Scratch
archived forums
#27 2011-04-25 12:20:11
- Necromaster
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-04-07
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Recolors are NOT original
LinkGuy wrote:
12three wrote:
I like the tirade. It's true but I think you overkilled it...
I honestly don't think I overdid it
I spoke my mind, if little kids on this site rant about kaj and all that, then I have my right to rant about what I think.
Who said they have a right to rant about Kaj?
Offline
#30 2011-04-25 14:50:07
- SpriteMaster
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-01-25
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Recolors are NOT original
Kileymeister wrote:
Quite true. Though that doesn't seem to be the biggest problem right now, it is definitely a large factor.
I've done recolors. I call them recolors. Simple. i do hate those imposters though.
Offline
#32 2011-04-25 14:53:43
- bananaman114
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-03-15
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Recolors are NOT original
kimmy123 wrote:
We can still recolor if we want
@TV So, all of a sudden your grammar is impeccable?
Anyway, how did you ppost this if it was closed?
the sun still shines
Offline
#33 2011-04-25 14:55:52
Re: Recolors are NOT original
bananaman114 wrote:
kimmy123 wrote:
We can still recolor if we want
@TV So, all of a sudden your grammar is impeccable?
Anyway, how did you ppost this if it was closed?
yes, it is. i always use proper grammar.
-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. !
.Offline
#34 2011-04-25 15:00:48
- SpriteMaster
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-01-25
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Recolors are NOT original
TVflea wrote:
bananaman114 wrote:
kimmy123 wrote:
We can still recolor if we want
@TV So, all of a sudden your grammar is impeccable?
Anyway, how did you ppost this if it was closed?yes, it is. i always use proper grammar.
That was a funny joke.
Offline
#35 2011-04-25 15:50:51
Re: Recolors are NOT original
bananaman114 wrote:
kimmy123 wrote:
We can still recolor if we want
@TV So, all of a sudden your grammar is impeccable?
Anyway, how did you ppost this if it was closed?
If that was at tvflea why did you quote me?
Offline
#36 2011-04-25 16:05:03
Re: Recolors are NOT original
SpriteMaster wrote:
TVflea wrote:
bananaman114 wrote:
@TV So, all of a sudden your grammar is impeccable?
Anyway, how did you ppost this if it was closed?yes, it is. i always use proper grammar.
That was a funny joke.
-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. !
.Offline
#40 2011-04-25 16:40:47
Re: Recolors are NOT original
jfmlove6 wrote:
Your right, but it woulden't exactly be copied because they had changed something.
Look at it like this: you only get sued if its an exact copy.
Unless they have permission then it's ok, but I just don't like the fact that people are stealing other peoples art, animations, and even games and claiming it as their own.
When cakes are abundant, and llamas are the new camels, is when I will beleave that children are part of the federal oompaloompa society
Offline
#41 2011-04-25 16:46:03
Re: Recolors are NOT original
kimmy123 wrote:
LinkGuy wrote:
jamopop wrote:
i think ur going a bit OTT
OTT?
Over the top
Oh lol thanks
When cakes are abundant, and llamas are the new camels, is when I will beleave that children are part of the federal oompaloompa society
Offline
#42 2011-04-25 16:48:47
Re: Recolors are NOT original
Necromaster wrote:
LinkGuy wrote:
12three wrote:
I like the tirade. It's true but I think you overkilled it...
I honestly don't think I overdid it :P I spoke my mind, if little kids on this site rant about kaj and all that, then I have my right to rant about what I think.
Who said they have a right to rant about Kaj? :P
No offense but every time news gets around that "kaj" (even though I don't really care if they hack me XD) everyone gets so hyped up about it, and those projects are making it to the front page :P
When cakes are abundant, and llamas are the new camels, is when I will beleave that children are part of the federal oompaloompa society
Offline
#43 2011-04-25 16:49:59
Re: Recolors are NOT original
jamopop wrote:
i think ur going a bit OTT
Lol I don't think I did but it's what I stood up for :P
When cakes are abundant, and llamas are the new camels, is when I will beleave that children are part of the federal oompaloompa society
Offline
#44 2011-04-25 17:27:22
- spongebob123
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-05-10
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Recolors are NOT original
Earthboundjeff wrote:
Recolors are an art form, and like it or not, they ARE in fact socially acceptable and some people DO do them and have fun making them and they are as much an artist as anybody else.
Well, if they're MEANT to be recolored, then it's somewhat acceptable, but not if they're stolen without permission.
Offline
#45 2011-04-25 17:38:30
- AnimeCreatorArtist
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-25
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Recolors are NOT original
this reminds me of A Sonic Short.
Now you have your own stolen-edit-stupid-edit-ORIGINAL FANART!
I'm basically honorary nasty. N-n-n-n-nasty jazz
Offline
#46 2011-04-26 13:37:30
Re: Recolors are NOT original
spongebob123 wrote:
Earthboundjeff wrote:
Recolors are an art form, and like it or not, they ARE in fact socially acceptable and some people DO do them and have fun making them and they are as much an artist as anybody else.
Well, if they're MEANT to be recolored, then it's somewhat acceptable, but not if they're stolen without permission.
Agreed
When cakes are abundant, and llamas are the new camels, is when I will beleave that children are part of the federal oompaloompa society
Offline