i made up this block and i think it has many practical uses for grammer translatings and fixing miss types plz check it out
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/pannulaa1/1545891
Offline
You could just use (letter (length of [ ]) = [ ]).
Offline
Jonathanpb wrote:
You could just use (letter (length of [ ]) = [ ]).
no this wouldnt work i tried it this is the reason it wont work (letter_of_) only allows 1 letter my block allows more than 1 letter for example (if (endof_=us) set case to nom singular) or such
Offline
if < (letter (length of [ ]) = [ ]) > and < (letter (length of ([ ]-1) = [ ]) >
Repeat as desired.
We don't need a block to make something we can already make, no matter how complicated. If we did, the whole screen would be crowded with unnecessary blocks.
We don't even need "next costume"
Last edited by kayybee (2011-01-20 23:42:17)
Offline
pannulaa2 wrote:
fine but i still think id be a good block
I agree. Many blocks can be made using other blocks, including this one, but that doesn't mean they should be included. A block like this would speed some projects up.
Offline
scmb1 wrote:
pannulaa2 wrote:
fine but i still think id be a good block
I agree. Many blocks can be made using other blocks, including this one, but that doesn't mean they should be included. A block like this would speed some projects up.
+1 You'd be surprised how many blocks have workarounds (I was actually going to post a guide in them, but got bored ).
Offline