Kileymeister wrote:
Ludichris1 wrote:
Talking animals are impossible
(no Koko the chimp and parrots don't count, cuz they aren't even saying full sentences.)
Ack! We're mutes! I never knew that!
(no flame war argument about whether humans are actually animals or not, personally to me it only makes sense that we are)
@geohendan: I think they actually hooked a blind guy's brain to a computer with a camera and he could see (with limited vision though)
oh. Oh, well, without technology.

Offline
Ludichris1 wrote:
Talking animals are impossible
(no Koko the chimp and parrots don't count, cuz they aren't even saying full sentences.)
http://www.youtuberepeat.com/watch?v=9L … re=related
Those are sentences.
If you think not, there are some sentences in here: http://www.scratch.mit.edu/ext/youtube/?v=skE2dq3cm0A

Offline
win the race with the running man.
Last edited by Earthboundjeff (2011-03-14 19:17:56)
Offline
agscratcher wrote:
PW132 wrote:
Beat IWBTG on Impossible.
That's possible. I've seen it with my own eyes, man.
Not its not.
Urban legend states that there's a wall or something so you can't procceed to defeat the Guy. Nobody can confirm or deny this because they haven't got to that point yet, and the creator's not saying anything.
So Impossible is literally impossible.
Offline
It's impossible that my hair will ever not be how I wish it would.
bbbeb wrote:
ssss wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
![]()
As i said, when i make it and it's 100% chocolate and -0% fruit
![]()
I make mine with 2-5% fruit, 0% vegetables, 45% vanilla, and rest % chocolate.
I've never had it
Offline
Chatter wrote:
It's impossible that my hair will ever not be how I wish it would.
bbbeb wrote:
ssss wrote:
As i said, when i make it and it's 100% chocolate and -0% fruit![]()
I make mine with 2-5% fruit, 0% vegetables, 45% vanilla, and rest % chocolate.
I've never had it
... Neither have I
Offline
ssss wrote:
Chatter wrote:
It's impossible that my hair will ever not be how I wish it would.
bbbeb wrote:
I make mine with 2-5% fruit, 0% vegetables, 45% vanilla, and rest % chocolate.I've never had it
... Neither have I
![]()
XD
Offline
geohendan wrote:
Blue being purple.
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
geohendan wrote:
Describing a word using no adjectives.
Jumping cat.
Offline
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
geohendan wrote:
Blue being purple.
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
geohendan wrote:
Describing a word using no adjectives.
Jumping cat.
![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
Offline
scimonster wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
geohendan wrote:
Blue being purple.
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
geohendan wrote:
Describing a word using no adjectives.
Jumping cat.
![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
Use a codeword, maybe
Offline
scimonster wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
geohendan wrote:
Blue being purple.
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
geohendan wrote:
Describing a word using no adjectives.
Jumping cat.
![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
No, the cat is jumping.
Offline
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
geohendan wrote:
Blue being purple.
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
Jumping cat.![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
No, the cat is jumping.
It's not a 'jumping'
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
That's what it's doing, not what it is.![]()
No, the cat is jumping.
It's not a 'jumping'
![]()
Yeah it is, it's a jumping cat.
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
No, the cat is jumping.
It's not a 'jumping'
![]()
It’s not a ‘black’ either.
That would be using a verb (or adjective) as a noun. As much as I would love to explain the philosophy of what is a noun, I won’t.
Just know that an action verb is always describing the noun.
Last edited by henley (2011-03-15 15:46:31)
Offline
scimonster wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
geohendan wrote:
Blue being purple.
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
geohendan wrote:
Describing a word using no adjectives.
Jumping cat.
![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
You are wrong,
Look, a Jumping Cat!
Look=Verb A=Preposition Jumping=Verb Cat=Noun
"A" tells you that there is only one cat.
Using a fragment like "Jumping Cat is not Grammatically Correct.
OWNED
Offline
Enzo1997 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
Jumping cat.![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
You are wrong,
Look, a Jumping Cat!
1. Look=Verb A=Preposition Jumping=Verb Cat=Noun
2. "A" tells you that there is only one cat.
3. Using a fragment like "Jumping Cat is not Grammatically Correct.
4. OWNED
1. Uh, ok.
2. What the heck does that prove? Besides, If you said "Look, Jumping Cat!" there would still be one cat, amirite?
3. Yes it does, we use that kind of stuff all the time. Like, "Then, Bob got onto the trail and passed a running man" or maybe, "Bob looked up into the sky and saw a twinkling star" It makes perfect sense.
4. Yesh, that is what I am saying to you right now. Owned.
Last edited by TheGameMaster1231 (2011-03-15 16:28:14)
Offline
Enzo1997 wrote:
It is impossible to say this sentence, without saying impossible.
I did it. I can do the impossible.
It is impossible to do nothing while existing. If you are doing nothing, you don't exist. If you are doing nothing but you do exist, you are doing something: Existing!
Offline
Who's the guy who said nothing is impossible? What a maroon
Offline
Enzo1997 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
To a color blind person, blue would look like purple.
Jumping cat.![]()
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
You are wrong,
Look, a Jumping Cat!
Look=Verb A=Preposition Jumping=Verb Cat=Noun
"A" tells you that there is only one cat.
Using a fragment like "Jumping Cat is not Grammatically Correct.
OWNED
I just learned this stuff in language arts class! So here's how you would break the sentence down:
Look, a jumping cat!
Subject= you (I know its not in there, but thats the subject)
Verb= look
Artice= a
now here's the jumping cat part:
Even though jumping is a verb word, its used in the sentence as a PARTICIPLE (a verb word used as an adjective). Therefore, jumping is an ADJECTIVE describing cat.
Its like if you say this:
The laughing children swam in the pool.
laughing is describing children, so its a participle.
So bottom line, if you say:
Look, a jumping cat!
jumping is describing cat, so its an adjective.
Last edited by MrsCullen2222 (2011-03-16 16:08:07)
Offline
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
Enzo1997 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
That's what it's doing, not what it is.![]()
You are wrong,
Look, a Jumping Cat!
1. Look=Verb A=Preposition Jumping=Verb Cat=Noun
2. "A" tells you that there is only one cat.
3. Using a fragment like "Jumping Cat is not Grammatically Correct.
4. OWNED1. Uh, ok.
2. What the heck does that prove? Besides, If you said "Look, Jumping Cat!" there would still be one cat, amirite?
3. Yes it does, we use that kind of stuff all the time. Like, "Then, Bob got onto the trail and passed a running man" or maybe, "Bob looked up into the sky and saw a twinkling star" It makes perfect sense.
4. Yesh, that is what I am saying to you right now. Owned.
1. No comment
2. "Look, jumping cat!" isn't grammaratically correct
3. Objection! A fragment is a piece of a sentence without the rest of the sentence. We really shouldn't use sentence fragments, but whole sentences.
4. OWNED!!
Offline
I sense a flame war in the making. On a minor scale of course. So maybe some ice would help.
Look, an ice cube!
Look=Verb An=Preposition ice=Noun cube=Noun

