Scratch

Sunrise-Moon · 2010-08-25 22:30:46

@Everone: 'tis only a joke.

Last edited by Sunrise-Moon (2010-08-25 22:44:10)

rufflebee · 2010-08-25 22:31:26

In two minutes, it is only possible to get two posts.

Last edited by rufflebee (2010-08-26 11:10:58)

steppenwulf · 2010-08-25 22:32:23

Sunrise-Moon wrote:
http://i821.photobucket.com/albums/zz14 … omic-1.png

PARADOOOOOOXXXXXX@$#@!$#

PW132 · 2010-08-25 22:33:10

Seriously, almost EVERY topic here has SOME sort of point, and NOBODY (except maybe you for the second) thinks that way. For both panels.

DaGamez · 2010-08-25 22:33:34

rufflebee wrote:
In two minutes, it is only possible to get two posts.

No, everyone will post. There can be 2,000 in 2 minutes if 1,000 users post every minute for 2 minutes.

Sunrise-Moon · 2010-08-25 22:33:50

rufflebee wrote:
In two minutes, it is only possible to get two posts. Most people know that, since everyone seems to complain about the sixty second rule nowadays.

Not if 100 people post xD

rufflebee · 2010-08-25 22:35:15

DaGamez wrote:
rufflebee wrote:
In two minutes, it is only possible to get two posts.
No, everyone will post. There can be 2,000 in 2 minutes if 1,000 users post every minute for 2 minutes.

For a single account on the main forums on the Scratch website, it is only possible to post twice in two minutes. There.

m71134 · 2010-08-25 22:35:31

I don't think a lot of people think that when they post. Most threads get 2-10 posts in two minutes. tongue

DaGamez · 2010-08-25 22:37:18

rufflebee wrote:
DaGamez wrote:
rufflebee wrote:
In two minutes, it is only possible to get two posts.
No, everyone will post. There can be 2,000 in 2 minutes if 1,000 users post every minute for 2 minutes.
For a single account on the main forums on the Scratch website, it is only possible to post twice in two minutes. There.

Nope, what about Moderators and Scratch Team
On another note, you never said a single account before. No soap, radio.

rufflebee · 2010-08-25 22:40:21

DaGamez wrote:
rufflebee wrote:
DaGamez wrote:

No, everyone will post. There can be 2,000 in 2 minutes if 1,000 users post every minute for 2 minutes.
For a single account on the main forums on the Scratch website, it is only possible to post twice in two minutes. There.
Nope, what about Moderators and Scratch Team
On another note, you never said a single account before.

For a regular Scratch forumer, (Which excludes Moderators and the Scratch Team) it is only possible to post a maximum of two times in two minutes. roll
I do not care if I never specified that before, because it was what I meant tongue

DaGamez · 2010-08-25 22:41:28

rufflebee wrote:
DaGamez wrote:
rufflebee wrote:

For a single account on the main forums on the Scratch website, it is only possible to post twice in two minutes. There.
Nope, what about Moderators and Scratch Team
On another note, you never said a single account before.
For a regular Scratch forumer, (Which excludes Moderators and the Scratch Team) it is only possible to post a maximum of two times in two minutes.
I do not care if I never specified that before, because it was what I meant

I never knew that, you should´ve expressed your meaning (I´m turning into a Blade-like monstah tongue )

Sunrise-Moon · 2010-08-26 01:26:04

rufflebee wrote:
DaGamez wrote:
rufflebee wrote:

For a single account on the main forums on the Scratch website, it is only possible to post twice in two minutes. There.
Nope, what about Moderators and Scratch Team
On another note, you never said a single account before.
For a regular Scratch forumer, (Which excludes Moderators and the Scratch Team) it is only possible to post a maximum of two times in two minutes.
I do not care if I never specified that before, because it was what I meant

But I meant multiple people would post in it. xD, let's discontinue this argument. Did I just put a comma after xD?

rufflebee · 2010-08-26 01:44:55

Oh, I see. I misread the comic, apparently.

