I'm guessing I won't have to do anything for a while
Offline
I still don't like the judging technique for bonuses.
What does the comment say in the Scratch-MO image which qualifies development?
(Don't worry, I can't cheat, I mean, you can just do versions on a method or the changes and figure out if they cheated, and my changesets are named in the format "nXIII-Month DD-Title of Changeset")
EDIT: Ahaha, found it... good one:
makeAClass
1 = 2 ifTrue: [^ nil].
^ 'SMO'
You should be more careful about changesets ... 'working'
Last edited by nXIII (2010-08-30 08:25:30)
Offline
^^
i took the cs out when i made the change!
never mind tohugh, it's not th only one.
Offline
and yes i know you can check the cs. but what if they take it away... see?
Offline
Maybe it should be in the rules if you delete that, you loose -2 medal points. I'd need a judge's approval.
Offline
LS97 wrote:
and yes i know you can check the cs. but what if they take it away... see?
But they can't really take away the changes file...
But you can delete portions.
Last edited by nXIII (2010-08-30 12:58:43)
Offline
^^ you can move it while you're editing that single bit. then put it back. but i know how to spot that
there's no getting away from ME! (and im a judge in case you forgot)
Offline
LS97 wrote:
^^ you can move it while you're editing that single bit. then put it back. but i know how to spot that
![]()
there's no getting away from ME! (and im a judge in case you forgot)
No, you can remove it from the changeset entirely. Then doing versions will just say "no versions"
Offline
majormax wrote:
Maybe it should be in the rules if you delete that, you loose -2 medal points. I'd need a judge's approval.
^
|
| That
Offline
^^ ok! i agree! if you delete the cs you loose 4 medal points, if you break the rules by not startin from yuor own you're disqualifed
Offline
LS97 wrote:
^^ ok! i agree! if you delete the cs you loose 4 medal points, if you break the rules by not startin from yuor own you're disqualifed
Added.
@Reese-o I let anybody be a judge.
Offline
majormax wrote:
@Reese-o I let anybody be a judge.
until th places are full
Offline
LS97 wrote:
^^ ok! i agree! if you delete the cs you loose 4 medal points, if you break the rules by not startin from yuor own you're disqualifed
But I just lose 2 points because I started the 16th, right? Or can I subtract that from my free week and not lose any points?
Last edited by nXIII (2010-09-01 17:12:45)
Offline
Hmmmm...... you bring up a point. LS97?
Offline
majormax wrote:
Hmmmm...... you bring up a point. LS97?
No, I'm saying, I have a free week, so can I take four days from that week (leaving me three free days, I started on the 16th of August) and not receive any points off?
Offline
Well, a judge will have to decide. But still what if someone doesn't use the thing LS97 made, so they don't have a CS?
Offline
majormax wrote:
Well, a judge will have to decide. But still what if someone doesn't use the thing LS97 made, so they don't have a CS?
I have all my changesets named with the date, and my changes file has the dates I started. It's proof that I started when I said I did. Why would I date my changesets if I wanted to lie about starting early?
Offline
Well, wait for LS97, he'll decide how many points you loose.
Offline
i would say, nXIII has a valid excuse. he had no access to squeak during one week, so started earlier. for that i have two options.
a) no medals lost but no extra days afterwards
b) -3 medals.
i say it's up to nXIII to decide...
Offline
nXIII wrote:
majormax wrote:
Well, a judge will have to decide. But still what if someone doesn't use the thing LS97 made, so they don't have a CS?
I have all my changesets named with the date, and my changes file has the dates I started. It's proof that I started when I said I did. Why would I date my changesets if I wanted to lie about starting early?
and yes, if they don't use mine, i'll check the changeset. if there is no changeset, it means they have something to hide, because they took it away purposely (the 1.4 source code includes a changeset). and i can easily spot if someone has taken changes from other mods and included in theirs
Offline
Offline
LS97 wrote:
i would say, nXIII has a valid excuse. he had no access to squeak during one week, so started earlier. for that i have two options.
a) no medals lost but no extra days afterwards
b) -3 medals.
i say it's up to nXIII to decide...
I think we should do the subtraction and leave me three days. What you're suggesting is unfair (I have a disadvantage because I have less time)
Offline
Offline
nXIII wrote:
LS97 wrote:
i would say, nXIII has a valid excuse. he had no access to squeak during one week, so started earlier. for that i have two options.
a) no medals lost but no extra days afterwards
b) -3 medals.
i say it's up to nXIII to decide...I think we should do the subtraction and leave me three days. What you're suggesting is unfair (I have a disadvantage because I have less time)
i let you decide on purpose. in fact it would have been pretty stupid if you'd chosen the other option - 3 more days for -2 medals
Offline