Offline
scratch_yoshi wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
Enzo1997 wrote:
scimonster wrote:
That's what it's doing, not what it is.
![]()
You are wrong,
1. Look=Verb A=Preposition Jumping=Verb Cat=Noun
2. "A" tells you that there is only one cat.
3. Using a fragment like "Jumping Cat is not Grammatically Correct.
4. OWNED1. Uh, ok.
2. What the heck does that prove? Besides, If you said "Look, Jumping Cat!" there would still be one cat, amirite?
3. Yes it does, we use that kind of stuff all the time. Like, "Then, Bob got onto the trail and passed a running man" or maybe, "Bob looked up into the sky and saw a twinkling star" It makes perfect sense.
4. Yesh, that is what I am saying to you right now. Owned.1. No comment
2. "Look, jumping cat!" isn't grammaratically correct
3. Objection! A fragment is a piece of a sentence without the rest of the sentence. We really shouldn't use sentence fragments, but whole sentences.
4. OWNED!!
1. ...
2. Oh, then I guess you're saying that "Look, running men!" isn't correct either?
3. So you're saying that we shouldn't use segment fragments at all? Because then there wouldn't be a sentence, and there obviously is a sentence, and that would result in a paradox, and paradoxes are not good... so... meh.
4. PWN'D
Offline
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
scratch_yoshi wrote:
TheGameMaster1231 wrote:
1. Uh, ok.
2. What the heck does that prove? Besides, If you said "Look, Jumping Cat!" there would still be one cat, amirite?
3. Yes it does, we use that kind of stuff all the time. Like, "Then, Bob got onto the trail and passed a running man" or maybe, "Bob looked up into the sky and saw a twinkling star" It makes perfect sense.
4. Yesh, that is what I am saying to you right now. Owned.1. No comment
2. "Look, jumping cat!" isn't grammaratically correct
3. Objection! A fragment is a piece of a sentence without the rest of the sentence. We really shouldn't use sentence fragments, but whole sentences.
4. OWNED!!1. ...
2. Oh, then I guess you're saying that "Look, running men!" isn't correct either?
3. So you're saying that we shouldn't use segment fragments at all? Because then there wouldn't be a sentence, and there obviously is a sentence, and that would result in a paradox, and paradoxes are not good... so... meh.
4. PWN'D
2. Look, Jumping cat just doesn't sound right. Don't argue with me on this topic, please.
3.
A fragment is a piece of a sentence without the rest of the sentence.
4. Do I really need to say... PWN'D!
Last edited by scratch_yoshi (2011-03-16 22:07:13)
Offline