This is a read-only archive of the old Scratch 1.x Forums.
Try searching the current Scratch discussion forums.

#1 2010-08-28 23:17:10

Jwosty
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-19
Posts: 500+

[notag] and [/notag]

I think there should be a BBCode tag like the <nowiki> and </nowiki> tags in the Scratch Wiki, like, say, [notag] and [/notag]... (The <nowiki> tag is like the [code] tag, except without the code box) What do you think?  hmm


http://i39.tinypic.com/18ert5.png Google it.  smile

Offline

 

#2 2010-08-28 23:18:50

Chrischb
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-07-24
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

I support - no more of... uh:

Code:

[[b][/b]color=red]text goes here[/url]

I fall: It's a tragedy. You fall: It's comedy.
Hmph enjoy your fall - I get a lovely spring... without pans of new leaves.

Offline

 

#3 2010-08-28 23:21:14

Jwosty
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-19
Posts: 500+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

Chrischb wrote:

I support - no more of... uh:

Code:

[[b][/b]color=red]text goes here[/url]

EXACTLY.


http://i39.tinypic.com/18ert5.png Google it.  smile

Offline

 

#4 2010-08-29 00:17:53

fg123
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-11-13
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

Support!  big_smile


Hai.

Offline

 

#5 2010-08-29 00:24:34

ihaveamac
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-09-22
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

Just do this:

[color=red]Some Text ABC abc 123[/color]
Quote to see the secret.


~ihaveamac - visit ihaveamac.net

Offline

 

#6 2010-08-29 02:18:01

Chrischb
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-07-24
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

That's what I meant in my earlier post. xD But it really does get annoying, and think about throwing in a bunch of tags...

colorbolditaliclink/italic.linkchangecolor/boldetc.


I fall: It's a tragedy. You fall: It's comedy.
Hmph enjoy your fall - I get a lovely spring... without pans of new leaves.

Offline

 

#7 2010-08-29 09:26:21

coolstuff
Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-03-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

I don't really mind having to put tags inside of tags  smile

Offline

 

#8 2010-08-29 12:35:55

rdococ
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-10-11
Posts: 1000+

Offline

 

#9 2010-08-29 13:20:01

aljowen
Scratcher
Registered: 2010-05-07
Posts: 79

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

rdococ wrote:

ihaveamac wrote:

Just do this:

[color=red]Some Text ABC abc 123[/color]
Quote to see the secret.

Lol.

I want to see the secret

Offline

 

#10 2010-08-29 15:52:05

hmnwilson
Scratcher
Registered: 2007-07-04
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

I support. It's easier than putting tags inside tags, and looks better than the code tags.

aljowen wrote:

rdococ wrote:

ihaveamac wrote:

Just do this:

[color=red]Some Text ABC abc 123[/color]
Quote to see the secret.

Lol.

I want to see the secret

Just do what ihaveamac said, and quote it.

Last edited by hmnwilson (2010-08-29 15:52:34)


I'm taking a break from Scratch until 2.0 comes out. Any messages sent between then and now probably won't be read - sorry.
(Oct. 20, 2011)

Offline

 

#11 2010-08-29 21:33:18

Jwosty
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-19
Posts: 500+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

coolstuff wrote:

I don't really mind having to put tags inside of tags  smile

I don't, unless I have to do it a lot.  hmm

Last edited by Jwosty (2010-08-30 09:09:06)


http://i39.tinypic.com/18ert5.png Google it.  smile

Offline

 

#12 2010-08-30 02:24:10

Chrischb
Scratcher
Registered: 2008-07-24
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

coolstuff wrote:

I don't really mind having to put tags inside of tags  smile

I do.  big_smile

Wikicode is so much cooler than BBCode. ^^


I fall: It's a tragedy. You fall: It's comedy.
Hmph enjoy your fall - I get a lovely spring... without pans of new leaves.

Offline

 

#13 2010-08-30 09:10:26

Jwosty
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-19
Posts: 500+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

Chrischb wrote:

coolstuff wrote:

I don't really mind having to put tags inside of tags  smile

I do.  big_smile

Wikicode is so much cooler than BBCode. ^^

Yea. The only thing is, wikicode takes longer to learn (At least for me). Probably because there are more tags...  tongue

Last edited by Jwosty (2010-08-30 09:10:48)


http://i39.tinypic.com/18ert5.png Google it.  smile

Offline

 

#14 2010-08-30 11:30:20

coolstuff
Community Moderator
Registered: 2008-03-06
Posts: 1000+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

Chrischb wrote:

coolstuff wrote:

I don't really mind having to put tags inside of tags  smile

I do.  big_smile

Wikicode is so much cooler than BBCode. ^^

Wikicode is confusing :S

I like BBCode because it's so similar to HTML, and is really easy to learn. Wikicode is just... Blegh.

Anyways, I really don't think typing tags inside of tags to make tags show up as tags is much of an issue at the moment... remember, the purpose of the forums is for Scratch, not to learn forum code.  tongue

Offline

 

#15 2010-08-30 17:58:21

Jwosty
Scratcher
Registered: 2009-12-19
Posts: 500+

Re: [notag] and [/notag]

coolstuff wrote:

Chrischb wrote:

coolstuff wrote:

I don't really mind having to put tags inside of tags  smile

I do.  big_smile

Wikicode is so much cooler than BBCode. ^^

Wikicode is confusing :S

I like BBCode because it's so similar to HTML, and is really easy to learn. Wikicode is just... Blegh.

Anyways, I really don't think typing tags inside of tags to make tags show up as tags is much of an issue at the moment... remember, the purpose of the forums is for Scratch, not to learn forum code.  tongue

Hmm. You do have a point.  big_smile


http://i39.tinypic.com/18ert5.png Google it.  smile

Offline

 

Board footer