Scratch

OK - first, a clone block!

we are  going to start again, using the source code, OK?

Last edited by ssss (2011-01-21 15:36:31)

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

k.

is this clone block going to be like all the others i have made before?

A little different?  It's got to create a variable called clone_Spritename 

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

well i was talking about like a clone costume thingy

explain?

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

ssss wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

well i was talking about like a clone costume thingy

explain?

this block clones the costume of the sprite.

yes, then it creates a variable for the clone 

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

Cool! So if you are going to do that, what do I do?

a get time/date  block    its not working for me 

and make the 2 extra tabs, if you know how 

Last edited by ssss (2011-01-21 15:57:50)

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

ok! But shouldn't one person at a time work on it? So we work on one .image file.

normally, yes - but i will just add my code to your image 

yes, this is so i we can both develop, and as i am only developing one block ... You get my point 

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

by tabs you mean like 'sound', 'backgrounds', and 'scripts'?

no, like Control and motion 

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

What are they going to be called?

one is code, one is color    (remember)

I want the variable to be called spriteName_LenghtOfList+1

how would i do that?

Last edited by ssss (2011-01-21 16:18:01)

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

ssss wrote:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

What are they going to be called?

one is code, one is color    (remember)

idk that we were going to keep it. Um, I have already done that in the old rkt. do you want to do it in that one?

mm... No, i'm remaking it using the source code and scratch skin 


I want the variable to be called spriteName_LenghtOfList+1

how would i do that?

Last edited by ssss (2011-01-21 16:19:15)

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

|   spriteName_LenghtOfList+1  |

?

why ?

I'm remaking it using the scratch source, so i can change the look a little D:

ProgrammingFreak wrote:

Its not working!

what's not working?