This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2011-04-15 20:57:16

guyman55
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-23
Posts: 500+

OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

I like the splat oen because it looks more funnier than the new logo

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-b6oV0ZmGJYc/TXlVahV8ByI/AAAAAAAAAm4/N7Q7M27ttcQ/s400/nick_logo.png


I hate this logo because its boring, it needs to die http://www.dishtracking.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Nick-New-Logo.jpg

Offline

 

#2 2011-04-15 21:00:54

scratcher7_13
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-02-09
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

I like the old one. Hey, I have an idea! what if we have a poll on which logo looks best, and if people like the old one best, we can mail the results to Nickelodeon. (Not that this will do much.)


♫ 90% of teens can't do math. If you are one of the 40% of teens who can, copy and paste this into your signature. ♫♪
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6273449/BlockLibraryTitle.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/mr9Hf.gif

Offline

 

#3 2011-04-15 21:04:41

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

i like the new one


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

#4 2011-04-15 21:06:14

thebuilderdd
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

New New New

Offline

 

#5 2011-04-15 21:12:30

Aidan
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-06-15
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

Offline

 

#6 2011-04-15 21:15:10

kimmy123
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-05-20
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

I like the old one  big_smile


http://i.imgur.com/Mg3TPIE.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/rgyzXV5.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/685FKVd.pnghttp://24.media.tumblr.com/8678e33865664f328e1654109679cb92/tumblr_mm1qu3jGD71s8caito3_r1_250.gif

Offline

 

#7 2011-04-15 21:16:19

guyman55
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-23
Posts: 500+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

thebuilderdd wrote:

New New New

Just because everything that's new dosn't make it better than old ones but thats your opinion.

Offline

 

#8 2011-04-15 21:28:17

-iNetMaster-
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-30
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

old

Offline

 

#9 2011-04-15 21:37:07

johndo77
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-07-30
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

guyman55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

New New New

Just because everything that's new dosn't make it better than old ones but thats your opinion.

Or maybe he just likes the new one.

Just because it's old doesn't mean it's better than the new one.


Crizapples

Offline

 

#10 2011-04-16 18:59:46

tootootoo
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-03-11
Posts: 38

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

I like the new one better because it's a darker shade of orange and the font is better. Also I like how the backround is plain white. But that's just my opinion.


http://i.imgur.com/5tnBS.png

Offline

 

#11 2011-04-16 19:50:51

higejolly
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-08
Posts: 500+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

Aidan wrote:

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

+1


http://www.free-iqtest.net/images/badges2/l102.gif
Free-IQTest.net - IQ Test

Offline

 

#12 2011-04-16 19:55:59

thebuilderdd
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

higejolly wrote:

Aidan wrote:

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

+1

+2

Offline

 

#13 2011-04-16 20:03:21

guyman55
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-23
Posts: 500+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

thebuilderdd wrote:

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

like this? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/guyman55/1729350

Offline

 

#14 2011-04-16 20:15:08

thebuilderdd
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-01-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

guyman55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

like this? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/guyman55/1729350

I didn't say that.

Offline

 

#15 2011-04-16 20:17:51

guyman55
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-23
Posts: 500+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

thebuilderdd wrote:

guyman55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

like this? http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/guyman55/1729350

I didn't say that.

What where u saying?

Offline

 

#16 2011-04-16 20:19:33

scratch_yoshi
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

guyman55 wrote:

thebuilderdd wrote:

I didn't say that.

What where u saying?

No, Aidan said that XD


Retired from Scratch, but just the language itself. Not the forums.

Offline

 

#17 2011-04-17 00:48:25

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

why do you care? you only see it for about 2 seconds after the show or on advertisements.


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

#18 2011-04-17 04:20:29

werdna123
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-06-12
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

TVflea wrote:

why do you care? you only see it for about 2 seconds after the show or on advertisements.

I agree. Who cares?

Offline

 

#19 2011-04-17 10:34:36

Nuttlajer
Scratcher
Registered: 2011-01-01
Posts: 100+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

I think the new one looks cleaner somehow. But like TVflea said, it doesn't really make a difference for anything.

Last edited by Nuttlajer (2011-04-17 10:34:43)


http://i55.tinypic.com/9sci2a.png

Offline

 

#20 2011-04-17 11:14:46

hdarken
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-06-26
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

Old, it is better than the upside-down u and the ick.


http://i.imgur.com/VskBk.png
http://i.imgur.com/tgxVZ.jpg

Offline

 

#21 2011-04-17 11:52:26

guyman55
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-05-23
Posts: 500+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

hdarken wrote:

Old, it is better than the upside-down u and the ick.

With the upside down U you mean the copyright sign right?

Offline

 

#22 2011-04-17 21:11:37

Musicstar888
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-31
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

I like the new one, it's more mature to me and the dot on the i looks like a lava lamp blob XD
No offense, but the old one kind of reminds me of like vomit or something. It just looks like puke to me..... hmm  I'm sorry, that's just my opinion.


Goodbye, Misc. Until we meet again.
You're not alone.

Offline

 

#23 2011-04-17 21:25:35

geohendan
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

Aidan wrote:

They should combine them and put the cool new font on the old splatter

Yesh!  big_smile


Scratching that nasty wart on my back since 2009!
http://i.imgur.com/OzpGtWV.jpg

Offline

 

#24 2011-04-17 21:26:58

geohendan
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-08-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

guyman55 wrote:

hdarken wrote:

Old, it is better than the upside-down u and the ick.

With the upside down U you mean the copyright sign right?

lol no they mean the N


Scratching that nasty wart on my back since 2009!
http://i.imgur.com/OzpGtWV.jpg

Offline

 

#25 2011-04-18 20:37:19

TVflea
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-14
Posts: 1000+

Re: OLD NICK LOGO vs boring 2011 logo :(

Musicstar888 wrote:

I like the new one, it's more mature to me and the dot on the i looks like a lava lamp blob XD

thats funny


-iNetMaster-'s not dead, get used to it. ! big_smile .
http://is.gd/YrQzXX

Offline

 

Board footer