Scratch

sanddude wrote:

wiimaster wrote:

How Commonsense.com rated TS3:

Ages 1-2 is Not Appropriate
Ages 3-4 is Iffy
Ages 5+ is Appropriate

For the age of FIVE:

Good:
Positive Messages: 3/5
Good Role Models: 3/5
Educational: 1/5

Bad:
Violence and Scariness: 3/5
Romance and Kissing: 1/5
Language: 1/5
Consumerism: 3/5
Drugs and Alcohol: 0/5

Main Scary Stuff:
Suspense Scenes (Dump Scene)
Scary Charecters (Specificly Big Baby and Monkey)
Mean Thoughts (What Lotso Does)

I know commonsense.com. It rated a Gorillaz album (that I have and many of my friends do at age 10) iffy for 14+. That cracked me up!    Common Sense needs to really, really get a life. I browse reviews, just to make fun of how stupid they are!           

Wow. You really don't understand that website. They are rating it for younger audiences perspective to let them know what is in it that would not be good for them! And plus, about the iffy 14+, that is what is ADVISED but obviously people like your friends do not listen to that. In the distorted, modern days, nobody follows the reviews, so technically that website is right and you and your friends are evidently wrong. It is not for your perspective, or any of the distorted parents who let their kids watch movies that are rated higher than them. It is for YOUNGER AUDIENCES.

Trust me, my parents are much more strict then you think they are. They are not "distorted".

soupoftomato wrote:

sanddude wrote:

wiimaster wrote:

How Commonsense.com rated TS3:

Ages 1-2 is Not Appropriate
Ages 3-4 is Iffy
Ages 5+ is Appropriate

For the age of FIVE:

Good:
Positive Messages: 3/5
Good Role Models: 3/5
Educational: 1/5

Bad:
Violence and Scariness: 3/5
Romance and Kissing: 1/5
Language: 1/5
Consumerism: 3/5
Drugs and Alcohol: 0/5

Main Scary Stuff:
Suspense Scenes (Dump Scene)
Scary Charecters (Specificly Big Baby and Monkey)
Mean Thoughts (What Lotso Does)

I know commonsense.com. It rated a Gorillaz album (that I have and many of my friends do at age 10) iffy for 14+. That cracked me up!    Common Sense needs to really, really get a life. I browse reviews, just to make fun of how stupid they are!           

Says the one who wanted less strict rules on scratch.

Because were only thinking of the 5 year old's on Scratch. Not the 15-year old's. The 15 year old is allowed to see and listen to stuff that swears like sailors. The 5 year old is not allowed to hear words like c**p. We are only thinking of the 5 year old's. We don't realize that they are both on Scratch. It would also be unfair if it were the opposite too. So we can't cater everything to what's appropriate for the 5 year old, because the 15 year old is on the site too. But we can't allow anything that's appropriate for the 15 year old, because the 5 year old exists too. So we should have it in the middle, and allow words like c**p.

Understand, my point? Or are you still too obsessed with everything being appropriate for everyone?

fire219 wrote:

coolstuff wrote:

cocoanut wrote:

What?! There's going to be a sequel to Up?

That's sickening. Up was incredible. They can't disgrace it. Up will only work once. Once.

They haven't announced a sequel for it yet. But we can hope 

What they HAVE announced a sequel for is Cars and Monsters, Inc. So expect those in 2011/2012.

It is taking them THIS LONG to make a Monsters, Inc. 2? The first one was years ago....
I can't wait for either of those!
@coconut Up is horrible. I agree they can't make a Up 2, but for a different reason.

Well, it took them 11 years to make a Toy Story 3!

PlayWithFire wrote:

MasterGamerZx3 wrote:

Epicest? Are you sure? I think Avatar has you beat there, my friend.

avatar wasn't that great, it was just visually stunning.  no amazing plots to be found.

graphics made with Vue 8.5x extreme I think lol
and that motion sensing stuff for some of the characters

nikkiperson2 wrote:

SPOILER ALERT
all the toys die at the end.
So does Andy.

LOL, that is so true 

Ludichris1 wrote:

I heard Disney got a new lead animator director or something who will having started with The Princess and the Frog, will BEGIN AGAIN (the old times) by making a 2D animated movie every 2 years (as best tehy can). W00t! I just hope they come with good music like the old ones did 
I mean the 3D ones are good too, but so are (most) of the 2D ones. They got classicness to them lol.

The current director of Pixar has no intention of making a 2D movie. Disney can do whatever they want, but for the record, I thought that The Princess and the Frog was horrible. It was as bad as any other princess movie.

sanddude wrote:

fire219 wrote:

coolstuff wrote:

They haven't announced a sequel for it yet. But we can hope 

What they HAVE announced a sequel for is Cars and Monsters, Inc. So expect those in 2011/2012.

It is taking them THIS LONG to make a Monsters, Inc. 2? The first one was years ago....
I can't wait for either of those!
@coconut Up is horrible. I agree they can't make a Up 2, but for a different reason.

