Scratch

ob6160 wrote:

I agree why not a grandpa    Or even better grandma 
Or Brother, Mother,Father I could go on for years 


OB6160

siblings wouldn't work, because they did not have you. But yeah, anything else except siblings and your children or cousins or uncles and aunties would work. I could go on for years as well!

ob6160 wrote:

I agree why not a grandpa    Or even better grandma 
Or Brother, Mother,Father I could go on for years 


OB6160

Or you!

Happypieman wrote:

If you went back in time and killed your granny before your parents were born, what would be the outcome?
Discussion.

My theory is that then your parents wouldn't be born, then you wouldn't, but that wouldn't change the fact that you killed your granny, so you wouldn't be born again afterwards. Some people will say, then you couldn't have killed you granny because you weren't born! But your granny would STILL BE DEAD!! Even if you never existed, your granny would STILL BE DEAD!!

You know, i question the whole, killing grannies thing. Why does time travveling alays have to do with killing your grannies!?!

P.S. this is a fictional post: Time Travelling into the past is not possible, seeing as time can only move in one direction.

after you killed your grandmother you wouldn't exist therefor you couldn't have killed your grandmother and if you didn't kill your grandmother you wouldn't have not existed. so basicaly you would "re-start" from where you began.

I think that somewhere in nature is a law that prevents you from traveling backwards in time, because then someone from some time period would mess something up. I know that if you were near a black hole for a while, time around you will travel much faster, thus causing you to age slower than everyone/everything. But I don't think that there is a way to just go back in time.

Happypieman wrote:

If you went back in time and killed your granny before your parents were born, what would be the outcome?
Discussion.

My theory is that then your parents wouldn't be born, then you wouldn't, but that wouldn't change the fact that you killed your granny, so you wouldn't be born again afterwards. Some people will say, then you couldn't have killed you granny because you weren't born! But your granny would STILL BE DEAD!! Even if you never existed, your granny would STILL BE DEAD!!

You know, i question the whole, killing grannies thing. Why does time travveling alays have to do with killing your grannies!?!

P.S. this is a fictional post: Time Travelling into the past is not possible, seeing as time can only move in one direction.

Did you get this from a book? Its really just a paradox..

But that CAN'T happen. The first time period was BC and the second was AD, the one we're in now. Time machines won't be invented until the next time period, AAD (After After... whatever the D means.)

BUT.

The next time period isn't AAD. It's ADA (After *whatever D means* Again)!

So because the time period AAD will never exist, time machines will never exist, therefor making time untravelable.

Well, actually, if time travel to the past were possible, then you wouldn't be able to kill your granny, because you can't change history. You'll only make what's supposed to happen, happen.

TheGameMaster1231 wrote:

But that CAN'T happen. The first time period was BC and the second was AD, the one we're in now. Time machines won't be invented until the next time period, AAD (After After... whatever the D means.)

BUT.

The next time period isn't AAD. It's ADA (After *whatever D means* Again)!

So because the time period AAD will never exist, time machines will never exist, therefor making time untravelable.

Very true. Time travel is possible, but impractical at the same time. It's almost impossible for a human to travel in some sort of car that can go close to the speed of light.

If only we could get there by driving a DeLorean with a flux capacitor at 88 miles per hour.

Last edited by banana500 (2010-11-28 14:31:47)

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

That's simple- it creates a new world that you can affect, but can not affect you. In the new world, you were never born, but in the real world, you're still alive.

The real question is this- say two people travel back in time to the same place/time, but both travel at different times (e.g. one goes at 5:00 PM, the other travels at 1:00 AM). Will they meet in the past, even though they left the future at different times?

kimmy123 wrote:

TheGameMaster1231 wrote:

But that CAN'T happen. The first time period was BC and the second was AD, the one we're in now. Time machines won't be invented until the next time period, AAD (After After... whatever the D means.)

BUT.

The next time period isn't AAD. It's ADA (After *whatever D means* Again)!

So because the time period AAD will never exist, time machines will never exist, therefor making time untravelable.

D = Dimension?

The "D" in "AD" is "Domini"- AD means "Anno Domini" (it's latin).

Actually, the thing is, if a cyborg goes back in time to kill your mother before you were born, then you'd probably just disappear from sight forever. That's not the case. Like I said in my earlier post, you can't change history.

You watch Ray william johnson, don't you?

Also, I agree with the Hp version of time traveling, like Sun-rise.

GlitchSprite wrote:

TheGameMaster1231 wrote:

(After After... whatever the D means.)

AD means Anno Domini which is 'Year of our Lord' in Latin

It means this is the 2010th year of our Lord Christ

A lot of people say it means 'After Death' but that would not make any sense because BC means 'Before Christ'

And if I have this right Jesus is like 40

So it is impossible to grow to 40 in 1 year

Therefore it is illogical to presume that Jesus was born and died in year 0 aloPe

Gosh dude get your facts right

That makes sense, but he was 33.