Scratch

PW132 wrote:

TuffGhost wrote:

PW132 wrote:

BaronVonBlade wrote:

PS3 has no games

No it- Wait, I...AGREE? 

Minecraft, Tron 2.0, and games by Valve.

Owned.

dude have you ever actually tried playing any of the valve games on a mac
it is painful

i tried minecraft on a mac and it kept crashing because my mac refuses to update java, and as much as i would like to play it in lieu of my pc while it doesnt have a graphics card there is absolutely no way that the mac is going to do anything it doesnt feel like doing
heck i couldnt even run pesterchum on that hunk of junk

also oh boy its tron, one the first games ever i bet playing 2.0 on a mac will be so great

Minecraft ran fine on my Mac from 2009, Tron 2.0 is a FPS game that has nothing to do with the 1982 arcade game other than it is based on the same movie as the arcade game, and in other words you just have a cruddy Mac and are making assumptions.

are you trying to tell me that a computer shouldnt be considered a bad gaming platform because after 12 years of barely supporting any gaming whatsoever its fanbase has annoyed people like valve enough to develop games for them

PW132 wrote:

TuffGhost wrote:

PW132 wrote:

Minecraft ran fine on my Mac from 2009, Tron 2.0 is a FPS game that has nothing to do with the 1982 arcade game other than it is based on the same movie as the arcade game, and in other words you just have a cruddy Mac and are making assumptions.

are you trying to tell me that a computer shouldnt be considered a bad gaming platform because after 12 years of barely supporting any gaming whatsoever its fanbase has annoyed people like valve enough to develop games for them

No. Where did I say that again? Oh yeah. Nowhere.

you said it when you started defending macs dude

the proof...............
is in the pudding

Easy on the caps lock dude bro man

....What

PW132 wrote:

TuffGhost wrote:

PW132 wrote:

No. Where did I say that again? Oh yeah. Nowhere.

you said it when you started defending macs dude

the proof...............
is in the pudding

No, I did not intend that anywhere.

thats kinda hard to defend when weve been going back and forth about it for several minutes

BTW, YES, PC's do have more games

this is true

YES, PC's are good for things too, (Like gaming)

they are in fact quite exceptional at gaming dude

this is why steam existed in the first place

but Macs still do not suck as a gaming platform.

you have failed to provide any proof-pudding to back up this statement

in fact you just sorta proved the opposite

Also, ever heard of freeware?

yeah its the stuff macs hate because the are so closed source it hurts to use them nowadays

PW132 wrote:

TuffGhost wrote:

PW132 wrote:

No, I did not intend that anywhere.

thats kinda hard to defend when weve been going back and forth about it for several minutes

Well I didn't. deal.

BTW, YES, PC's do have more games

this is true
Yes.

YES, PC's are good for things too, (Like gaming)

they are in fact quite exceptional at gaming dude

this is why steam existed in the first place
Yes.

but Macs still do not suck as a gaming platform.

you have failed to provide any proof-pudding to back up this statement

in fact you just sorta proved the opposite
No, I just siad PC's can be better. That still does not say Mac's suck at it.

Also, ever heard of freeware?

yeah its the stuff macs hate because the are so closed source it hurts to use them nowadays

O rly? I have plenty of Mac freeware games.

ok jegus thanks for taking no measures to separate what you said from what i said

my response pretty much boils down to
you have been defending macs since i suggested them in this thread

if macs are pcs only competitor in computer console gaming obviously pointing out the pros of pcs isnt going to help your case

freeware games on macs are either slow or they take the processing power of peggle knights


listen dude as much as i hate pointing out the faults in your defense the heating has turned off in here and i have to retreat to a comfy bed

Can you stop quoting the big walls of text just to add nothing to them

1.Apple Pippin
2.Mattel HyperScan
3.Nokia N-Gage

@Tonks: You seem biased    People don't just care about how realistic the games are, alot of the games have amazing storylines. But you don't have an xbox so you wouldn't know lol.

@Luigi: You've got to be kidding me, you're just flat out biased. Eyetoy is so old, there is no way it can compete with Kinect. Kinect barely has any games on it at the moment because it just came out. With HD graphics on a 3rd gen console, the possiblities outdo anything you could do on Eyetoy.

Last edited by steppenwulf (2010-12-16 18:41:37)

Luigitailsdoll45 wrote:

...
DSI & DSI XL-I don't like that you can't play GBA games on it.It's not too retro.

Why does everyone care about the GBA slot? Those games are almost 5 years old at this point (the last game for GBA [in Japan] was manufactured in 06 [USA in 08]). Just boot your old DS.

Ok, well now that that's over:
...

Luigitailsdoll45 wrote:

Kinect-I bet it can't beat Eyetoy.

Lol silly kids are silly. I'd like to see the Eyetoy do this

Last edited by Targethero (2010-12-16 15:35:23)

1) CD-i



The reason? The second controller port is on the BACK of the console, not the front. >.> (at least it gave us YouTube Poop)

2) N-Gage



The reason? To switch games, you had to REMOVE THE BATTERY (Not to mention, using it as a phone makes it look like a taco is glued to your head. >XD)

3) Virtual Boy



The reason? To tell you the truth, I actually LIKE this console. The reason it's on this list is that it has side-affects like eye strain, neck strain, headaches, dizziness, and others. In fact, Nintendo actually ENCOURAGED people to take frequent brakes because of these side affects.