user number 139? Why not 140? I was searching for the very first user ever and it was Andresmh, number 139. Why not use 1? It doesn’t make sense!!
Offline
henley wrote:
user number 139? Why not 140? I was searching for the very first user ever and it was Andresmh, number 139. Why not use 1? It doesn’t make sense!!
I think the first 138 were tests.
Offline
He's the 139th andresmh O_O
Offline
But strange enough, wrgsfhwbxvb is user number 1.
Offline
mathematics wrote:
But strange enough, wrgsfhwbxvb is user number 1.
How do you know?
Lol, they typed random letters for the first 138 users.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
henley wrote:
user number 139? Why not 140? I was searching for the very first user ever and it was Andresmh, number 139. Why not use 1? It doesn’t make sense!!
I think the first 138 were tests.
That would be correct. Just like the first numbered projects were tests and aren't around anymore, the same goes for the users, except nobody uses those accounts.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
henley wrote:
user number 139? Why not 140? I was searching for the very first user ever and it was Andresmh, number 139. Why not use 1? It doesn’t make sense!!
I think the first 138 were tests.
that's a lot.
Offline
henley wrote:
mathematics wrote:
But strange enough, wrgsfhwbxvb is user number 1.
How do you know?
Offline
mathematics wrote:
henley wrote:
mathematics wrote:
But strange enough, wrgsfhwbxvb is user number 1.
How do you know?
?
Offline
mathematics wrote:
henley wrote:
mathematics wrote:
But strange enough, wrgsfhwbxvb is user number 1.
How do you know?
I wonder why all of the other tests aren’t there. Unless galleries was the first thing they tested, and the second was friends or some thing.
Offline