Scratch
archived forums
#26 2010-08-18 14:05:04
Re: dotNetScratch
If it were completely done, then you would need to compare it to the squeak one.
Wait a second, isnt ScratchPlugin written in C?
(the one that comes with the source)
And you are going to write the execution engine in C, right?
Last edited by bbbeb (2010-08-18 14:06:38)
Back in my day.... there were no laws that censored the internet... now, there are.... nah.
Offline
#28 2010-08-19 15:50:20
- markyparky56
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-03-20
- Posts: 1000+
Re: dotNetScratch
LS97 wrote:
i wouldnt be so certain about the advantage of this thing. it would just have the code written as c instead of squeak. probably with a limited functionality. i'm not supporting
I don't think this is something of a support or not support, as far as I can tell, this is going ahead.
Offline
#29 2010-09-06 11:12:07
Re: dotNetScratch
I suppose it's better for some who know .Net but those who don't it's just the same as having to learn squeak! I am already starting to learn and understand squeak but having learn .NET means I have to learn something else 
. I would rather just keep squeak.
Offline
#30 2010-09-07 16:01:46
Re: dotNetScratch
markyparky56 wrote:
Billybob-Mario wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
Why... what?Why is it being made? What can it do that Scratch can't?
Probably it'll be faster and just simply better. But ofcourse, it'll be unuasable for mac users.
Good I have Windows. 
Offline
#31 2010-09-08 14:17:43
- markyparky56
- Scratcher
- Registered: 2008-03-20
- Posts: 1000+
Re: dotNetScratch
Daffy22 wrote:
I suppose it's better for some who know .Net but those who don't it's just the same as having to learn squeak! I am already starting to learn and understand squeak but having learn .NET means I have to learn something else
You don't have to learn .NET, but, if I dare say, it is easier than Squeak. Depends on the language, VB, VC++, VC# and a few others.
Offline