Scratch

antimonyarsenide · 2011-01-17 20:03:25

-hings) [/title]

http://scratch.mit.edu/users/showfriends/139
use that URL, and manipulate the number at the end. You'll find that nothing before 139 works, and everything after that should work tongue

Makes sense that the first person is andres tongue

At least I think order of signing up is how that works. Except that Nio is like 447232.

You can also check a person's number by pressing "see more" on the galleries thing on their userpage.

My number is 381675.

Discuss.

TuffGhost · 2011-01-17 20:12:14

The first scratch member :OOO

Last edited by TuffGhost (2011-01-17 20:15:08)

lilacfuzz101 · 2011-01-17 20:13:57

I'm 527,758! tongue Interesting. i wonder who 123,456 is? *goes to check*

ihaveamac · 2011-01-17 20:14:11

First user

TuffGhost · 2011-01-17 20:15:46

ihaveamac wrote:
First user

TuffGhost wrote:
The first scratch member :OOO

lilacfuzz101 · 2011-01-17 20:15:48

123,456 has no friends and the name is iee25000. i did a search and nothing came up. ah well tongue

Kileymeister · 2011-01-17 20:23:38

Poor itchy.

ssss · 2011-01-17 20:26:44

Kileymeister wrote:
Poor itchy.

Code:

You stole the words right out of my mouth!  That's the game!

Last edited by ssss (2011-01-17 20:27:12)

Scratchthatguys · 2011-01-17 20:35:58

All numbers before 139 were deleted/inappropriate accounts. Makes sense.

AtomicBawm3 · 2011-01-17 20:47:27

Lol, 666 is angel01234.

Aidan · 2011-01-17 20:47:51

AtomicBawm3 wrote:
Lol, 666 is angel01234.

lol

kingofdallamas · 2011-01-17 20:53:16

Cool! smile

johndo77 · 2011-01-17 20:59:30

The 1337th user:

http://scratch.mit.edu/users/casey/

antimonyarsenide · 2011-01-17 21:17:57

Scratchthatguys wrote:
All numbers before 139 were deleted/inappropriate accounts. Makes sense.

How does that make sense?

AtomicBawm3 wrote:
Lol, 666 is angel01234.

hahaha

kimmy123 · 2011-01-17 21:19:32

I am number 115022 cool

Jonathanpb · 2011-01-17 21:28:06

90500, five digits ftw big_smile

Why did that first account thing have a gibberish name? Couldn't they think of anything better? tongue

Kileymeister · 2011-01-17 21:45:35

Jonathanpb wrote:
90500, five digits ftw

Why did that first account thing have a gibberish name? Couldn't they think of anything better?

That's not gibberish, that's Squarkzian for "User".

My number is 100222. Nice, even number.

pika100chu · 2011-01-18 13:48:07

here is currently the newest user.

antimonyarsenide · 2011-01-18 16:51:34

pika100chu wrote:
here is currently the newest user.

Now it's this guy.

The-Whiz · 2011-01-18 17:22:23

#25122...

antimonyarsenide · 2011-01-18 17:25:29

There's also a different number for the forums tongue Mouse over the "posts" thing under someone's registration date thing.
My forum id is 81313.

scratch_yoshi · 2011-01-18 19:08:26

53713 on the forums, 310192 on the main site. big_smile

ian528 · 2011-01-18 19:15:08

The scratcher of the year is: This guy. His number is 2011! wink

Last edited by ian528 (2011-01-18 19:15:20)

jfmlove6 · 2011-01-21 16:47:36

Im number 612413.

GlitchSprite · 2011-01-21 16:53:04

545441

Dang

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2011-01-17 20:03:25

Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#2 2011-01-17 20:12:14

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#3 2011-01-17 20:13:57

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#4 2011-01-17 20:14:11

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#5 2011-01-17 20:15:46

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

ihaveamac wrote:

TuffGhost wrote:

#6 2011-01-17 20:15:48

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#7 2011-01-17 20:23:38

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#8 2011-01-17 20:26:44

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

Kileymeister wrote:

Code:

#9 2011-01-17 20:35:58

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#10 2011-01-17 20:47:27

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#11 2011-01-17 20:47:51

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

AtomicBawm3 wrote:

#12 2011-01-17 20:53:16

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#13 2011-01-17 20:59:30

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#14 2011-01-17 21:17:57

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

Scratchthatguys wrote:

AtomicBawm3 wrote:

#15 2011-01-17 21:19:32

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#16 2011-01-17 21:28:06

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#17 2011-01-17 21:45:35

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

Jonathanpb wrote:

#18 2011-01-18 13:48:07

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#19 2011-01-18 16:51:34

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

pika100chu wrote:

#20 2011-01-18 17:22:23

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#21 2011-01-18 17:25:29

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#22 2011-01-18 19:08:26

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#23 2011-01-18 19:15:08

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#24 2011-01-21 16:47:36

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

#25 2011-01-21 16:53:04

Re: Another way to see who the first scratch users were (and many other t-

Board footer