HERE! CLICK HERE!
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/OldWhee … er/1315325
Last edited by OldWheezerGeezer (2010-10-25 21:16:29)
Offline
A lot of people have suggested this, and I think it's going to happen.
-12three-
Offline
Wait couldn't you do this.
<repeat until><( <{ Variable }> <=> 1 )>
Do something
<end>
<when I receive[ Whatever
<set{ Variable }to( 1
<end>
Last edited by what-the (2010-09-25 23:09:56)
Offline
what-the wrote:
Wait couldn't you do this.
<repeat until><( <{ Variable }> <=> 1 )>
Do something
<end>
<when I receive[ Whatever
<set{ Variable }to( 1
<end>
That's what I do-but wouldn't it just be easier to have what is stated above?
-12three-
Offline
A very useful block mean not have to make so many variables instead.
Offline
This should be made. Alhough it is possible to avoid it having a block is much simpler and there are probably some cases where only a block would work. Either way, it would be far more useful than the <forever if> block.
Offline
you could do that but it would be kind of annoying and might slow the project down to create an all new variable for this purpose.
what-the wrote:
Wait couldn't you do this.
<repeat until><( <{ Variable }> <=> 1 )>
Do something
<end>
<when I receive[ Whatever
<set{ Variable }to( 1
<end>
Offline
pickle123 wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/pickle123/1290615 I have had the same idea for a long time. Darn, I wanted to put a picture here but I'm too much of a "New Scratcher" >
![]()
You have to make 100 comments!
Offline
kinker wrote:
pickle123 wrote:
http://scratch.mit.edu/projects/pickle123/1290615 I have had the same idea for a long time. Darn, I wanted to put a picture here but I'm too much of a "New Scratcher" >
![]()
You have to make 100 comments!
Actually, they have to wait about 15 days.
Offline
<mod please close topic>
Offline
OldWheezerGeezer wrote:
<mod please close topic>
Closed. ^^
Offline