Last edited by rufflebee (2010-08-26 01:45:33)

08jackt · 2010-08-26 05:50:09

Misc= Spam

helltank · 2010-08-26 07:30:36

08jackt=Misc Hater=Random Things Hater=Internet Hater

... Internet is all about random things, which is what Misc is filled with. Anyway, lets not get into that semi-flamewar again.

Ace-of-Spades · 2010-08-26 08:08:16

I don't get the joke. Isn't this just attacking a New Scratcher? Is this the type of comics we'll be making in Scratch Comics? Then we're no better than the Troll Comics.

Ace-of-Spades · 2010-08-26 08:10:00

helltank wrote:
08jackt=Misc Hater=Random Things Hater=Internet Hater

... Internet is all about random things, which is what Misc is filled with. Anyway, lets not get into that semi-flamewar again.

Your argument is invalid, because the internet was not made for random things but for military purposes. And it is not a flamewar or a semi flamewar. Did you know that calling something randomly a flamewar is flamebaiting? You're prone to cause arguments.

Sunrise-Moon · 2010-08-26 10:40:59

Ace-of-Spades wrote:
I don't get the joke. Isn't this just attacking a New Scratcher? Is this the type of comics we'll be making in Scratch Comics? Then we're no better than the Troll Comics.

No, it's not meant to attack new scratchers, but haven't we all made a thread [or project] that we thought would become really popular, and then no one looks at it?

Ace-of-Spades · 2010-08-26 10:44:07

Sunrise-Moon wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
I don't get the joke. Isn't this just attacking a New Scratcher? Is this the type of comics we'll be making in Scratch Comics? Then we're no better than the Troll Comics.
No, it's not meant to attack new scratchers, but haven't we all made a thread [or project] that we thought would become really popular, and then no one looks at it?

Oh, so they're spam threads now?
And why is the first guy drawn so crudely compared to the second. Switching drawing styles throughout one comic is not very professional, unless of course you're trying to make that first person look less than the 2nd guy.

Sunrise-Moon · 2010-08-26 10:47:52

Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
I don't get the joke. Isn't this just attacking a New Scratcher? Is this the type of comics we'll be making in Scratch Comics? Then we're no better than the Troll Comics.
No, it's not meant to attack new scratchers, but haven't we all made a thread [or project] that we thought would become really popular, and then no one looks at it?
Oh, so they're spam threads now?
And why is the first guy drawn so crudely compared to the second. Switching drawing styles throughout one comic is not very professional, unless of course you're trying to make that first person look less than the 2nd guy.

Here, let's just get this straight- I'm not trying to be mean to anyone, and I don't want to offend anyone; I just thought it'd be a funny idea for a comic. The two people pictured are not supposed to look like anyone in particular, as I didn't make the comic targeting one person in particular.

Ace-of-Spades · 2010-08-26 11:05:19

Sunrise-Moon wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:

No, it's not meant to attack new scratchers, but haven't we all made a thread [or project] that we thought would become really popular, and then no one looks at it?
Oh, so they're spam threads now?
And why is the first guy drawn so crudely compared to the second. Switching drawing styles throughout one comic is not very professional, unless of course you're trying to make that first person look less than the 2nd guy.
Here, let's just get this straight- I'm not trying to be mean to anyone, and I don't want to offend anyone; I just thought it'd be a funny idea for a comic. The two people pictured are not supposed to look like anyone in particular, as I didn't make the comic targeting one person in particular.

You're targetting everyone then. The troll comics made many ones targetting nobody in particular as well. Making fun of everyone is as much not an option as making fun of one person in particular

militarydudes · 2010-08-26 11:10:34

Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Oh, so they're spam threads now?
And why is the first guy drawn so crudely compared to the second. Switching drawing styles throughout one comic is not very professional, unless of course you're trying to make that first person look less than the 2nd guy.
Here, let's just get this straight- I'm not trying to be mean to anyone, and I don't want to offend anyone; I just thought it'd be a funny idea for a comic. The two people pictured are not supposed to look like anyone in particular, as I didn't make the comic targeting one person in particular.
You're targetting everyone then. The troll comics made many ones targetting nobody in particular as well. Making fun of everyone is as much not an option as making fun of one person in particular

So, you find this offensive?

