Scratch

rdococ · 2010-01-30 16:51:24

Mr_X wrote:
cheddargirl wrote:
DawnLight wrote:
I completely conquer with this! There is no reason for 15 days of joining within the scratch community being a long amount of time, if your original intentions are good! Great idea!
DawnLight, do you mean the ' word "concur", not "conquer"?
LOL

@Rocdoc You were probably here before andresmh put this in

You are true, Mr_X.

Louis2018 · 2010-01-30 21:55:41

Ralphjos wrote:
andresmh posted:
In order to prevent unnecessary posts...
Like what? and How will enabeling signatures stop this?

Regards,
Ralphjos

They mean that it will cause people not to make unnecessary forum topics and posts to get 50 posts after they sign up so they can get a signiture.

articsky · 2010-02-04 18:57:05

this is my ferste sig lol

Louis2018 · 2010-02-21 08:10:58

Louis2018 wrote:
Ralphjos wrote:
andresmh posted:
In order to prevent unnecessary posts...
Like what? and How will enabeling signatures stop this?

Regards,
Ralphjos
They mean that it will cause people not to make unnecessary forum topics and posts to get 50 posts after they sign up so they can get a signiture.

sorry I mispelled signature

hpluvr97 · 2010-06-10 17:39:24

Okay, I think someone said one thing somewhere, another person said another, everyone got mixed up, blah blah blah, I wanna clear this up.

Can we link to adoptables (dragons), and/or sites we made if they're non-profit??

If not, then I need to edit my siggy...

recycle49 · 2010-08-01 10:10:01

I like it it doesnt let spamers spam ^^

TriTeam · 2010-09-08 19:21:50

andresmh wrote:
We might change the limit to more or less days.

I say you should just have signatures as soon as people start out, because otherwise it's like, hey I created this account yesterday but I don't have a signature!

Or you could change it so you have signatures after like 5 posts or whatever, makes sure they're actually posting.

gettysburg11 · 2010-09-08 19:30:40

TriTeam wrote:
andresmh wrote:
We might change the limit to more or less days.
I say you should just have signatures as soon as people start out, because otherwise it's like, hey I created this account yesterday but I don't have a signature!

Or you could change it so you have signatures after like 5 posts or whatever, makes sure they're actually posting.

But the problem with making it 5 posts is that a commercial spammer could just post their link 5 times and then they have a sig to advertise in too.
I like 15 days personally, it gives enough time to see if that user is really in it for the long haul and deserves a signature.

Jonathanpb · 2010-09-09 00:53:31

TriTeam wrote:
You could change it so you have signatures after like 5 posts or whatever, makes sure they're actually posting.

That's way too easy for commercial spammers...

cheddargirl · 2010-09-09 01:03:50

Jonathanpb wrote:
TriTeam wrote:
You could change it so you have signatures after like 5 posts or whatever, makes sure they're actually posting.
That's way too easy for commercial spammers...

Hmm, maybe a combo of the 50 post rule and the 15 day rule for siggies? tongue

Lucario621 · 2010-09-09 15:25:30

cheddargirl wrote:
Jonathanpb wrote:
TriTeam wrote:
You could change it so you have signatures after like 5 posts or whatever, makes sure they're actually posting.
That's way too easy for commercial spammers...
Hmm, maybe a combo of the 50 post rule and the 15 day rule for siggies?

That would be nice smile

moriswatson · 2010-09-15 06:22:25

I think it's very good approach. Now community members can easily share their thoughts without spamming

EC0416 · 2010-09-16 01:03:21

but... if no one interested with what they put in the signature, it's not annoy right?

cheddargirl · 2010-09-16 14:17:21

EC0416 wrote:
but... if no one interested with what they put in the signature, it's not annoy right?

All signatures have to comply with the Terms of Use for the website (so no inappropriate or offensive content is allowed in signatures). Aside from that: backlinks for commercial purposes (SEO spam) are a big no-no. There have also been cases where images in signatures had to be disabled because they caused other problems (such as epilepsy, or malware issues).

