Scratch

I like all three Toy Story movies, but the third one was definitely better than the first two.

Yeah, I agree- it was great. Although, if you haven't seen it yet, I wouldn't bother spending the extra bucks for 3D because it really wasn't very 3D-y if you ask me...

Does anyone know if they're making an Incredibles 2? The ending completely set it up for a sequel. I also think they need to make a FInding Nemo 2, except maybe name it something else so poor Nemo doesn't have to get lost again.

Last edited by scmb1 (2010-07-06 22:40:05)

Tigerkidcub wrote:

scmb1 wrote:

Yeah, I agree- it was great. Although, if you haven't seen it yet, I wouldn't bother spending the extra bucks for 3D because it really wasn't very 3D-y if you ask me...

Does anyone know if they're making an Incredibles 2? The ending completely set it up for a sequel. I also think they need to make a FInding Nemo 2, except maybe name it something else so poor Nemo doesn't have to get lost again.

I agree... don't waste money on 3D. I think that Pixar doesn't make as many 3D-y movies as, say, the people who make the Harry Potter movies or Avatar.

Some movies were ment to have sequels and others were not. Here's a list a came up with for Pixar movies:

Key:    = good for sequels

          = bad for sequels

          = maybe, maybe not


Cars: 

Finding Nemo: 

The Incredibles: 

WALL-E:                       

Up: 

There actually is going to be a Cars sequel. It's next.

Monster's Inc. should totally have one.

Tigerkidcub wrote:

banana500 wrote:

Tigerkidcub wrote:

I thought that the villian was creepy. Not, scary exactly, but super creepy. He gave me the chills every time he spoke.

What do you mean by the line: "Pixar should really be independent at some point"?

By that he means that Disney shouldn't be taking control of awesome companies. Did you hear that they bought Marvel? That is just a disgrace.

Like I said earlier, Pixar is NOT a part of Disney anymore. It separated because Disney did not like Pixar's movie ideas (simply put, it gets more complicated). I agree, however, that the fact that Disney owns everything is a disgrace.

Actually no they didn't. Read the Wikipedia article on Pixar, no mention of it.

soupoftomato wrote:

Tigerkidcub wrote:

banana500 wrote:

By that he means that Disney shouldn't be taking control of awesome companies. Did you hear that they bought Marvel? That is just a disgrace.

Like I said earlier, Pixar is NOT a part of Disney anymore. It separated because Disney did not like Pixar's movie ideas (simply put, it gets more complicated). I agree, however, that the fact that Disney owns everything is a disgrace.

Actually no they didn't. Read the Wikipedia article on Pixar, no mention of it.

Just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Besides, everyone knows that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is often wrong.

soupoftomato wrote:

Tigerkidcub wrote:

soupoftomato wrote:

Actually no they didn't. Read the Wikipedia article on Pixar, no mention of it.

Just because they didn't mention it doesn't mean it didn't happen. Besides, everyone knows that Wikipedia is not a reliable source. It is often wrong.

http://tinyurl.com/33nuojm

Alright, even if the two companies didn't separate yet, I think that Pixar wants to.
I watched a movie reveiw online, and they said that Andrew Stanton (The director of many recent Pixar movies) had a few dream projects. Disney does not want to be a part of these "dream projects". That's a conflict that will lead to separation, if it hasn't happened already.

KalinaStar wrote:

...the worst movie I ever saw, with a bit of chessiness spinkled on top. Don't argue. I just thought so. But Buzz's Spanish parts were funny. 

Oh yeah, Buzz in Spanish! That WAS the funniest part of the movie. The rest of it, I thought, was either sadness or drama or boringness or action or something else not interesting.

"My overall opinion: It was okay. It was made for little kids, which broke the record of having two more "adult" films in a row, which were WALL-E and Up. I mean, honestly. Do you think that a little kid would understand the deep meanings of WALL-E? Don't you think that the beginning of Up was too depressing? That's how I felt. The problem with the Toy Story sequels is that there was two much time taken in between them. By the time that Toy Story 3 came out, everyone who saw the first two is all grown up. Like I said, the whole line of Toy Story's is really for little kids. I saw the first one when I was little, but now I'm older, and I'm not as interested anymore. The little kids who are watching the movie now have no idea about the past lives of the characters, so the movie is more confusing to them."

That's what a good friend of mine told me. I agree with her, except for one thing. I think that Toy Story 3 is a movie for ALL ages, not just little kids. I do agree that Pixar waited too long in between the three movies.

