Scratch

Bobby500 wrote:

maki wrote:

Scratch Agents have fixed the flagging system, it's better now.

There is no agency!!!!!! It is just a bunch of members that are trying to do the right thing but are completely lost as how to do it!
You don't get special status for it, the admins haven't approved of it so it does not exist!

Last time I checked, Scratch Agents does exist!
We do have a gallery, you know. 
And, 'A bunch of members'?
Scratch Agents has over 80 members.
I don't really think that's a bunch.

And for everyone's information, DaRossi and I are meeting with each other to clear this whole mess all up.
We'll tell you when we're done meeting, and what we've decided.

ekekcole wrote:

Bobby500 wrote:

maki wrote:

Scratch Agents have fixed the flagging system, it's better now.

There is no agency!!!!!! It is just a bunch of members that are trying to do the right thing but are completely lost as how to do it!
You don't get special status for it, the admins haven't approved of it so it does not exist!

Last time I checked, Scratch Agents does exist!
We do have a gallery, you know. 
And, 'A bunch of members'?
Scratch Agents has over 80 members.
I don't really think that's a bunch.

And for everyone's information, DaRossi and I are meeting with each other to clear this whole mess all up.
We'll tell you when we're done meeting, and what we've decided.

well juust to tell ya I dont care what u guys decide on. But when DaRossi decides to attack again u guys dont come crying cus o told ya so. Well to tell ya im done with scratch so bye all.

Bobby500 wrote:

No! People this thing was started by Toasty to be against cyber-bullying. The real "protectors" of scratch's innocent eyes are people like Myreneptune and kevin karplus! This is a bunch of members with good intentions but horrible execution.

I did not start it. I just have a partition to 'Stop Cyber Bullying' and that's fair lots of people have signed it, people who care about 'protecting' Scratch. Lanie started the Agents and up until she left it was good there was no one complaining and everyone was happy that they were doing the right thing.

ekekcole wrote:

Bobby500 wrote:

maki wrote:

Scratch Agents have fixed the flagging system, it's better now.

There is no agency!!!!!! It is just a bunch of members that are trying to do the right thing but are completely lost as how to do it!
You don't get special status for it, the admins haven't approved of it so it does not exist!

Last time I checked, Scratch Agents does exist!
We do have a gallery, you know. 
And, 'A bunch of members'?
Scratch Agents has over 80 members.
I don't really think that's a bunch.

And for everyone's information, DaRossi and I are meeting with each other to clear this whole mess all up.
We'll tell you when we're done meeting, and what we've decided.

We're done meeting!
We've made a truce.
You can read the results of the meeting here: http://scratch.mit.edu/galleries/view/20282

terminator68 wrote:

maki wrote:

well, darossi and i have decided to make a non-corrupt scratch agents, especially after what ekekcole did.

What did ekekcole do?

I'm not sure, actually.
LOL

DAROSSI IS A TRADER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HE USED TO BE IN THE SCRATCH AGENTS, AND NOW HE IS ACUSING THEM OF UNTRUE STUFF!!!
<when green flag clicked>
<set{ DaRossi }to( 0

geckofreak wrote:

Amdresh should really just ban all the scratch agents

Now, now, now...
Isn't that a bit harsh?
We're only trying to help Scratch.
Seriously.
Scratch Agents: <set{ Scratch }to(100)

ekekcole wrote:

geckofreak wrote:

Amdresh should really just ban all the scratch agents

Now, now, now...
Isn't that a bit harsh?
We're only trying to help Scratch.
Seriously.
Scratch Agents: <set{ Scratch }to(100)

And besides, if he Andremesh did that he would be banning over 60 Scratchers.

<set{ Scratch }to( 100)

Just remember a few things:

1. When flagging a project do not flag it simply because someone asks you to, instead think about whether or not it follows the Terms of Use.

2. Just because a project gets flagged doesn't mean that it will be removed. A project that gets too many flags can be automatically censored but the Scratch Team will review the case and decide independently.

Be aware that the Scratch Team might block accounts of people who flag projects that do not deserve to flagged.

As MyRedNeptune said, please keep the discussion positive and constructive.

andresmh wrote:

Just remember a few things:

1. When flagging a project do not flag it simply because someone asks you to, instead think about whether or not it follows the Terms of Use.

2. Just because a project gets flagged doesn't mean that it will be removed. A project that gets too many flags can be automatically censored but the Scratch Team will review the case and decide independently.

Be aware that the Scratch Team might block accounts of people who flag projects that do not deserve to flagged.

As MyRedNeptune said, please keep the discussion positive and constructive.

Alright.

Bobby500 wrote:

Hey sorry for all of the Upheaval that I caused, I just reread my posts and I was as UGLY as a troll back there. I was hyped up on caffiene and sugar and got out of control. Sorry, this apology is to anyone that I hurt while on my rage. Anyway, goodluck scratching!

Thanks for apologizing 

im part of it but i dont want 2 get flamed 4 it btw i dont flag a project if it only has blood in it

Bobby500 wrote:

cocoanut wrote:

Deciding if a project is really inappropriate is up to an individual person.  Although the Scratch Agents' intentions are to make Scratch a better and safer site, bombarding a project with flags that may not even have much violence in it certainly does NOT help.

Um, this topic was kind of dead.

Can a mod lock this thread so another fight doesn't continue because otherwise someone will keep bringing it back up.

I realize that, I forgot to read the third page of this thread.