BlackParade101 · 2010-10-11 10:10:32

floatingmagictree wrote:
I don't like this rule at all... the 51 post rule worked fine.

Me too.

I hate being a n00b.

coolstuff · 2010-10-11 10:12:11

BlackParade101 wrote:
floatingmagictree wrote:
I don't like this rule at all... the 51 post rule worked fine.
Me too.

I hate being a n00b.

Well - you're a new Scratcher because in the past, we've had a lot of people come over here and post some pretty malicious links and just create account after account after we banned them. This rule prevents them from doing so.

ruggboy1 · 2010-11-01 09:49:29

Good! People would be making spam (like "fqjhshbh") on everything if we didn't change this! Like mine?

turntechGodhead · 2010-11-01 12:53:01

yeah i passed it a while ago pretty cool i guess man

BlackParade101 · 2010-11-06 10:00:46

coolstuff wrote:
BlackParade101 wrote:
floatingmagictree wrote:
I don't like this rule at all... the 51 post rule worked fine.
Me too.

I hate being a n00b.
Well - you're a new Scratcher because in the past, we've had a lot of people come over here and post some pretty malicious links and just create account after account after we banned them. This rule prevents them from doing so.

Sudden change of mind now. I now agree with the "50 post rule only gave spammers a goal" analogy wink

CloneCommando1 · 2011-04-14 20:32:16

With all due respect, there are probably hundreds of other websites where you can have a sig in the forums without the wait. If they can't do it here, then I suspect that they would just move on to the next website on the list.

GameHutSoftware · 2011-04-15 11:17:38

Maybe this can be closed... since there's a new system.

mmww · 2011-04-15 11:52:09

whats this convorsation about anyway?

scimonster · 2011-04-15 11:53:39

Should this be closed now that it is no longer applicable?

TVflea · 2011-04-16 00:53:52

scimonster wrote:
Should this be closed now that it is no longer applicable?

probably

Paddle2See · 2011-04-16 04:16:07

So this rule was changed so that New Scratchers now get a signature after they become Scratchers. I think we'll close this topic now since the new system is discussed in other places.

Scratch

archived forums

#51 2010-01-30 16:51:24

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

Mr_X wrote:

cheddargirl wrote:

DawnLight wrote:

#52 2010-01-30 21:55:41

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

Ralphjos wrote:

#53 2010-02-04 18:57:05

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#54 2010-02-21 08:10:58

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

Louis2018 wrote:

Ralphjos wrote:

#55 2010-06-10 17:39:24

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#56 2010-08-01 10:10:01

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#57 2010-09-08 19:21:50

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

andresmh wrote:

#58 2010-09-08 19:30:40

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

TriTeam wrote:

andresmh wrote:

#59 2010-09-09 00:53:31

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

TriTeam wrote:

#60 2010-09-09 01:03:50

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

Jonathanpb wrote:

TriTeam wrote:

#61 2010-09-09 15:25:30

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

cheddargirl wrote:

Jonathanpb wrote:

TriTeam wrote:

#62 2010-09-15 06:22:25

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#63 2010-09-16 01:03:21

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#64 2010-09-16 14:17:21

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

EC0416 wrote:

#65 2010-10-11 10:10:32

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

floatingmagictree wrote:

#66 2010-10-11 10:12:11

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

BlackParade101 wrote:

floatingmagictree wrote:

#67 2010-11-01 09:49:29

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#68 2010-11-01 12:53:01

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#69 2010-11-06 10:00:46

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

coolstuff wrote:

BlackParade101 wrote:

floatingmagictree wrote:

#70 2011-04-14 20:32:16

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#71 2011-04-15 11:17:38

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#72 2011-04-15 11:52:09

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#73 2011-04-15 11:53:39

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

#74 2011-04-16 00:53:52

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

scimonster wrote:

#75 2011-04-16 04:16:07

Re: Signatures enabled only after 15 days of activity in the forums

Board footer