ssss wrote:
scimonster wrote:
ssss wrote:
your beggining to sound so like me its not funny :0i have reached my goal!
not yet, u must have a tut to b so lik me it is not funy - The ruls
1. neva spel propaly
2. uuse lots of #;ssss
3. Creeate lists
4. Neva chaeng ya usr icon
5. Liv like Tony Stark
1) OK
2) how
3) wut am i doin now
4) i dont
5) hu is tony stark?
Offline
scimonster wrote:
ssss wrote:
scimonster wrote:
i have reached my goal!not yet, u must have a tut to b so lik me it is not funy - The ruls
1. neva spel propaly
2. uuse lots of #;ssss
3. Creeate lists
4. Neva chaeng ya usr icon
5. Liv like Tony Stark1) OK
2) how
3) wut am i doin now
4) i dont
5) hu is tony stark?
1) ...
2) say 1. i like lists 2. this is a number list
3. a listt
4.
5. irron mann alternnative personallity
Offline
ssss wrote:
scimonster wrote:
ssss wrote:
not yet, u must have a tut to b so lik me it is not funy - The ruls
1. neva spel propaly
2. uuse lots of #;ssss
3. Creeate lists
4. Neva chaeng ya usr icon
5. Liv like Tony Stark1) OK
2) how
3) wut am i doin now
4) i dont
5) hu is tony stark?1) ...
2) say 1. i like lists 2. this is a number list
3. a listt
4.![]()
5. irron mann alternnative personallity
1) I LIKEZ PICKLES!!!
2) 1- oh 2- i am 3- next
3) exactley
4)
6) ohhh. who is dat?
Offline
ssss wrote:
let's stop spamming my topic
![]()
I don't want it closed![]()
Of course.
I was about to say that when I finished my cracker. (now)
Time 4 me 2 b sci again.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
ssss wrote:
let's stop spamming my topic
![]()
I don't want it closed![]()
Of course.
![]()
I was about to say that when I finished my cracker. (now)
Time 4 me 2 b sci again.
PLEASE keep the sig
lol - to late
at least add the 60 second rule in -_-
Last edited by ssss (2011-04-26 07:20:51)
Offline
ssss wrote:
scimonster wrote:
ssss wrote:
let's stop spamming my topic
![]()
I don't want it closed![]()
Of course.
![]()
I was about to say that when I finished my cracker. (now)
Time 4 me 2 b sci again.PLEASE keep the sig
![]()
lol - to late![]()
at least add the 60 second rule in -_-
Some librarian will call me a hypocrite if I do.
=_=
EDIT: It's that
at the bottom.
Last edited by scimonster (2011-04-26 07:25:32)
Offline
Not me. =_=
Offline
I need a good sig. My goal is to reach 1337 by the end of next month, and 3000 by the end of the year. Ya

Offline
Hmm... I don't know what my next milestone is
Offline
ssss wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Hmm... I don't know what my next milestone is
![]()
3043?
OMG I REACHED IT!!!111
Heh, I don't normally spam, though there was an incident involving you, werdna and me... remember?
With the exploding heads!
Offline
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
ssss wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Hmm... I don't know what my next milestone is
![]()
3043?
OMG I REACHED IT!!!111
Heh, I don't normally spam, though there was an incident involving you, werdna and me... remember?With the exploding heads!
i do believe that i'm elmo...
In walmart...
watching u walk down the vegge aisle
Offline
ssss wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
ssss wrote:
3043?OMG I REACHED IT!!!111
Heh, I don't normally spam, though there was an incident involving you, werdna and me... remember?With the exploding heads!
i do believe that i'm elmo...
In walmart...
watching u walk down the vegge aisle
Oh, God. I remember alright, you hologram.
Offline
Alternatives wrote:
12three wrote:
Alternatives wrote:
I understand that, I just don't see how people would get worked up over that. Just post once more 667.You don't have to understand it just respect it.
There's a dude who quit because of it. Its like telling people to worship you when your posts amount to 777.
Exactly. Why celebrate it?
Offline
werdna123 wrote:
ssss wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
OMG I REACHED IT!!!111
Heh, I don't normally spam, though there was an incident involving you, werdna and me... remember?With the exploding heads!
i do believe that i'm elmo...
In walmart...
watching u walk down the vegge aisleOh, God. I remember alright, you hologram.
I got so worried about that fiasco!
Offline
rufflebee wrote:
Looks like our regular spammers have reverted back to their ways..
Offline
rufflebee wrote:
Looks like our regular spammers have reverted back to their ways..
I completely agree.
Offline
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
rufflebee wrote:
Looks like our regular spammers have reverted back to their ways..
![]()
It's not a good thing.
Looking through this thread, I've noticed it seems very spammy and chatty so I've gone ahead and reported it for the benefit of the community.

Offline
I do not spam. Spam is gross

Offline
urhungry wrote:
I just passed 3000 and I'm half way to 3500. I hope to hit 5000 by next year.
You only have 2702 posts.
Last edited by scratcher7_13 (2011-05-08 21:18:46)
Offline