Topic closed
I use images for scripts; they look so much better. And I can use lists and other new blocks...
illusionist's idea is great, though; it's much easier.
Offline
Same!
Offline
Same!
But it might be hard to implement... :S
Offline
It would be easier to implement if they went with a more fancy forum system like MyBB (or even phpBB)
Offline
And 2.0 is quite a while away...
What can be done now, is to add the missing blocks, get rid of the obsolete blocks, and change Numbers to Operators! Please hurry up...
Offline
There is also a glitch where
<color[ ]is over[
The rest of the text is in bold.
Offline
[blocks]
henley wrote:
There is also a glitch where
<color[ ]is over[
The rest of the text is in bold.
[/blocks]xD It's not a glitch.
If you look under the text box, you'll see
Adding Scratch Blocks:
To add Scratch Blocks to your post, type [blocks ] before you start and [/blocks ] at the end of the blocks.
If you don't do that, it will make everything bold. xD
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
I usually type the blocks as text, though...
Me two! Example:
`_______________
|when |# clicked|
|forever___]
| ||if <key {space v} pressed?>]
| || |[change y by (5)]
| || |[wait (1) secs]
| || |[change y by (-5)]
| || |[say {I jumped!} for (2) secs]
| ||_________________________]
|__________]
Although I do think better forum blocks would be nice. Here's the same script made with the forum blocks instead:
[blocks]
<when green flag clicked>
<forever>
<if><key[ space ]pressed?>
<change y by( 5
<wait( 1 )secs>
<change y by( -5
<say[ I jumped! ]for( 2 )secs>
<end>
<end>
[/blocks]
Ugh.
Offline
Ooh, bumped!
...
MyRedNeptune wrote:
[blocks]
henley wrote:
There is also a glitch where
<color[ ]is over[
The rest of the text is in bold.[/blocks]xD It's not a glitch.
If you look under the text box, you'll seeAdding Scratch Blocks:
To add Scratch Blocks to your post, type [blocks ] before you start and [/blocks ] at the end of the blocks.If you don't do that, it will make everything bold. xD
(Almost) no one ever uses the BBCode for blocks.
Offline
jackrulez wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
I usually type the blocks as text, though...
Me two! Example:
`_______________
|when |# clicked|
|forever___]
| ||if <key {space v} pressed?>]
| || |[change y by (5)]
| || |[wait (1) secs]
| || |[change y by (-5)]
| || |[say {I jumped!} for (2) secs]
| ||_________________________]
|__________]
Although I do think better forum blocks would be nice. Here's the same script made with the forum blocks instead:
[blocks]
<when green flag clicked>
<forever>
<if><key[ space ]pressed?>
<change y by( 5
<wait( 1 )secs>
<change y by( -5
<say[ I jumped! ]for( 2 )secs>
<end>
<end>
[/blocks]
Ugh.
But I understood more quickly with the forum blocks...
Offline
Chrischb wrote:
jackrulez wrote:
Chrischb wrote:
I usually type the blocks as text, though...
Me two! Example:
`_______________
|when |# clicked|
|forever___]
| ||if <key {space v} pressed?>]
| || |[change y by (5)]
| || |[wait (1) secs]
| || |[change y by (-5)]
| || |[say {I jumped!} for (2) secs]
| ||_________________________]
|__________]
Although I do think better forum blocks would be nice. Here's the same script made with the forum blocks instead:
[blocks]
<when green flag clicked>
<forever>
<if><key[ space ]pressed?>
<change y by( 5
<wait( 1 )secs>
<change y by( -5
<say[ I jumped! ]for( 2 )secs>
<end>
<end>
[/blocks]
Ugh.
But I understood more quickly with the forum blocks...
Really? Here's a little translator:
[ ] = command block edges/text field
( ) = reporter block edges/number field
< > = predicate block edges/boolean inserter
{ v} = drop-down menu
| _______}
| |_______ = C-shaped block edges
| ________}
Offline
I think this is the easiest to understand:
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
I always just take pictures of my scripts... It makes your post look a heck of a lot better
Same here, but it also takes a lot longer. I never realized we were missing 34 blocks! That's a bunch!
Offline
If you want to build your own, you can try to take a picture of scripts when there are none. A little red box comes up (dismiss that) and all the stripes in the script area vanish! But it's a LOT easier to remove the background in Paint.
Offline
scratchisthebest wrote:
If you want to build your own, you can try to take a picture of scripts when there are none. A little red box comes up (dismiss that) and all the stripes in the script area vanish!
I just tried it, and it's SO AWESOME!!!
Offline
scratchisthebest wrote:
If you want to build your own, you can try to take a picture of scripts when there are none. A little red box comes up (dismiss that) and all the stripes in the script area vanish! But it's a LOT easier to remove the background in Paint.
Wow, awesome!
In GIMP, it's pretty easy though - but this makes it easier, thanks!
Offline
BUMP.
Another thing! Look at this: [script variables ((a)) < >] That's the textified script variables block from BYOB, but the double parentheses transform on their own, and make the rest of the text ugly and bold. I didn't even type the [blocks] and [/blocks][/blocks] tags!
Offline
jackrulez wrote:
BUMP.
Another thing! Look at this: [script variables ((a)) < >] That's the textified script variables block from BYOB, but the double parentheses transform on their own, and make the rest of the text ugly and bold. I didn't even type the [blocks] and [/blocks][/blocks] tags!
If you do type the blocks and /blocks tags the text won't get ugly and bold
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
jackrulez wrote:
BUMP.
Another thing! Look at this: [script variables ((a)) < >] That's the textified script variables block from BYOB, but the double parentheses transform on their own, and make the rest of the text ugly and bold. I didn't even type the [blocks] and [/blocks][/blocks] tags!If you do type the blocks and /blocks tags the text won't get ugly and bold
And if you select the "Never show smilies as icons for this post" thing, the forum blocks won't work - fixing your problem.
If you don't want to do that, put [b][/b] tags between the parentheses - that'll fix it.
...
On topic: I WANT THE FORUM BLOCKS UPDATED
Offline
When I ask andresmh, the most common response is that to update even the very few things, would take like an entire day's worth of work - so he doesn't have the time to do it. He recommends that if anybody knows PHP and wants to work on it, to do it with the Scratch Website source code and stuff, as it would be greatly appreciated
Offline
Lucario621 wrote:
When I ask andresmh, the most common response is that to update even the very few things, would take like an entire day's worth of work - so he doesn't have the time to do it. He recommends that if anybody knows PHP and wants to work on it, to do it with the Scratch Website source code and stuff, as it would be greatly appreciated
That sounds like nothing will ever get done...
When 2.0 is released, I hope the forum blocks will get updated - otherwise, we'll be stuck with the prehistoric 1.1 blocks. Dx
Offline
Topic closed