Aidan wrote:
svinnik wrote:
Considering what you did on Nationstates in the TBG's. I'd say I won't vote for you.
*cough* You're one to talk *cough* I hope you're enjoying your stay in the Rejected Realms. :)
That was my brother.

Offline
speech speech speech speech!
Last edited by Nexstudent (2010-09-19 08:26:37)

Offline
svinnik wrote:
Aidan wrote:
svinnik wrote:
Considering what you did on Nationstates in the TBG's. I'd say I won't vote for you.
*cough* You're one to talk *cough* I hope you're enjoying your stay in the Rejected Realms. :)
That was my brother.
That was your nation, which you should have put on Vacation Mode.
Offline
Aidan wrote:
svinnik wrote:
Aidan wrote:
*cough* You're one to talk *cough* I hope you're enjoying your stay in the Rejected Realms. :)That was my brother.
That was your nation, which you should have put on Vacation Mode.
I know.
Please unban me.

Offline
svinnik wrote:
Aidan wrote:
svinnik wrote:
That was my brother.That was your nation, which you should have put on Vacation Mode.
I know.
![]()
Please unban me.
We are currently discussing it in the RMB. I'm pro-unbanning, BTW. We can talk about this in a Telegram.[/NS discussion]
Offline
Aidan wrote:
svinnik wrote:
Aidan wrote:
That was your nation, which you should have put on Vacation Mode.I know.
![]()
Please unban me.We are currently discussing it in the RMB. I'm pro-unbanning, BTW. We can talk about this in a Telegram.[/NS discussion]
Okay. Sending you a Telegram.

Offline
Ace-Of-Diamonds wrote:
Subh wrote:
Sorry for that part but it was only that CSVH's first post, (which was filled with things you wont recognize Scratch with) that made me angry.
I did apologize later.After being told 3 times. What do you mean things you won't recognize Scratch with? It makes complete sense. Yes, this is on topic as we're discussing why I should change my mind and vote for you.
BTW, I apologised by my own to everyone just a few mintes before the topic was closed. However, I did not thank CVSH then, which I did when Cheddargirl told me to do.
By things you would not recognize Scratch with, I meant the dark ages and trolling and that part of the thing. There still might be trolling and that sort of thing but it is surely a lot lesser than CSVH and I can certainly say that he is not the only one who can help Scratch (unlike what he said) come out from this problem
svinnik wrote:
Considering what you did on Nationstates in the TBG's. I'd say I won't vote for you.
I dont think I did anything to nationstates rpg. It was just that After the war, PWF never updated and thats why the prg died away. Even I did not like that Nationstates rpg died away.
Even if I did anything to it, I dont think that you should base your votes upon that. ome on, it was just a RPG (where we were enemies.) Now, please vote according to MY characteristics, PLEASE
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
Offline
THANKS. Will you consider me ???
Pls. change your signature
Offline
"- I am older than most of the Scratchers (at 15 yrs) and hence(I assume), more mature."
That blew it.
Offline
Thanks for your comment. I shall remove that line immediately
Offline
Your a good guy, but no offense... being a mod isn't for you IMHO, just by what the speech tells me about your personality.
Saying you hate the people who make pointless projects, and the "- I am older than most of the Scratchers (at 15 yrs) and hence(I assume), more mature." kinda ruined it for me. I know you removed it, but you still thought and said it. And you can't unsay something. The speech does say a lot of positive things about you, but just how it words things and some lines are extremely 'un-modly', if you know what I mean (made up word ftw). Just removing the bad things doesn't always fix it, sadly.
Also some things you have done in the past, I really can't stop remembering you. Some when I hear 'Subh' I think of 'the one who did ____' which really lowers down your modly figure. Very sorry
I really like you as a scratcher, (one of my favorite TBGers), but as a mod? Sorry, but no vote from me.
I hope I didn't sound like a jerk, I was just expressing what I felt...
Keep in mind, I am not never going to vote for you. I will still consider you, maybe later. I am not giving you up. But now is not the time, lets wait until your more ready, or 'prove' yourself. Not literally.
Last edited by wiimaster (2010-10-02 09:03:00)

Offline
Thanks For Your Opinion
Offline
svinnik wrote:
You don't act 15. Maybe 10, but not 15.
I wouldn't go as low as 10... but if I didn't know any better I wouldn't think Subh was eligable to run for moderator with the 14+ rule.
Offline
Even if I did act as 10, I AM ELIGIBLE
Offline
Offline
Subh wrote:
Even if I did act as 10, I AM ELIGIBLE
![]()
And because you're eligible, we should vote for you? Not really.
I remember when you were spamming and begging on the Scratch Wiki thread on announcements begging for an account - what kind of maturity is that?
Offline
Maturity never comes all of a sudden. It takes time to build up, as it did in my case.
The incident that you are mentioning is quite old and belongs to the time when I was newly introduced to Forums. Unfortunately, I did not know then that I was spamming , or else I would have definitely stopped. I hope that I am more mature than I was before, including when I first posted my nomination.
Thank you.
Offline
Just in case you don't know, your signature is over 150 pixels tall.
Offline