:36:04)

sparks wrote:

I think that maybe we should remove them, if the section is getting really clogged. Otherwise maybe we could add a "useful scripts" section to the library where things like (-( ) ) can be demonstrated as a script ( ( ) * )-1) ).

I think that would be good, and BTW, the best way is just one block:

                      ((    <-> number goes here ))