Can Admins demote Owners?
Offline
I'd be glad to join! *puts Starter pic in sig*
Offline
waveOSBeta wrote:
No.
What if two Admins vote unanimously on it and take over the Owner position jointly?
Offline
You would need every Admin to agree, and I disagree. Also, there can be more owners, but only Owners can promote users to Owners, or leave the position. So Aidan, if Wave decides to let you, you and him can be Owners together. But you need his permission.
Offline
DaGamez wrote:
You would need every Admin to agree, and I disagree. Also, there can be more owners, but only Owners can promote users to Owners, or leave the position. So Aidan, if Wave decides to let you, you and him can be Owners together. But you need his permission.
Ur not the Owner either. Who said you make the rules? ಠ_ಠ
Offline
I'll join you guys. Some say that this is the best way to win in war.
Infiltrate the enemy, like a trojan horse.
Offline
DECLINED.
Sorry, but you've been trying to ruin our goal, so you may not join.
Offline
Blade-Edge wrote:
Very well,. then I must resort to legal action.
FFFFFF-
That sounded... so nerdy.
;psst, your nerd is hanging out;
And besides... didn't you hint that you were going to destroy them...
Last edited by RobotKitty (2010-07-26 01:24:30)
Offline
RobotKitty wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
Very well,. then I must resort to legal action.
FFFFFF-
That sounded... so nerdy.
;psst, your nerd is hanging out;
And besides... didn't you hint that you were going to destroy them...
I'd love for you to have an actual lawsuit filed against you, then you went up to the prosecutor and insult him.
Offline
Blade-Edge wrote:
RobotKitty wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
Very well,. then I must resort to legal action.
FFFFFF-
That sounded... so nerdy.
;psst, your nerd is hanging out;
And besides... didn't you hint that you were going to destroy them...I'd love for you to have an actual lawsuit filed against you, then you went up to the prosecutor and insult him.
Uhm... problem is:
1. You'll most likely never get a lawsuit on me...
2. That would make no sense, because you're not a prosecutor... and I'm not really the defendant
Just dropped by here because I'm bored.
3. And I wouldn't insult them... for you are not a prosecutor...
4. Most my things make no sense, because nothing you said makes sense.
5. I see you Trollin'
6. Hatin'
Last edited by RobotKitty (2010-07-26 01:32:45)
Offline
RobotKitty wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
RobotKitty wrote:
FFFFFF-
That sounded... so nerdy.
;psst, your nerd is hanging out;
And besides... didn't you hint that you were going to destroy them...I'd love for you to have an actual lawsuit filed against you, then you went up to the prosecutor and insult him.
Uhm... problem is:
1. You'll most likely never get a lawsuit on me...
2. That would make no sense, because you're not a prosecutor... and I'm not really the defendantJust dropped by here because I'm bored.
3. And I wouldn't insult them... for you are not a prosecutor...
4. Most my things make no sense, because nothing you said makes sense.
5. I see you Trollin'
6. Hatin'
calm down. he's not serious... xD

Offline
08jackt wrote:
RobotKitty wrote:
Blade-Edge wrote:
I'd love for you to have an actual lawsuit filed against you, then you went up to the prosecutor and insult him.Uhm... problem is:
1. You'll most likely never get a lawsuit on me...
2. That would make no sense, because you're not a prosecutor... and I'm not really the defendantJust dropped by here because I'm bored.
3. And I wouldn't insult them... for you are not a prosecutor...
4. Most my things make no sense, because nothing you said makes sense.
5. I see you Trollin'
6. Hatin'calm down. he's not serious... xD
No, I was.
I just forgot because I don't care
Now, I'm gonna make a list
1. I didn't mean me, I meant anyone
2. I'm not a prosecutor. I'm a persecutor.
3. Once again, we're not talking about me here.
4. That might be because you don't understand it
5. Your
6. Mom
Offline
Fine, but you won't get any higher than a starter, and you won't be listed on the front page.
Offline
Then why should i join? Stop excluding me, just because you think I'm a bad person. I'm not. This is why someone reasonable like Jimmy should run the Forum Fighters; because he isn't biased. I'm joining his, not yours.
Offline
We're glad that you want to support Scratch, but we don't feel that this is a good way to go about it. Quoted from an earlier post about the Forum Fighters:
"Forum Fighters" is not really the kind of approach we support in dealing with trolls. In fact, by its very name, it tends to feed and encourage them. Trolls really love to find people who want to fight trolls - that's their favorite game. That's how you "feed the trolls."
A much better approach is to think about ways to de-escalate conflict. There will always be disagreement on the webs - and disagreement and conflict is actually fine, as long as it remains respectful. So if you want to help, find ways to help people chill out when they are getting angry or aggressive, and stick to reasoned arguments. It's not an easy problem - but it's one that will be more and more important as the internet gets older. And one that many grown ups have yet to be able to figure out.
Offline