TuffGhost wrote:
Alternatives wrote:
Kileymeister wrote:
That's just "famous" animators. There's tons of good ones around the site.
Really? Can you give me a few links? I'm dying for some entertainment
![]()
me
![]()
I know that. But your stuff are moar cycle-ish.
SO JU TINK JU CAN DANCE
Offline
BlahBlahRatSheep wrote:
I do lip-syncing and movement also!
doesn't dialgaman do lip-syncing to though? I also think he does movement also. c:
He tries to lip sync, and he rather close, but no.
Offline
Bump.
Offline
and actually it's not just scratchers
people on dA are just being lazy now, with their "stylized" animation
i think it means "stupid" in polish
Last edited by littletonkslover (2011-04-04 16:32:07)

Offline
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/WazzoTV/1608037
greatest animation i've ever seen
ever

Offline
The way I see it, there are four types of animation available for development:
1. The style in which uses dialogue, humor, and quick background changes to express. The lip-syncing is not synced. Swifty2 and TheExplodingCheez are fine examples of this. Also, basically all the 'random animation' videos.
2. The style in which uses slapstick humor. Think of Looney Tunes, Wile E. Coyote, Sylvester, Tom & Jerry, and all those types of animations. They aren't as involved in dialogue, but they focus on funny sounds and smoothly animated action.
3. The style in which it balances dialogue, lip-syncing, music, and animation all into one. These tend to be serious (may involve pans and transitions) or funny in nature. Generally people either like Style 1. or Style 3. the best.
4. The style that has superb everything. Which is basically film-quality. Hard to come by; though you can pose as one.
I think it's probably better to animate in a different program than scratch for the more high-quality and labor-taxing animation projects. Though it also works for the funny ones (like ASDF and other stickmen animations on Youtube) as well.
Whatever, this is just my opinion. You can basically either go funny low and high quality, or serious low and high quality.

Offline
rufflebee wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/WazzoTV/1608037
greatest animation i've ever seen
ever
EVER

Offline
rufflebee wrote:
rufflebee wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/WazzoTV/1608037
greatest animation i've ever seen
everEVER
Thats mah mom!
Offline
Ludichris1 wrote:
The way I see it, there are four types of animation available for development:
1. The style in which uses dialogue, humor, and quick background changes to express. The lip-syncing is not synced. Swifty2 and TheExplodingCheez are fine examples of this. Also, basically all the 'random animation' videos.
2. The style in which uses slapstick humor. Think of Looney Tunes, Wile E. Coyote, Sylvester, Tom & Jerry, and all those types of animations. They aren't as involved in dialogue, but they focus on funny sounds and smoothly animated action.
3. The style in which it balances dialogue, lip-syncing, music, and animation all into one. These tend to be serious (may involve pans and transitions) or funny in nature. Generally people either like Style 1. or Style 3. the best.
4. The style that has superb everything. Which is basically film-quality. Hard to come by; though you can pose as one.
I think it's probably better to animate in a different program than scratch for the more high-quality and labor-taxing animation projects. Though it also works for the funny ones (like ASDF and other stickmen animations on Youtube) as well.
Whatever, this is just my opinion. You can basically either go funny low and high quality, or serious low and high quality.
True dat
Offline