OMG!!! Totoro was in it! It was one of the little girl's toys!!!!! YAY FOR MIUZAKI!! (the last name of the guy who did Totoro)

KalinaStar wrote:

Tigerkidcub wrote:

KalinaStar wrote:

...the worst movie I ever saw, with a bit of chessiness spinkled on top. Don't argue. I just thought so. But Buzz's Spanish parts were funny. 

Oh yeah, Buzz in Spanish! That WAS the funniest part of the movie. The rest of it, I thought, was either sadness or drama or boringness or action or something else not interesting.

"My overall opinion: It was okay. It was made for little kids, which broke the record of having two more "adult" films in a row, which were WALL-E and Up. I mean, honestly. Do you think that a little kid would understand the deep meanings of WALL-E? Don't you think that the beginning of Up was too depressing? That's how I felt. The problem with the Toy Story sequels is that there was two much time taken in between them. By the time that Toy Story 3 came out, everyone who saw the first two is all grown up. Like I said, the whole line of Toy Story's is really for little kids. I saw the first one when I was little, but now I'm older, and I'm not as interested anymore. The little kids who are watching the movie now have no idea about the past lives of the characters, so the movie is more confusing to them."

That's what a good friend of mine told me. I agree with her, except for one thing. I think that Toy Story 3 is a movie for ALL ages, not just little kids. I do agree that Pixar waited too long in between the three movies.

Gah. OMG. You just read my mind. I thought Toy Story 3 was overly dramactic, but sort of a heartwarming story as well. I almost cried in the end. I don't like Bonnie...even if she takes good care of her toys. But I liked the Totoro and three peas in a pod toys. Adorable!

The peas in a pod aren't as adorable as the Little Green Men. Those guys SAVED THE TOYS LIVES.

oh and (spoiler alert!) I almost cired at the end! Best part is SPANISH BUZZ!!!!! I love the end creds when Buzz and Jessie dance "That's ok I know about Buzz'z Spanish mode" "My WHAT????" Did you know that Barbie was supposed to rescue them in the first movie but Mattel refused, only allowing her in the sequels?

GirWaffles64 wrote:

banana500 wrote:

Greenboi wrote:

I want to see it too, actually I was going to but we saw Shrek 3 because it was almost done being in the theatres, so my mom says.

You mean Shrek 4? That movie was terrible.

Most Dreamworks movies are pretty bad, and I think that they're a Pixar wannabe. Sure, Shrek 3 topped TS3 in box office grossing on opening weekend, but in my opinion, it was just bad. Dreamworks doesn't have an epic record for all movies not getting a single negative review, unlike Pixar.

Eh, Pixar is cool. But Bolt sucked.

Bolt WAS NOT (underline NOT) pixar! Pixar has 11 movies: Toy Story, Bug's Life, TS2, Nemo, Ratatiulie (spelling?), The Incredibles, Up, Wall-E, Monster's Inc., Cars, ans TS3. (and then a bunch of short films too). Bolt was Disney, but not pixar. (Sorry to post so much here. i'm a huge pixar fan)

lilacfuzz101 wrote:

GirWaffles64 wrote:

banana500 wrote:

You mean Shrek 4? That movie was terrible.

Most Dreamworks movies are pretty bad, and I think that they're a Pixar wannabe. Sure, Shrek 3 topped TS3 in box office grossing on opening weekend, but in my opinion, it was just bad. Dreamworks doesn't have an epic record for all movies not getting a single negative review, unlike Pixar.

Eh, Pixar is cool. But Bolt sucked.

Bolt WAS NOT (underline NOT) pixar! Pixar has 11 movies: Toy Story, Bug's Life, TS2, Nemo, Ratatiulie (spelling?), The Incredibles, Up, Wall-E, Monster's Inc., Cars, ans TS3. (and then a bunch of short films too). Bolt was Disney, but not pixar. (Sorry to post so much here. i'm a huge pixar fan)

My friend and I are HUGE Pixar fanatics, and we love every Pixar movie ever made. We think that Dreamworks is a Pixar wannabe and it is a pure FAIL. She also said that the reason that Shrek had so many sequels was because the first Shrek won an award for something, and Dreamworks has never won any award before. They keep making sequels so that they might get another award.
Keep dreaming, Dreamworks! You'll never reach the level of Pixar!

BTW, Bolt was made by Disney Animation Studios.

I saw it. It was nice, but a little too freaky for kids. But a good movie. To tell the truth, I got choked up a little at the end. 

Last edited by zawicki1fromyoutube (2010-07-10 22:13:45)