Scratch

51 MB? 51 MB ZIP FILE? what did you do, expand the files when you put them away in the zip file? All you need is the image! gawsh!

markyparky56 wrote:

http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/4721/c … osedly.png
Really? You actualy got it copyrighted?

Plus:

Billybob-Mario wrote:

nXIII wrote:

Let's be honest, over half of them are not really yours to share, are they?

I do not give full responses to Panther people.

I don't know wherther to be offended or mad at that comment. Technicaly that was a full response, a non-full response would be.

I dont give Full resp-

You just didn't answer his question, which he had the right to ask. So please, answer nXIII's question.

I didn't get it copyrighted, another Slash team member put that there.

Also, I can share what I want, with any non-Panther people.

markyparky56 wrote:

Billybob-Mario wrote:

markyparky56 wrote:

http://img42.imageshack.us/img42/4721/c … osedly.png
Really? You actualy got it copyrighted?

Plus:

Billybob-Mario wrote:

I do not give full responses to Panther people.

I don't know wherther to be offended or mad at that comment. Technicaly that was a full response, a non-full response would be.

You just didn't answer his question, which he had the right to ask. So please, answer nXIII's question.

I didn't get it copyrighted, another Slash team member put that there.

Also, I can share what I want, with any non-Panther people.

Well i suggest remove it, because its a lie. Plus that last line relates to nothing I said.

Perhaps an H was in order there?

Billybob-Mario wrote:

Also, I can share what I want, with any non-Panther people.

A bit discriminative, don't you think? what made you think we'd steal your ideas? we wouldn't do that because we're above that.

Well, nXIII seems to know quite a bit about scratch + squeak in general.

but, since you get what you pay for(Treat someone else like a jerk, why do they have reason to treat you fairly?), why would he help you?

Cool it guys, I think thats enough calling people jerks and everything.

nXIII wrote:

Billybob-Mario wrote:

cds56 wrote:

Well, nXIII seems to know quite a bit about scratch + squeak in general.

but, since you get what you pay for(Treat someone else like a jerk, why do they have reason to treat you fairly?), why would he help you?

I don't want him to help me.

Well you want to hand out my hard work without giving credit, so why not top it off by asking my assistance?

isn't it fun to watch nXIII duke it out with other mod creators?

hm... I don't like this confrontation between mods, I wish people would stop. I have to admit there are just too many being created at the moment, and alot of them only have blocks that have been drawn from the obsolete block specs.

markyparky56 wrote:

sparks wrote:

hm... I don't like this confrontation between mods, I wish people would stop. I have to admit there are just too many being created at the moment, and alot of them only have blocks that have been drawn from the obsolete block specs.

Do any of those ones actualy work? Them being Obselete and all.

yeah, a lot of them actually do.  but most were deleted for a reason.

examples:

stretch effect - actually useful, and not replicable as far as I know.  don't know why they got rid of it...

say/think nothing - functions fine, but can be easily replicated.

glide to x: y: for () seconds - works, but is virtually a clone of the other block.

^ just sets the song back to the start. can be achieved with a stop all sounds and play sound block together

markyparky56 wrote:

sparks wrote:

^ just sets the song back to the start. can be achieved with a stop all sounds and play sound block together

Oh, i thought it ment it rewound the song, lol.

nope.  there is no practical purpose for it.

AmoebaMan wrote:

alright, here's the official list of Slash's new blocks/features categories:

.:TOTALLY USELESS:.

[glide x:(num) y:(num) in (num) secs]
[clone invisible]
[rewind sound [snd]]
[show IP address]
[turn fill screen off]
[turn fill screen on]
[save hacks and quit Slash]
(last recieved)
([str] of [str])
<<bol> = <bol>>
(abs (num))
(sqrt (num))
<is using Slash?>
[export me]
[import project]
[new project]
[open project]
[save project]
[quit Slash]
[point away from edge]
[change costume by (num)]
[change background by (num)]
[say nothing]
extra [make a list]
[press green flag]

.:DON'T WORK:.

[import image and wait]
[change visibility by (num)]
[set visibility to (num)]
[enter presentation mode]
[exit presentation mode]
(I should mention also that Slash's presentation mode doesn't work anyways)
(contents of file [str])
[write [str] to file [str]]
[clear file [str]]
[when <bol> is true] (hat block)
[(num) is within (num) of (num)]
(hexidecimal (num))

.:GOOD BLOCKS:.

[clone this sprite] - stolen
[delete this sprite] - stolen
[clone with name [str]]
[point to x: (num) y: (num)] - stolen
[take photo] - stolen
[paint costume] - stolen
[save stage area to sprite] - stolen
[import image and wait] - stolen
[change stretch by (num)]
[set stretch to (num)]
[go to webpage URL [str]] - stolen
[host mesh] - stolen
[join mesh] - stolen
[show dialog [str] which says [str]] - stolen
(key pressed) - stolen
[rename me [str]] - stolen
(name) - stolen
((num) ^ (num))
(pi)
(e)
[[str] backwards]
[[str] scrambled]
(round (num) to nearest (num))
[make a variable] - stolen
[make a list] - stolen
[show list [lst]] - stolen
[hide list [lst]] - stolen
<[str] mouse down?> - stolen
(date/time: [d/t]) - stolen
[paint sprite] - stolen

NOTE: Only blocks in the GOOD BLOCKS category have been marked as stolen, and only ones whose code I have seen from other people.  If an unmarked block was stolen, please tell me.

I think I mentioned the 'clone with name' one on some thread....