Scratch

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-11 22:25:12

I personally we think we should focus on perfecting the menu now.

Necromaster · 2011-02-11 23:22:53

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
I personally we think we should focus on perfecting the menu now.

Definitely.

Hardmath123 · 2011-02-12 04:59:49

AmoebaMan wrote:
I blame it on all our programmers having vanished. And NOTHING getting done. Can we get the gosh darn site ironed out already so that we don't have to worry about it?

Ahem? I've made the menu base and a failed 3D engine. I think I've done the most Scratch programming for this so far...

majormax · 2011-02-12 08:01:10

Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
I personally we think we should focus on perfecting the menu now.
Definitely.

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-13 19:11:18

Bump! (That never happens sad )

Necromaster · 2011-02-13 21:55:13

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Bump! (That never happens )

I know right? sad Well, maybe we could make a server with ruby or something that panther could read? (For online play)

Hardmath123 · 2011-02-14 10:19:28

Ok, I perfected a 3D piece of rotatable/zoomable land. But when I try to single-frame it, Squeak runs out of memory (can't blame it, over 20,480kb is a lot)

Necromaster · 2011-02-14 15:50:08

Hardmath123 wrote:
Ok, I perfected a 3D piece of rotatable/zoomable land. But when I try to single-frame it, Squeak runs out of memory (can't blame it, over 20,480kb is a lot)

'Tis epically mathy...

Hardmath123 · 2011-02-15 06:31:30

Necromaster wrote:
Hardmath123 wrote:
Ok, I perfected a 3D piece of rotatable/zoomable land. But when I try to single-frame it, Squeak runs out of memory (can't blame it, over 20,480kb is a lot)
'Tis epically mathy...

Ever notice how my name is Hardmath123?

BTW, link:

AmoebaMan · 2011-02-15 10:28:17

admirable, but i think we're going for a 2.5D map. it's 2D, but the graphics make it appear 3D.

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-15 15:52:41

Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Bump! (That never happens )
I know right? Well, maybe we could make a server with ruby or something that panther could read? (For online play)

I've already got one. smile But if you have one with a lot of memory and fully want to dedicate it to CW, go right ahead! big_smile

Necromaster · 2011-02-15 16:32:38

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Bump! (That never happens )
I know right? Well, maybe we could make a server with ruby or something that panther could read? (For online play)
I've already got one. But if you have one with a lot of memory and fully want to dedicate it to CW, go right ahead!

I was making an MORPG with panther that involved a server I did out of ruby, but it kept crashing. tongue

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-17 17:20:51

AmoebaMan wrote:
admirable, but i think we're going for a 2.5D map. it's 2D, but the graphics make it appear 3D.

Yeah, but we were going to have 3d zooming, remember?

AmoebaMan · 2011-02-17 21:24:51

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:
admirable, but i think we're going for a 2.5D map. it's 2D, but the graphics make it appear 3D.
Yeah, but we were going to have 3d zooming, remember?

meaning what? just in and out right?

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-18 16:53:10

AmoebaMan wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:
admirable, but i think we're going for a 2.5D map. it's 2D, but the graphics make it appear 3D.
Yeah, but we were going to have 3d zooming, remember?
meaning what? just in and out right?

No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.

Necromaster · 2011-02-18 17:46:58

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Yeah, but we were going to have 3d zooming, remember?
meaning what? just in and out right?
No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.

You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done. sad

Hardmath123 · 2011-02-19 06:01:34

Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:

meaning what? just in and out right?
No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.
You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done.

My landform sim does zoom too.

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-19 09:59:23

Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:

meaning what? just in and out right?
No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.
You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done.

We're not using Scratch for the final product, remember?

ProgrammingFreak · 2011-02-19 10:05:19

so what now?

Phreak · 2011-02-20 21:42:40

Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:

meaning what? just in and out right?
No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.
You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done.

Warcraft III has REALLY impressive zooming.
But you can't zoom out much to get a full view of the battle hmm

Necromaster · 2011-02-21 00:18:13

Phreak wrote:
Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.
You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done.
Warcraft III has REALLY impressive zooming.
But you can't zoom out much to get a full view of the battle

I believe it is in machinima? No wait... That's wow. tongue But yeah, you can't get much of a view. So I end up fiddling with the Camera MPQ to make it like a more traditional RTS. tongue

TheSuccessor · 2011-02-21 06:43:50

Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
AmoebaMan wrote:

meaning what? just in and out right?
No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.
You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done.

My engine is designed to 3D RENDERING, not SPRITE MANIPULATIUON. That means we can use it! big_smile (I still haven't figured out Euler Angles yet though...)

Necromaster · 2011-02-21 11:21:50

TheSuccessor wrote:
Necromaster wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

No, it means that you can zoom in and have a 3D view of the battle.
You know what? I just realized that is IMPOSSIBLE without 3d rendering. If you mean zooming in like Warcraft 3 (look up some pics on google) it can't be done.
My engine is designed to 3D RENDERING, not SPRITE MANIPULATIUON. That means we can use it! (I still haven't figured out Euler Angles yet though...)

Manipulatiuon? Do you mean, Manipulation? (On Euler Angles, I'd checkout some of khan academies math vids. I think he has euler angles somewhere.

ScratchReallyROCKS · 2011-02-21 12:08:58

TheSuccessor wrote:
(I still haven't figured out Euler Angles yet though...)

There's this great thing called Google. It helps you find answers to your questions online! tongue (I'm assuming you've already tried that)

Necromaster · 2011-02-21 13:54:57

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
TheSuccessor wrote:
(I still haven't figured out Euler Angles yet though...)
There's this great thing called Google. It helps you find answers to your questions online! (I'm assuming you've already tried that)

Lol. tongue

Scratch

archived forums

#1176 2011-02-11 22:25:12

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

#1177 2011-02-11 23:22:53

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1178 2011-02-12 04:59:49

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1179 2011-02-12 08:01:10

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1180 2011-02-13 19:11:18

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

#1181 2011-02-13 21:55:13

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1182 2011-02-14 10:19:28

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

#1183 2011-02-14 15:50:08

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Hardmath123 wrote:

#1184 2011-02-15 06:31:30

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Necromaster wrote:

Hardmath123 wrote:

#1185 2011-02-15 10:28:17

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

#1186 2011-02-15 15:52:41

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1187 2011-02-15 16:32:38

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1188 2011-02-17 17:20:51

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1189 2011-02-17 21:24:51

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1190 2011-02-18 16:53:10

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

AmoebaMan wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1191 2011-02-18 17:46:58

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

AmoebaMan wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1192 2011-02-19 06:01:34

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1193 2011-02-19 09:59:23

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1194 2011-02-19 10:05:19

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

#1195 2011-02-20 21:42:40

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

AmoebaMan wrote:

#1196 2011-02-21 00:18:13

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread

Phreak wrote:

Necromaster wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

#1197 2011-02-21 06:43:50

Re: Chrono Wars discussion thread