Sunrise-Moon · 2010-08-26 11:12:17

Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Oh, so they're spam threads now?
And why is the first guy drawn so crudely compared to the second. Switching drawing styles throughout one comic is not very professional, unless of course you're trying to make that first person look less than the 2nd guy.
Here, let's just get this straight- I'm not trying to be mean to anyone, and I don't want to offend anyone; I just thought it'd be a funny idea for a comic. The two people pictured are not supposed to look like anyone in particular, as I didn't make the comic targeting one person in particular.
You're targetting everyone then. The troll comics made many ones targetting nobody in particular as well. Making fun of everyone is as much not an option as making fun of one person in particular

I didn't mean to target anyone! Comics in the newspaper make fun of general human nature, etc.

Paddle2See · 2010-08-26 13:21:54

I think you make a good point with your comic. Every topic is created by somebody for some purpose. To the creator, the topic may be a source of pride. To others, the topic may be an annoying distraction. It all comes down to finding a way to deal with diverse expectations and interests - an area that we could certainly improve upon.

In this forum, the way it is now, there aren't a lot of ways to group things by interests...so we have to use our own internal filters in our brains to sift through the things that don't interest us and focus on things that do. This gets really hard to do if the amount of spam gets large or the posting fads start up again. It's important to realize that this is a shared space and people need to take other people's needs and desires into consideration.

Ace-of-Spades · 2010-08-26 15:46:30

militarydudes wrote:
Ace-of-Spades wrote:
Sunrise-Moon wrote:

Here, let's just get this straight- I'm not trying to be mean to anyone, and I don't want to offend anyone; I just thought it'd be a funny idea for a comic. The two people pictured are not supposed to look like anyone in particular, as I didn't make the comic targeting one person in particular.
You're targetting everyone then. The troll comics made many ones targetting nobody in particular as well. Making fun of everyone is as much not an option as making fun of one person in particular
So, you find this offensive?

What I find offensive is how he explained the comic. Everyone makes topics that they think will get lots of views, I'm sure, but is this what everyone else thinks? 'Oh great, another spam topic?' So he's saying that basically everyone thinks my (or your or their or his or her) topics are only spam.

Scratch

archived forums

#1 2010-08-25 22:30:46

What we think when we make a new thread.

#2 2010-08-25 22:31:26

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#3 2010-08-25 22:32:23

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

#4 2010-08-25 22:33:10

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#5 2010-08-25 22:33:34

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

rufflebee wrote:

#6 2010-08-25 22:33:50

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

rufflebee wrote:

#7 2010-08-25 22:35:15

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

DaGamez wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

#8 2010-08-25 22:35:31

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#9 2010-08-25 22:37:18

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

rufflebee wrote:

DaGamez wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

#10 2010-08-25 22:40:21

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

DaGamez wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

DaGamez wrote:

#11 2010-08-25 22:41:28

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

rufflebee wrote:

DaGamez wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

#12 2010-08-26 01:26:04

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

rufflebee wrote:

DaGamez wrote:

rufflebee wrote:

#13 2010-08-26 01:44:55

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#14 2010-08-26 05:50:09

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#15 2010-08-26 07:30:36

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#16 2010-08-26 08:08:16

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

#17 2010-08-26 08:10:00

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

helltank wrote:

#18 2010-08-26 10:40:59

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

#19 2010-08-26 10:44:07

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

#20 2010-08-26 10:47:52

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

#21 2010-08-26 11:05:19

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

#22 2010-08-26 11:10:34

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Sunrise-Moon wrote:

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

#23 2010-08-26 11:12:17

Re: What we think when we make a new thread.

Ace-of-Spades wrote:

Sunrise-Moon wrote: