I am making a project called "DRIVE" which is a shooter- My problem is that my sprites all can move up and down and have a possibility of overlapping- currently i have no way of layering my sprites and the overlap of a sprite that is higher than another sprite could ruin the 3d illusion
PLEASE HELP
Offline
Yes, as Coolstuff said, the looks blocks (at the very bottom of the list) can be used to control layering.
In the picture above, I have added variables to monitor the layer of a sprite.
I hope this helps!
Offline
illusionist wrote:
Yes, as Coolstuff said, the looks blocks (at the very bottom of the list) can be used to control layering.
http://i43.tinypic.com/4gjhwo.png
In the picture above, I have added variables to monitor the layer of a sprite.
I hope this helps!![]()
I know about those- but I'm trying to combine them with "forever if", so I cannot fathom a way to keep the layers in check without resseting the layers every time- which would look bad.
Offline
HollowAizen wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Yes, as Coolstuff said, the looks blocks (at the very bottom of the list) can be used to control layering.
http://i43.tinypic.com/4gjhwo.png
In the picture above, I have added variables to monitor the layer of a sprite.
I hope this helps!![]()
I know about those- but I'm trying to combine them with "forever if", so I cannot fathom a way to keep the layers in check without resseting the layers every time- which would look bad.
You mean something like a "go to layer x?"
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
HollowAizen wrote:
illusionist wrote:
Yes, as Coolstuff said, the looks blocks (at the very bottom of the list) can be used to control layering.
http://i43.tinypic.com/4gjhwo.png
In the picture above, I have added variables to monitor the layer of a sprite.
I hope this helps!![]()
I know about those- but I'm trying to combine them with "forever if", so I cannot fathom a way to keep the layers in check without resseting the layers every time- which would look bad.
You mean something like a "go to layer x?"
Yeah
Offline
HollowAizen wrote:
coolstuff wrote:
HollowAizen wrote:
I know about those- but I'm trying to combine them with "forever if", so I cannot fathom a way to keep the layers in check without resseting the layers every time- which would look bad.You mean something like a "go to layer x?"
Yeah
You can always "go to front" and then "go back x layers."
It could get a *little* choppy, but it's the best you can do.
Offline