ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
It says it's only available for Windows, but I can use it on a Mac too.
EDIT: What the heck?
http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/9332 … 4at434.png
this block needs one more input.
really? Do you have boot camp or something then? It uses loads of .exe's
________________
Oh an incase anyone didn't notice...
* Click on the stage to get latest news
* Go to help > table generator and you get a table genertor!
* Check out the stack block input too! (credit to TheSuccessor)
Offline
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
It says it's only available for Windows, but I can use it on a Mac too.
EDIT: What the heck?
http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/9332 … 4at434.png
this block needs one more input.really? Do you have boot camp or something then? It uses loads of .exe's
Bootcamp let's you run Windows natively on a Mac. No, I just used the .image. (which doesn't let me do everything) I'll get it on my Virtualbox Windows 7 someday.
Offline
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
It says it's only available for Windows, but I can use it on a Mac too.
EDIT: What the heck?
http://img842.imageshack.us/img842/9332 … 4at434.png
this block needs one more input.really? Do you have boot camp or something then? It uses loads of .exe's
Bootcamp let's you run Windows natively on a Mac. No, I just used the .image. (which doesn't let me do everything) I'll get it on my Virtualbox Windows 7 someday.
Oh I see. The compiler or anything else won't work though
Offline
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
really? Do you have boot camp or something then? It uses loads of .exe'sBootcamp let's you run Windows natively on a Mac. No, I just used the .image. (which doesn't let me do everything) I'll get it on my Virtualbox Windows 7 someday.
Oh I see. The compiler or anything else won't work though
I know.
I'm working on the wiki article.
Offline
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Bootcamp let's you run Windows natively on a Mac. No, I just used the .image. (which doesn't let me do everything) I'll get it on my Virtualbox Windows 7 someday.Oh I see. The compiler or anything else won't work though
I know.
I'm working on the wiki article.
Thanks. I'll add to it later. Could you give me a link too so I can post it on the website?
Offline
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
Oh I see. The compiler or anything else won't work thoughI know.
I'm working on the wiki article.Thanks. I'll add to it later. Could you give me a link too so I can post it on the website?
I'm not done yet. Are you a Scratch wiki editor too?
Offline
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
I know.
I'm working on the wiki article.Thanks. I'll add to it later. Could you give me a link too so I can post it on the website?
I'm not done yet. Are you a Scratch wiki editor too?
Yeah I've got an account.
Offline
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
Thanks. I'll add to it later. Could you give me a link too so I can post it on the website?I'm not done yet. Are you a Scratch wiki editor too?
Yeah I've got an account.
Here, you can do the rest: http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/Web_Blox
Offline
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:
I'm not done yet. Are you a Scratch wiki editor too?Yeah I've got an account.
Here, you can do the rest: http://wiki.scratch.mit.edu/wiki/Web_Blox
Thanks SSR, I really appreciate it.
Offline
meowmeow55 wrote:
Also, instead of using separate blocks for the beginning and end of tags (like <html> and </html>), why not have C blocks?
Well?
Offline
meowmeow55 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
Also, instead of using separate blocks for the beginning and end of tags (like <html> and </html>), why not have C blocks?
Well?
Probably because forming them would be a huge pain.
Offline
Hi! I just had a look at web blox, and it's amazing! I love the idea of being able to use scratch style to code html and other web languages!
two problems I do have with it though:
the major one is that a block type language like this is supposed to make coding easier, why not have an easy-to-understand name for a block rather than the actual code? for instance, why have a block called <br /> if you could have the same working block called "create a break"? It would make it so much easier to understand! Maybe add it as a switchable option?
the second thing is that I think open tags like <html> <html /> and such should be C blocks to make things easier!
altogether great job though!
Offline
sparks wrote:
the major one is that a block type language like this is supposed to make coding easier, why not have an easy-to-understand name for a block rather than the actual code? for instance, why have a block called <br /> if you could have the same working block called "create a break"? It would make it so much easier to understand! Maybe add it as a switchable option?
It already is a switchable option. Look at the "L" and "P" buttons at the top.
Offline
sparks wrote:
Hi! I just had a look at web blox, and it's amazing! I love the idea of being able to use scratch style to code html and other web languages!
two problems I do have with it though:
the major one is that a block type language like this is supposed to make coding easier, why not have an easy-to-understand name for a block rather than the actual code? for instance, why have a block called <br /> if you could have the same working block called "create a break"? It would make it so much easier to understand! Maybe add it as a switchable option?
the second thing is that I think open tags like <html> <html /> and such should be C blocks to make things easier!
altogether great job though!
1. <br /> is for people who know html.
2. That i s already discussed!
Offline
the compiler is .exe, Macs can't run those files.
Offline
gbear605 wrote:
the compiler is .exe, Macs can't run those files.
Yes, we've established that already.
Offline
meowmeow55 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
Also, instead of using separate blocks for the beginning and end of tags (like <html> and </html>), why not have C blocks?
Well?
I did consider this but the way it works is that each block writes that line to a temp file. I will however try and find a way around this for the next release!
Offline
Daffy22 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
Also, instead of using separate blocks for the beginning and end of tags (like <html> and </html>), why not have C blocks?
Well?
I did consider this but the way it works is that each block writes that line to a temp file. I will however try and find a way around this for the next release!
Make the C block write the open tag then have all the center blocks write to the file and then write the end tag. This code should go into the C block.
Offline
Daffy22 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
Also, instead of using separate blocks for the beginning and end of tags (like <html> and </html>), why not have C blocks?
Well?
I did consider this but the way it works is that each block writes that line to a temp file. I will however try and find a way around this for the next release!
I had the same problem when I started working on a version of Panther for programming microchips - couldn't get it to write something to a temporary file when a C block finished...
Offline
sparks wrote:
Daffy22 wrote:
meowmeow55 wrote:
Well?I did consider this but the way it works is that each block writes that line to a temp file. I will however try and find a way around this for the next release!
I had the same problem when I started working on a version of Panther for programming microchips - couldn't get it to write something to a temporary file when a C block finished...
Yeah, thats the major problem.
I'll ask LS97 and see if he knows.
Offline