Greenboi wrote:
Someone deleted my posts
![]()
Wolfie1996 wrote:
OK... I removed some posts discussing specific bans - please don't discuss individual bans on here. It's a little bit close to breaking the "be respectful" part of the terms of use. Thanks
![]()
^
Offline
Greenboi wrote:
Someone deleted my posts
![]()
I clucked my tongue. How could they remove Greenboi's post? It was disgraceful! It was an atrocious! Alas, Moderators always gave a cruel fate.
JK XD. I love story-telling.
Offline
Greenboi wrote:
Someone deleted my posts
![]()
Ah - sorry about that! They quoted some talk about specific bans... which, due to respect issues, I felt the need to remove.
Offline
Wolfie1996 wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Wolfie1996 wrote:
OK... I removed some posts discussing specific bans - please don't discuss individual bans on here. It's a little bit close to breaking the "be respectful" part of the terms of use. Thanks
![]()
You are totally right.
But I don't think spammers really deserve respect.![]()
Cheddargirl mentioned something about it once - we have to respect everyone: spammers and trolls included.
![]()
Whaaat?
To me its like being nice to the Devil.
Offline
juststickman wrote:
Repost
![]()
[img]http://img696.imageshack.us/img696/9470 … order2.png[/img]
Have you removed using the img tag for new posts?
Offline
juststickman wrote:
juststickman wrote:
Have you removed using the img tag for new posts?
No, see:
Somethings wrong with your image's URL
Offline
juststickman wrote:
juststickman wrote:
Have you removed using the img tag for new posts?
I didn't think that had happened yet...
There's a space in your URL
Offline

Oh, lol. Anyway, repost!
Offline
I did happen to see a thread admitting someone was two people, and lets just say they did....bad things. (Not going to admit ANYTHING private.) I wish it would be spam-free, this website...
Maybe they'll upgrade Scratch or something to make it so nobody can spam at all. Like, whoever spams, (Not mentioning names) could be automatically reported, so people wouldn't have to (1) Look at it and then report it(What if nobody thinks its spam?) and (2) So no spammers think it's OK to spam here. Still, this website is pretty spam-protected. What I meant there was if new, young Scratchers didn't know what spam was. This website is really great because everyone knows about spam and how bad it is.
Offline
keikij wrote:
I think they were the same person, personally.
me too! cuz 1 posted inappriate pics, then the other swore at all the "little bleeps that miss pics!
Offline
Musicstar888 wrote:
I did happen to see a thread admitting someone was two people, and lets just say they did....bad things. (Not going to admit ANYTHING private.) I wish it would be spam-free, this website...
Maybe they'll upgrade Scratch or something to make it so nobody can spam at all. Like, whoever spams, (Not mentioning names) could be automatically reported, so people wouldn't have to (1) Look at it and then report it(What if nobody thinks its spam?) and (2) So no spammers think it's OK to spam here. Still, this website is pretty spam-protected. What I meant there was if new, young Scratchers didn't know what spam was. This website is really great because everyone knows about spam and how bad it is.
![]()
You can't auto-report spam because you can't always tell what is spam with a filter.
Example: a mystery story site got blocked for gaming at school because the url had the word "flash", and it was used in class.
Offline
I'm pretty sure I was one of the first to notice. Too bad they made us lose images though.
Offline
illusionist wrote:
Cnor wrote:
It's happened again
![]()
Got it!
Maybe you should alert the community not to post retorts to the troll, and not to complain publicly about the images? He like's when the members on Miscellaneous do.
Offline