Those are my two suggestions for today.
Stamp layering:
You know how you can move sprites to different layers? Maybe you should be able to do that with stamps too! For example, right now, if you have a sprite on the highest layer, and a sprite on the next layer down, if you stamp the top one, it will stamp on the lowest layer, below the next one down. With this suggestion, you would be able to stamp top one, and it would stamp on it's current layer, above the next sprite down.
Layer coordinate translation:
Right now, if you are going to move a group of sprites, you need to have them all move individually, at the same time. With this suggestion, in the stage, you would be able to translate a specific layer, moving all sprites and stamps on that layer. The block to do so would look like this:
Discuss.
Offline
I really like both of these. But to implement them, Scratch really needs better layer handling. Right now there's no easy way to get a sprite to go to a specific layer, or to know what layer it's on.
Offline
Also, 1 layer = 1 sprite the way scratch works
Offline
juststickman wrote:
Also, 1 layer = 1 sprite the way scratch works
![]()
well, I think you should be able to have multiple sprites on separate layers. Maybe there could be sub-layers?
Offline
sparks wrote:
Nice Idea... what would happen if two sprites on the same layer shared space on your screen?
Flickering? randomly display one above the other? Larger one on top? Big explosion?
![]()
Good question. Epic blend?
Offline
Harakou wrote:
sparks wrote:
Nice Idea... what would happen if two sprites on the same layer shared space on your screen?
Flickering? randomly display one above the other? Larger one on top? Big explosion?
![]()
Good question. Epic blend?
![]()
That or sub-layers but epic blend would be, well, epic.
Offline
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Harakou wrote:
sparks wrote:
Nice Idea... what would happen if two sprites on the same layer shared space on your screen?
Flickering? randomly display one above the other? Larger one on top? Big explosion?
![]()
Good question. Epic blend?
![]()
That or sub-layers
but epic blend would be, well, epic.
![]()
Or maybe like shadow combination.
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Harakou wrote:
Good question. Epic blend?![]()
That or sub-layers
but epic blend would be, well, epic.
![]()
Or maybe like shadow combination.
![]()
Offline
wow, this didn't get as many views as I wanted it to. I guess it's still a valid suggestion though...
EPIC 4 MONTH NECROBUMP!
Offline