Pages: 1 2
Topic closed
Offline
webgal15 wrote:
I'm a stalker and proud :3 xD
QFT
So, what ya testin', Soup?
Offline
Wolfie1996 wrote:
webgal15 wrote:
I'm a stalker and proud :3 xD
QFT
So, what ya testin', Soup?
I will never reveal.
Offline
Testing whether or not you can leave off the "http://"?
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
Wolfie1996 wrote:
webgal15 wrote:
I'm a stalker and proud :3 xD
QFT
So, what ya testin', Soup?
I will never reveal.
Ah - testing the URL tags, I see ^^ Like how...
scratch.mit.edu
...won't become a link, but...
scratch.mit.edu
...will?
Good-good.
Offline
Wolfie1996 wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
Wolfie1996 wrote:
QFTSo, what ya testin', Soup?
I will never reveal.
Ah - testing the URL tags, I see ^^ Like how...
scratch.mit.edu
...won't become a link, but...
scratch.mit.edu
...will?
Good-good.![]()
Sort of. (I want to see what everyone says about this before I reveal.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
Code:
[url]scratch.mit.edu[/url] [url=scratch.mit.edu]Scratch Homepage[/url]
Testing if URL linking works outside of the code like images?
Offline
You all will never find out! MWAHAHAH!
Offline
I've got it! You're testing how many of us admit to being stalkers!
Offline
You know, if you put (Don't pay attention unless you are some type of stalker) will only attract more people to come to the thread.

Offline
MasterGamerZx3 wrote:
You know, if you put (Don't pay attention unless you are some type of stalker) will only attract more people to come to the thread.
![]()
Methinks that's the point...
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
This type of thread is starting to get annoying
![]()
I sort of like these threads. It's fun to see what titles users think might attract people--and if they work.
Last edited by webgal15 (2010-06-12 15:59:00)
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
This type of thread is starting to get annoying
![]()
That wasn't the reason.
I was testing to see if URLs were disabled cause I could have sworn I saw one that used to be a link and no longer was.
Offline
webgal15 wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
This type of thread is starting to get annoying
![]()
I sort of like these threads. It's fun to see what titles users think might attract people--and if they work.
![]()
Stick to a different forum, then. One that allows spamming.
I'm currently bored out of my mind, so I'll be here thinking up reasons as to why this and the others should be closed. Look forward to my reports.

Offline
I thought this was gonna be another one of those "see what type of title attracts ppl" threads
Offline
Paradox wrote:
Stick to a different forum, then.
Nah.
Last edited by webgal15 (2010-06-12 17:00:54)
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:

Offline
Paradox wrote:
webgal15 wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
This type of thread is starting to get annoying
![]()
I sort of like these threads. It's fun to see what titles users think might attract people--and if they work.
![]()
Stick to a different forum, then. One that allows spamming.
I'm currently bored out of my mind, so I'll be here thinking up reasons as to why this and the others should be closed. Look forward to my reports.
This isn't one of those threads.
You people need to work on how much stuff you assume.
Last edited by soupoftomato (2010-06-12 18:44:34)
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
Paradox wrote:
webgal15 wrote:
I sort of like these threads. It's fun to see what titles users think might attract people--and if they work.![]()
Stick to a different forum, then. One that allows spamming.
I'm currently bored out of my mind, so I'll be here thinking up reasons as to why this and the others should be closed. Look forward to my reports.This isn't one of those threads.
![]()
You people need to work on how much stuff you assume.
Take a chill pill, man

Offline
rufflebee wrote:
Hehe I'm not a stalker, I just stalk as a hobby.
So in other words you are a stalker. Most people exercise hobbies regularly.
Offline
Topic closed
Pages: 1 2