Scratch

majormax, go to the top-secret dev site.

majormax wrote:

Sure
One week extra.

Thanks! 

Can I be a judge?

majormax wrote:

coolperson wrote:

Can I be a judge?

You are officially added!

Thank you!

Lellowsfuzz, go to the chat site on friday at 11:00. We're in the same timezone.
Sperry go to the chat room at 16:00.

I don't like school. I'll take you off the list. 

School starting should be on the list of natural disasters.

Too late, i think. 
be persistent thoughj!

majormax wrote:

Judges:
Subh
LS97
bendad
sparks
ScratchReallyROCKS
militarydudes
mXsoft11
Reese-O

Wow, Majormax, you chose some expert judges!

Starting a team soon......

No more spoilers.

Hmmm.....
Maybe there could be an extra points part where each judge give you up to 5 extra medal points. Any other suggestions? If a judge approves, I'll add that.

Last edited by majormax (2010-08-27 15:30:42)

i agree to whatever nXIII said. but not totally. see:

i say that it's true that we can't judge a mod just under certain aspects. let me give you an exmaple. Pick two imaginary mods, A and B.
A has mesh blocks and mesh enabled through the menu.
B desn't have mesh blocks, nor does it have mesh enabled automatically, but has a brand new way of projects communicating and has added list sharing through mesh too, as well as automatic attribute sharing, and can have up to 10 pcs connected together with different variable values.

with the judging method majormax put up, A would get more medal points than B, who worked way harder on it though.

so i propose to judge features with a scale, yes, but be flexible. don't judge them on features, but on a few key points:
- ease of use
- interface
- reliability
- speed
- blocks

and maybe have the creators put up their mod's features so no one misses them.
by the way, nXIII, why d'you change your icon? it was pretty good...

what do you think, collegues?

Last edited by LS97 (2010-08-28 05:06:12)

LS97 wrote:

i agree to whatever nXIII said. but not totally. see:

i say that it's true that we can't judge a mod just under certain aspects. let me give you an exmaple. Pick two imaginary mods, A and B.
A has mesh blocks and mesh enabled through the menu.
B desn't have mesh blocks, nor does it have mesh enabled automatically, but has a brand new way of projects communicating and has added list sharing through mesh too, as well as automatic attribute sharing, and can have up to 10 pcs connected together with different variable values.

with the judging method majormax put up, A would get more medal points than B, who worked way harder on it though.

so i propose to judge features with a scale, yes, but be flexible. don't judge them on features, but on a few key points:
- ease of use
- interface
- reliability
- speed
- blocks

and maybe have the creators put up their mod's features so no one misses them.
by the way, nXIII, why d'you change your icon? it was pretty good...

what do you think, collegues?

Maybe an other catergory too?

@Mitdyl11: Yeah you can judge!

ScratchReallyROCKS wrote:

Reeeeeeally good idea! I can't wait to see what people do! Of course, I have too many things to do, so I won't be entering. Do you think I might be able to be a judge?

HOW DO YOU DO THOSE IMAGES