What Scratch 2.0 REALLY needs is a
[blocks]<wait until><when I receive[ ]>[blocks]
block!
It would make programming RPGs (like the one I'm working on right now) a lot easier! Please take this into consideration, Scratch Team!
Offline
This has been suggested a lot - but unfortunately the block won't be included because it's not boolean.
However, <I am recieving> and <I have recieved> are, so those can be put in
Offline
Maybe he means something like [wait until [] is broadcasted/received]. But you can use variables for that so it's not really necessary, adding it would just make stuff easier for newbies.
Offline
technoguyx wrote:
Maybe he means something like [wait until [] is broadcasted/received]Adding it would just make stuff easier for newbies.
Which could actually make it quite useful since a lot of new Scratchers don't know many work-arounds
A lot of the time ideas like this are suggested, "You can just do this or that instead" gets mentioned and it gets overlooked.
But I think blocks like this should still be included, since Scratch is supposed to be an easy to use program.
So... *Agrees* ^^
Last edited by 06dknibbs (2010-07-11 21:22:08)
Offline
hdarken wrote:
<if on touching sprite ( ), bounce>
Please try to keep the posts relevant to the thread - next time you want to make a suggestion, try making your own thread about it.
Offline
I am totally with you.
Offline
what about a block like this? :
Set volume of sound () to ()?
Offline
when I recieve <thing>
set variable to 1
set variable to 0
when flag clicked
wait until variable=1
Offline
likegames wrote:
when I recieve <thing>
set variable to 1
set variable to 0
when flag clicked
wait until variable=1
binary NOT trinary,
decoder i made (basic 4 bit,but i know them all)
0000=0 1000=8
0001=1 1001=9
<0010=2>1010=10
0011=3 1011=11
0100=4 1100-12
0101=5 1101=13
0110=6 1110=14
0111=7 1111=15
Offline