Well, it took them 11 years to make a Toy Story 3!

Actually it would've only taken them 2. 

But it does take a super long time to make a good storyline.

Ludichris1 wrote:

I heard Disney got a new lead animator director or something who will having started with The Princess and the Frog, will BEGIN AGAIN (the old times) by making a 2D animated movie every 2 years (as best tehy can). W00t! I just hope they come with good music like the old ones did 
I mean the 3D ones are good too, but so are (most) of the 2D ones. They got classicness to them lol.

From your signature: I'm glad your not Ludacris, because I hate him! Be really disturbing if he was in Scratch.

sanddude wrote:

fire219 wrote:

coolstuff wrote:

They haven't announced a sequel for it yet. But we can hope 

What they HAVE announced a sequel for is Cars and Monsters, Inc. So expect those in 2011/2012.

It is taking them THIS LONG to make a Monsters, Inc. 2? The first one was years ago....
I can't wait for either of those!
@coconut Up is horrible. I agree they can't make a Up 2, but for a different reason.

Well, it took them 11 years to make a Toy Story 3!

It didn't actually take them 11 years... They just wanted the time line to be real! Did you know that we knew that there would be a TS3 since TS2 was out? If you watch in the "bloopers" of the credits, when Stinky Pete is talking to the Barbies in his box, he mentions TS3! Something about getting them a part in it... Maybe they are waiting to make the Incredibles 2 so that Vi, Dash, and Jack-Jakc are older....? one can hope 

"It didn't actually take them 11 years... They just wanted the time line to be real! Did you know that we knew that there would be a TS3 since TS2 was out? If you watch in the "bloopers" of the credits, when Stinky Pete is talking to the Barbies in his box, he mentions TS3! Something about getting them a part in it... Maybe they are waiting to make the Incredibles 2 so that Vi, Dash, and Jack-Jakc are older....? one can hope"


nope. Actually in 2003, it was supposed to m out, but in 2000, pixar called off the sequels.  2005, they worked more n the sequels. they made TS3 in 2010, they made C2 in 2011, MI2 in 2012. all they are making is sequels.

sanddude wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

sanddude wrote:

I know commonsense.com. It rated a Gorillaz album (that I have and many of my friends do at age 10) iffy for 14+. That cracked me up!    Common Sense needs to really, really get a life. I browse reviews, just to make fun of how stupid they are!           

Says the one who wanted less strict rules on scratch.

Because were only thinking of the 5 year old's on Scratch. Not the 15-year old's. The 15 year old is allowed to see and listen to stuff that swears like sailors. The 5 year old is not allowed to hear words like c**p. We are only thinking of the 5 year old's. We don't realize that they are both on Scratch. It would also be unfair if it were the opposite too. So we can't cater everything to what's appropriate for the 5 year old, because the 15 year old is on the site too. But we can't allow anything that's appropriate for the 15 year old, because the 5 year old exists too. So we should have it in the middle, and allow words like c**p.

Understand, my point? Or are you still too obsessed with everything being appropriate for everyone?

What the...? 'Too obsessed with everything being appropriate for everyone?' Are you saying it SHOULDN'T be appropriate for everyone? Yeah, it doesn't matter if a 15 year old sees bad stuff, of course, I would care if I saw that stuff, but its different for a five year old. If you are 5, you CANNOT see that stuff! THATS why we think of the 5 year olds! Lets make it simple for you to understnad:


If you are five, you can't hear bad words, and you practicly NEED to not hear that to grow up to a good person.
If you are fifteen, you can hear bad words, but you don't NEED to. Even if you want to hear bad words for some twisted reason, you don't have to.

Its not UNFAIR for 15 year olds to not hear swears. It IS unfair for five year olds to have to hear swears because the 15 year olds want to.

What, do you want us to 'think of the fifteen year olds' and 'be fair and let them swear'?

And no, none of us here get your point.




But, back on topic now.

Last edited by wiimaster (2010-07-24 09:05:40)

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

sanddude wrote:

fire219 wrote:

It is taking them THIS LONG to make a Monsters, Inc. 2? The first one was years ago....
I can't wait for either of those!
@coconut Up is horrible. I agree they can't make a Up 2, but for a different reason.

Well, it took them 11 years to make a Toy Story 3!

It didn't actually take them 11 years... They just wanted the time line to be real! Did you know that we knew that there would be a TS3 since TS2 was out? If you watch in the "bloopers" of the credits, when Stinky Pete is talking to the Barbies in his box, he mentions TS3! Something about getting them a part in it... Maybe they are waiting to make the Incredibles 2 so that Vi, Dash, and Jack-Jakc are older....? one can hope 

That is actually very true. They probably want to make stories according to several years.

In TS2, Prospector asks Woody if he thinks Andy's really gonna take him to college. FORESHADOWING...

Anyways, everyone PLEASE BE BACK ON TOPIC.

Last edited by banana500 (2010-07-24 11:45:55)