Scratch

Paddle2See wrote:

Just straight out asking for a Yes/No answer is a pretty dangerous move sometimes...but I see that you have gotten the feedback you requested. 

Now, perhaps, you might want to expand your question and ask why or why not people feel as they do.  That might be more useful to you as it would help you identify areas that you might want to work on 

One last thing, before you spend a lot of time deciding whether or not to run:  There is a possibility that there will be a minimum age requirement for Community Moderators in the next election.  You might want to wait for the official announcement to see if you are eligible before you worry about whether you should run.

Thank you, Paddle2See 

rufflebee wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

There is a possibility that there will be a minimum age requirement for Community Moderators in the next election.

I support that.

What the faker said. (Kidding about the faker bit.)

Paddle2See wrote:

Just straight out asking for a Yes/No answer is a pretty dangerous move sometimes...but I see that you have gotten the feedback you requested. 

Now, perhaps, you might want to expand your question and ask why or why not people feel as they do.  That might be more useful to you as it would help you identify areas that you might want to work on 

One last thing, before you spend a lot of time deciding whether or not to run:  There is a possibility that there will be a minimum age requirement for Community Moderators in the next election.  You might want to wait for the official announcement to see if you are eligible before you worry about whether you should run.

I see we are bringing age discrimination in this time. Something the Scratch Team once said they never do in selecting moderators. There shouldn't be an age requirement, you should just do it like last time, the Scratch Team chose the final candidates for it anyway, so why disallow people from trying?

Unless of course it's something like no 8 year olds, which I would agree with.

andresmh wrote:

In selecting these members, age, gender and location are not important. What is important is the level of maturity, respect and mentoring role that people have played in the community.

I will lose my faith in you if you discriminate an unfair age.

JeanTheFox wrote:

RobotKitty wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

Theres a difference between having opinions and being mean.

Thank god, rufflebee actually sees reason.

Saying no is not mean, it is our opinion. If you can't see the reason in this, then you aren't very fitting for a moderator.

Look, I'm sorry if that came out wrong.

It's just that Shugo has only gotten no's, and that would kind of hurt my feelings if I were in her position. I was not disrespecting your opinion.

The reason is because she always... How do I say this... Spams. And she does act pretty childish. I mean, who would want a moderator that posts threads saying they have crushes on random Scratchers they don't even know, like Aidan?

JeanTheFox wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Just straight out asking for a Yes/No answer is a pretty dangerous move sometimes...but I see that you have gotten the feedback you requested. 

Now, perhaps, you might want to expand your question and ask why or why not people feel as they do.  That might be more useful to you as it would help you identify areas that you might want to work on 

One last thing, before you spend a lot of time deciding whether or not to run:  There is a possibility that there will be a minimum age requirement for Community Moderators in the next election.  You might want to wait for the official announcement to see if you are eligible before you worry about whether you should run.

I see we are bringing age discrimination in this time. Something the Scratch Team once said they never do in selecting moderators. There shouldn't be an age requirement, you should just do it like last time, the Scratch Team chose the final candidates for it anyway, so why disallow people from trying?

Unless of course it's something like no 8 year olds, which I would agree with.

andresmh wrote:

In selecting these members, age, gender and location are not important. What is important is the level of maturity, respect and mentoring role that people have played in the community.

I will lose my faith in you if you discriminate an unfair age.

The six months thing is to stop spammers, plus if someone who no one knew came out of nowhere and ran for mod the day after they join, would anyone really vote for them?

Also, the age thing is a completely different story. Nobody should have to say their age online just to become a mod.

Oh, I thought they meant real age. 

I figured he meant real age since the user age was already in the election last time.

rufflebee wrote:

Star_the_fox wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

I support that.

What the faker said. (Kidding about the faker bit.)

lolwut? Yes, I read the gainsboro, but I don't understand 

Sort of a Sonic and Shadow reference: They look a bit alike, so they call each other fakers. Our names are alike, therefore I have branded you as a... FAKER.

lol. Now, I'll go back to watching this thing, it's better thaan cable

DaGamez wrote:

I can't wait till Aidan sees this.

I have seen this.

Star_the_fox wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

Star_the_fox wrote:

What the faker said. (Kidding about the faker bit.)

lolwut? Yes, I read the gainsboro, but I don't understand 

Sort of a Sonic and Shadow reference: They look a bit alike, so they call each other fakers. Our names are alike, therefore I have branded you as a... FAKER.

Ah, I see 

Eh.....no.


But do what you want, go for it if you desire. No one's stopping you.

(Well, kind of. But ignore that.~)

Last edited by littletonkslover (2010-09-11 20:54:38)

J0j2 wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Just straight out asking for a Yes/No answer is a pretty dangerous move sometimes...but I see that you have gotten the feedback you requested. 

Now, perhaps, you might want to expand your question and ask why or why not people feel as they do.  That might be more useful to you as it would help you identify areas that you might want to work on 

One last thing, before you spend a lot of time deciding whether or not to run:  There is a possibility that there will be a minimum age requirement for Community Moderators in the next election.  You might want to wait for the official announcement to see if you are eligible before you worry about whether you should run.

Paddle2See, you are a fantastic Moderator/Admin. I agree with everything here. If there were more yous on scratch, this community would be the best place ever, lol!

This community is the best place ever! 

Aidan wrote:

J0j2 wrote:

Paddle2See wrote:

Just straight out asking for a Yes/No answer is a pretty dangerous move sometimes...but I see that you have gotten the feedback you requested. 

Now, perhaps, you might want to expand your question and ask why or why not people feel as they do.  That might be more useful to you as it would help you identify areas that you might want to work on 

One last thing, before you spend a lot of time deciding whether or not to run:  There is a possibility that there will be a minimum age requirement for Community Moderators in the next election.  You might want to wait for the official announcement to see if you are eligible before you worry about whether you should run.

Paddle2See, you are a fantastic Moderator/Admin. I agree with everything here. If there were more yous on scratch, this community would be the best place ever, lol!

This community is the best place ever! 

Riiight.

Blade-Edge wrote:

When I think of Scratch, I always imagine eating a hamburger, then biting down and findingg a tooth in the patty

And the reason you're postingg this on an irrelevant topic is?

Last edited by JeanTheFox (2010-09-11 21:06:20)

Oh, okay