This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2010-11-25 21:49:02

XLR8tion
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-08-28
Posts: 5

New improvement in the scratch module

you could put a fastforward script box so that you can just fastforward to certain places in a music or play or somethin i've been neding that! also an action section where you can choose some boxes like "blow up" or "flip" or "throw up" because sometimes some scratchers have  hard time making a sprite doing certain things

Offline

 

#2 2010-11-25 22:06:27

Harakou
Community Moderator
Registered: 2009-10-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: New improvement in the scratch module

I agree that we need better sound controls. All we have now are start and stop. As for your "action" suggestion, I strongly disagree. It's too general for one (what actions would you have? There's a lot of possibilities.) and too difficult. (What about custom sprites?) Besides, it's makes it too easy. The purpose of Scratch is to make stuff yourself, not combine a bunch of pre-made, cookie-cutter options.


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&return=image&link1=http://i.imgur.com/OZn2RD3.png&link2=http://i.imgur.com/duzaGTB.png&link3=http://i.imgur.com/CrDGvvZ.png&link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&link5=http://i.imgur.com/ZKJF8ac.png

Offline

 

#3 2010-11-25 22:08:39

ScratchReallyROCKS
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: New improvement in the scratch module

Harakou wrote:

I agree that we need better sound controls. All we have now are start and stop. As for your "action" suggestion, I strongly disagree. It's too general for one (what actions would you have? There's a lot of possibilities.) and too difficult. (What about custom sprites?) Besides, it's makes it too easy. The purpose of Scratch is to make stuff yourself, not combine a bunch of pre-made, cookie-cutter options.

Yep. This is why I think they should get rid of the
[blocks]<if on edge, bounce>[/blocks]
block. It's too convenient.

Last edited by ScratchReallyROCKS (2010-11-25 22:08:53)


http://imageshack.us/a/img694/3806/sigmad.png

Offline

 

#4 2010-11-25 22:16:48

Harakou
Community Moderator
Registered: 2009-10-11
Posts: 1000+

Re: New improvement in the scratch module

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Harakou wrote:

I agree that we need better sound controls. All we have now are start and stop. As for your "action" suggestion, I strongly disagree. It's too general for one (what actions would you have? There's a lot of possibilities.) and too difficult. (What about custom sprites?) Besides, it's makes it too easy. The purpose of Scratch is to make stuff yourself, not combine a bunch of pre-made, cookie-cutter options.

Yep. This is why I think they should get rid of the
[blocks]<if on edge, bounce>[/blocks]
block. It's too convenient.

Not really. It's commonly used and you'd have to do some rather annoying math otherwise. I'm not saying everything should be done for you, but I think that block is here to stay.


http://www.blocks.scratchr.org/API.php?action=random&amp;return=image&amp;link1=http://i.imgur.com/OZn2RD3.png&amp;link2=http://i.imgur.com/duzaGTB.png&amp;link3=http://i.imgur.com/CrDGvvZ.png&amp;link4=http://i.imgur.com/POEpQyZ.png&amp;link5=http://i.imgur.com/ZKJF8ac.png

Offline

 

#5 2010-11-25 22:35:02

ScratchReallyROCKS
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-04-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: New improvement in the scratch module

Harakou wrote:

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Harakou wrote:

I agree that we need better sound controls. All we have now are start and stop. As for your "action" suggestion, I strongly disagree. It's too general for one (what actions would you have? There's a lot of possibilities.) and too difficult. (What about custom sprites?) Besides, it's makes it too easy. The purpose of Scratch is to make stuff yourself, not combine a bunch of pre-made, cookie-cutter options.

Yep. This is why I think they should get rid of the
[blocks]<if on edge, bounce>[/blocks]
block. It's too convenient.

Not really. It's commonly used and you'd have to do some rather annoying math otherwise. I'm not saying everything should be done for you, but I think that block is here to stay.

what's so hard about this?

http://img252.imageshack.us/img252/6850/script.gif

Doesn't matter. I deleted it anyway.

Last edited by ScratchReallyROCKS (2010-11-25 22:35:34)


http://imageshack.us/a/img694/3806/sigmad.png

Offline

 

Board footer