Scratch

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-04-21 11:07:53

Rufflebee used to talk different!

http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 75#p544575

kimmy123 · 2011-04-21 11:08:59

I like the days she did big_smile

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-04-21 11:09:46

kimmy123 wrote:
I like the days she did

I wasn't around. tongue

Alternatives · 2011-04-21 11:11:27

Of course, it was recently that she started being the ruffle we know.
She used to be very helpful to new scratchers too.

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-04-21 11:13:44

http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic … 21#p466421

The_Dancing_Donut · 2011-04-21 11:20:26

Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-04-21 11:21:18

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...

Blade still does.

recycle49 · 2011-04-21 11:21:21

kimmy123 wrote:
I like the days she did

I do remember those days...

Alternatives · 2011-04-21 11:21:46

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...

Blade has always talked with grammar lol

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-04-21 11:29:09

http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=82332#p82332
FMT.

Alternatives · 2011-04-21 11:31:24

ProgrammingFreak wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=82332#p82332
FMT.

FMT, Blade and RHY have always used grammar.
Its just ruffle and echs that don't use it anymore

The_Dancing_Donut · 2011-04-21 11:50:20

Alternatives wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...
Blade has always talked with grammar

Well, he used to talk like this.

now he talks like this...

its a bit different

i think?

Alternatives · 2011-04-21 11:54:41

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Alternatives wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...
Blade has always talked with grammar
Well, he used to talk like this.

now he talks like this...

its a bit different

i think?

That's how ruffle talks, not Blade.
Behold! This is Blade's latest post. If you look closely you'll see his grammar is perfect.

Necromaster · 2011-04-21 11:55:52

ProgrammingFreak wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...
Blade still does.

Without .'s

Alternatives · 2011-04-21 11:56:34

Necromaster wrote:
ProgrammingFreak wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Yeah, I remember when Blade and Ruffle used to talk with grammar...
Blade still does.
Without .'s

So? I didn't either.

Last edited by Alternatives (2011-04-21 11:56:56)

The_Dancing_Donut · 2011-04-21 12:00:15

Alternatives wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Alternatives wrote:

Blade has always talked with grammar
Well, he used to talk like this.

now he talks like this...

its a bit different

i think?
That's how ruffle talks, not Blade.
Behold! This is Blade's latest post. If you look closely you'll see his grammar is perfect.

*Ahem*

So you don't use full-stops, eh? tongue

And not using any punctuation at the end of a post is not strictly correct gramar - as in, if you did that in an exam you would fail.

Alternatives · 2011-04-21 12:01:41

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Alternatives wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

Well, he used to talk like this.

now he talks like this...

its a bit different

i think?
That's how ruffle talks, not Blade.
Behold! This is Blade's latest post. If you look closely you'll see his grammar is perfect.
*Ahem*

So you don't use full-stops, eh?

And not using any punctuation at the end of a post is not strictly correct gramar - as in, if you did that in an exam you would fail.

Anyway, not using fullstops doesn't mean he talks like this:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
now he talks like this...

its a bit different

i think?

The_Dancing_Donut · 2011-04-21 12:04:29

Alternatives wrote:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
Alternatives wrote:

That's how ruffle talks, not Blade.
Behold! This is Blade's latest post. If you look closely you'll see his grammar is perfect.
*Ahem*

So you don't use full-stops, eh?

And not using any punctuation at the end of a post is not strictly correct gramar - as in, if you did that in an exam you would fail.
Anyway, not using fullstops doesn't mean he talks like this:
The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
now he talks like this...

its a bit different

i think?

Okay, he sometimes talks a bit like this
But he uses question marks? I think he does

urhungry · 2011-04-21 12:08:49

All of this lack of grammar is scaring me. Anyway, I talked to Rufflebee when she had 80 posts and used punctuation.

werdna123 · 2011-04-21 13:21:48

ruffle used to talk with perfect grammar. Then turntech taught her the way of cool. But seriously, talking about someone behind there backs? That's mean, bro. :C

The_Dancing_Donut · 2011-04-21 13:38:54

werdna123 wrote:
ruffle used to talk with perfect grammar. Then turntech taught her the way of cool. But seriously, talking about someone behind there backs? That's mean, bro. :C

You type different now, too. You talk a bit like ruffle.

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-04-21 13:45:17

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
ruffle used to talk with perfect grammar. Then turntech taught her the way of cool. But seriously, talking about someone behind there backs? That's mean, bro. :C
You type different now, too. You talk a bit like ruffle.

Same with cpumaster. v_v

werdna123 · 2011-04-21 13:51:49

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:
werdna123 wrote:
ruffle used to talk with perfect grammar. Then turntech taught her the way of cool. But seriously, talking about someone behind there backs? That's mean, bro. :C
You type different now, too. You talk a bit like ruffle.

No I don't. Using :C a lot doesn't make me like ruffle. It just makes me use :C a lot. Isn't that obvious?

TheSuccessor · 2011-04-21 15:55:18

Rufflebee used grammar!!!???

Also,

ProgrammingFreak wrote:
Rufflebee used to talk differently!

tongue

Last edited by TheSuccessor (2011-04-21 15:55:29)

hdarken · 2011-04-21 16:04:15

Rufflebee is a kind bee.

The olden days...

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-04-21 11:07:53

:OOO Look at This

#2 2011-04-21 11:08:59

Re: :OOO Look at This

#3 2011-04-21 11:09:46

Re: :OOO Look at This

kimmy123 wrote:

#4 2011-04-21 11:11:27

Re: :OOO Look at This

#5 2011-04-21 11:13:44

Re: :OOO Look at This

#6 2011-04-21 11:20:26

Re: :OOO Look at This

#7 2011-04-21 11:21:18

Re: :OOO Look at This

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#8 2011-04-21 11:21:21

Re: :OOO Look at This

kimmy123 wrote:

#9 2011-04-21 11:21:46

Re: :OOO Look at This

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#10 2011-04-21 11:29:09

Re: :OOO Look at This

#11 2011-04-21 11:31:24

Re: :OOO Look at This

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

#12 2011-04-21 11:50:20

Re: :OOO Look at This

Alternatives wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#13 2011-04-21 11:54:41

Re: :OOO Look at This

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

Alternatives wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#14 2011-04-21 11:55:52

Re: :OOO Look at This

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#15 2011-04-21 11:56:34

Re: :OOO Look at This

Necromaster wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#16 2011-04-21 12:00:15

Re: :OOO Look at This

Alternatives wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

Alternatives wrote:

#17 2011-04-21 12:01:41

Re: :OOO Look at This

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

Alternatives wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#18 2011-04-21 12:04:29

Re: :OOO Look at This

Alternatives wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

Alternatives wrote:

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

#19 2011-04-21 12:08:49

Re: :OOO Look at This

#20 2011-04-21 13:21:48

Re: :OOO Look at This

#21 2011-04-21 13:38:54

Re: :OOO Look at This

werdna123 wrote:

#22 2011-04-21 13:45:17

Re: :OOO Look at This

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

#23 2011-04-21 13:51:49

Re: :OOO Look at This

The_Dancing_Donut wrote:

werdna123 wrote:

#24 2011-04-21 15:55:18