Offline
Yes
I copied and pasted articles from there to write my sixth grade assessment paper
Last edited by GlitchSprite (2010-11-27 20:03:58)
Offline
Yes, but it depends on the topic.
Offline
YESYESYESYES!! I love wikipedia!
I just have to convice my mom...
Offline
rufflebee wrote:
Nope
Probably because I enjoy adding false information to random pages, therefore making them unreliable
Unless you call my imagination reliable
I used to do that to the pokemon wiki. (I hate pokemon)
militarydudes wrote:
Yes, but it depends on the topic.
Which ones would you not trust?
GlitchSprite wrote:
Yes
I copied and pasted articles from there to write my sixth grade assessment paper
Was that allowed?
Offline
Depends on what the topic is, but usually Yes.
Offline
majormax wrote:
I used to do that to the pokemon wiki. (I hate pokemon)
HOW DARE YOU!?!?!
Offline
majormax wrote:
GlitchSprite wrote:
Yes
I copied and pasted articles from there to write my sixth grade assessment paperWas that allowed?
Who cares
I passed with good comments
Offline
majormax wrote:
militarydudes wrote:
Yes, but it depends on the topic.
Which ones would you not trust?
Usually ones that are political or religious. It depends on how bias they look, and how much info they give out on each view of the subject. Most of the time they're pretty reliable, but many a time I'll find a topic that seems to praise one thing or another, rather than give out the information without any input or opinion by the author.
Last edited by militarydudes (2010-11-27 20:16:04)
Offline
Yes. Wikipedia is always the first place I go to to look up something (even before Google!).
Offline
Yes
I mean whoever writes that much about onigiri seriously would run out of lies to post

Offline
Nope. Anyone can edit it, and sometimes, it isn't edited back to it's correct state. No teachers trust it, and neither do i.

Offline
I once edited an article to say that ducks were 5 ft tall, and they LOVED eating humans. :3
So no, not really...
Offline
I usually do, since the community is good with keeping the content accurate. I usually use other sources though, for additional information as well as to corroborate Wikipedia's information. But I don't use it for reports, just for looking up stuff I'm interested in.
Offline
Survivorduck wrote:
I once edited an article to say that ducks were 5 ft tall, and they LOVED eating humans. :3
So no, not really...
some are

Offline
I usually do. Here's why:
1. You can tell if information is fake.
2. Nobody really edits it to put in fake information.
3. It's called wikipedia... that's a pretty cool name.
Offline
12three wrote:
I usually do. Here's why:
1. You can tell if information is fake.
2. Nobody really edits it to put in fake information.
3. It's called wikipedia... that's a pretty cool name.![]()
So if there was something that had a cool name that was fake you would think it was real?
And a lot of people edits it to put in fake information.
Offline
kimmy123 wrote:
12three wrote:
I usually do. Here's why:
1. You can tell if information is fake.
2. Nobody really edits it to put in fake information.
3. It's called wikipedia... that's a pretty cool name.![]()
So if there was something that had a cool name that was fake you would think it was real?
And a lot of people edits it to put in fake information.
Actually I just added the last one because I wanted to get three reasons in there.
Offline
Yeah, i copied and pasted my whole report and my teacher (Who is awesome BTW , he lets us sit on couches in class) didn't call me in for it. FYI my report was on Peanut Butter

Offline
kimmy123 wrote:
I just edited a wiki page and added a random link xD
Which one? xD
Offline