^Title^
There's no reason for them not to, is there?
It would be helpful for making 1-sprite 1-script stamping glass doors or transparent water.
I mean, ghost is the only effect that doesn't get preserved in stamps.
Offline
I agree.
Maybe there is a problem like it would need too many layers or something, and the fact sprites cant be half ghost half not.
Offline
I agree
Offline
colorfusion wrote:
I agree.
Maybe there is a problem like it would need too many layers or something, and the fact sprites cant be half ghost half not.
Hmm? But stamps don't use layers... well idk.
Offline
iamrpk wrote:
I support this.
Thanks!
Offline
Support! Except it should have an option to turn it on and off
Offline
samurai768 wrote:
Support! Except it should have an option to turn it on and off
That'd be nice. But couldn't you just set ghost to zero to stamp? Unless you want to invisi-stamp, but as long as you don't put "stamp" at the end of a frame, you should be fine with that.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
I totally agree. All the other visual effects are kept while stamping, so why isn't ghosting? I see no reason why not to.
Me neither. But why would they have purposefully disabled one effect while allowing all the rest in the first place?
Offline
Harakou wrote:
Agreed! There's no reason not to, really.
No, there really isn't any reason not to, is there?
Offline