Scratch
archived forums
#51 2010-09-29 18:35:10
- lilacfuzz101
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
what? there's an age limit? 
Offline
#52 2010-09-29 18:36:25
- lilacfuzz101
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
oh for mod XD sorry 
[/fail]
Last edited by lilacfuzz101 (2010-09-29 18:39:54)
Offline
#53 2010-09-29 18:36:26
- demosthenes
- Retired Community Moderator
- Registered: 2008-02-19
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
lilacfuzz101 wrote:
what? there's an age limit?
If you wish to enter in the elections to become a Scratch Community Moderator, you must be of at least 14 years of age.
I've taken a long hiatus, but I still visit sometimes. Give me some time to answer any messages you post on my projects!
Offline
#54 2010-09-29 18:37:45
- Blade-Edge
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-06-13
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
illusionist wrote:
COMPLETELY UNFAIR.
My "genius 2-year old, moronic 40-year old" analogy was completely ignored too.
I take it the retirement was forced lol
CLASSYOffline
#55 2010-09-29 18:46:44
- illusionist
- Retired Community Moderator
- Registered: 2008-07-02
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
Blade-Edge wrote:
illusionist wrote:
COMPLETELY UNFAIR.
My "genius 2-year old, moronic 40-year old" analogy was completely ignored too.I take it the retirement was forced lol
mmmmhhhmmmm.
Offline
#56 2010-09-29 18:48:51
- soupoftomato
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
illusionist wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
illusionist wrote:
COMPLETELY UNFAIR.
My "genius 2-year old, moronic 40-year old" analogy was completely ignored too.I take it the retirement was forced lol
mmmmhhhmmmm.
No one saw this but:
However what is unfair is the dethroning of illusionist and Dazachi, they have never had a problem with the stuff they have been exposed to and have proved themselves worthy of the position. I will attempt to at least argue this case to the ST.60secondrulesucks
Last edited by soupoftomato (2010-09-29 18:49:02)
I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos
Offline
#58 2010-09-29 18:51:14
- lilacfuzz101
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
illusionist wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
illusionist wrote:
COMPLETELY UNFAIR.
My "genius 2-year old, moronic 40-year old" analogy was completely ignored too.I take it the retirement was forced lol
mmmmhhhmmmm.
do you think they may re-instate you when you get to 14 with out having to get re-elected? you do a really good job!
Offline
#59 2010-09-29 18:54:10
- illusionist
- Retired Community Moderator
- Registered: 2008-07-02
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
lilacfuzz101 wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
I take it the retirement was forced lol
mmmmhhhmmmm.
do you think they may re-instate you when you get to 14 with out having to get re-elected? you do a really good job!
I don't honestly think I really want to serve under a system like this anymore, but that is just my opinion.
Lets see how things turn out in two years. 
soupoftomato wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
I take it the retirement was forced lol
mmmmhhhmmmm.
No one saw this but:
However what is unfair is the dethroning of illusionist and Dazachi, they have never had a problem with the stuff they have been exposed to and have proved themselves worthy of the position. I will attempt to at least argue this case to the ST.60secondrulesucks
You are my new best friend. 
Offline
#61 2010-09-29 18:56:03
- illusionist
- Retired Community Moderator
- Registered: 2008-07-02
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
rufflebee wrote:
illusionist wrote:
I don't honestly think I really want to serve under a system like this anymore, but that is just my opinion.
A system like what?
I just disagree with some decisions made by the team.
Offline
#62 2010-09-29 19:01:44
- KalinaStar
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-03-14
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
Unfair! 
Offline
#64 2010-09-29 19:17:04
#65 2010-09-29 19:19:08
- militarydudes
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-09-12
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
illusionist wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
illusionist wrote:
COMPLETELY UNFAIR.
My "genius 2-year old, moronic 40-year old" analogy was completely ignored too.I take it the retirement was forced lol
mmmmhhhmmmm.
Wait, ur 13? I always thought you were like 15
Last edited by militarydudes (2010-09-29 19:20:56)
__m. .m__ KILROY WAS HERE
U
Offline
#66 2010-09-29 19:20:03
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
illusionist wrote:
You're really against this rule, aren't you? And just because you're getting demoted. Hmmph.
Offline
#68 2010-09-29 19:24:46
- ScratchReallyROCKS
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-04-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
I don't think it's fair.
Offline
#69 2010-09-29 19:35:23
- lilacfuzz101
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
i made a suggestion on the official announcement page. do you think that would work?
here is a link to the post- click here
edit- 600th post! whoo!
Last edited by lilacfuzz101 (2010-09-29 19:51:28)
Offline
#70 2010-09-29 19:41:55
- soupoftomato
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2009-07-18
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
militarydudes wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
I take it the retirement was forced lolmmmmhhhmmmm.
Wait, ur 13? I always thought you were like 15
He is 11.
I'm glad to think that the community will always be kind and helpful, the language will always be a fun and easy way to be introduced into programming, the motto will always be: Imagine, Program, Share - Nomolos
Offline
#72 2010-09-29 19:47:00
- lilacfuzz101
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
Usatt1337 wrote:
Wait, what is this limit on?
you must be 14 to be a moderator on the website now.
Offline
#74 2010-09-29 19:49:18
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
soupoftomato wrote:
militarydudes wrote:
illusionist wrote:
mmmmhhhmmmm.Wait, ur 13? I always thought you were like 15
He is 11.
You are both wrong. He is 12.
Offline
#75 2010-09-29 19:53:12
- lilacfuzz101
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2010-05-22
- Posts: 1000+
Re: Poll: 14 year limit unfair?
i edited my post above but this is the idea i gave on the official forum click here or read here:
I understand why you would set an age limit- but let's be honest; 14-year-olds can be immature as any other age. and, as we've seen with illusionist, lower ages can be just as mature. and (as it's been said) people may lie about their age when they sign up. i understand that this was a hard desicion, but i think it should be more based on the person's track record.
what if... (and i understand if this would get too complicated-or be abused in some way) there were two divisions of moderators? 14+ and 14-. when reporting something, the reporter could check a box if they think it should be handeled by an older mod. younger mods would handle stuff like people being mean/flames/ect. normal stuff. and the... more maturity needed reports would be handled by 14+. the reports that get checked wouldn't show up... wherever the mods get alerted.
Offline