Jens wrote:
Re: <I receive>
sparks wrote:
I think one problem for the <recieve> block is that the broadcast only lasts a short time.
Hey guys, you know, you could (or, if I followed this thread correctly, you already maybe have) implement a "last received" reporter that remembers the last message received by any object. Then you could continuously check if the <last received> message has changed - and there you have it.
Another hint: There's a pretty cool abandoned "WhenHatBlockMorph" in the code that basically allows you to create your own hat blocks by just inserting a boolean. If you just tweak the code a little it works like a charm, plus it's really cool. Then, of course, you could use this in combination with the <last received> block.... (!)
I'm sending you an email about this... I don't like public forums.
Offline
@NXIII: No offense, but you're as proprietary as Microsoft.
Offline
waveOSBeta wrote:
@NXIII: No offense, but you're as proprietary as Microsoft.
Most of the time he has a good reason to be though.
Offline
nXIII wrote:
Well, they're a very successful company....
Yeah, but everyone hates them. You don't want that, do you?
Jens, if the generic hat block is so easy, let's do it in BYOB! I like blocks that accomplish a lot of expressive power with very little mechanism. [Which isn't to say you shouldn't also do it in Panther; everyone should do it!]
Offline
bharvey wrote:
nXIII wrote:
Well, they're a very successful company....
Yeah, but everyone hates them. You don't want that, do you?
Jens, if the generic hat block is so easy, let's do it in BYOB! I like blocks that accomplish a lot of expressive power with very little mechanism.[Which isn't to say you shouldn't also do it in Panther; everyone should do it!]
Grrrr... Whats hateable about them?!
Offline
nXIII wrote:
waveOSBeta wrote:
@NXIII: No offense, but you're as proprietary as Microsoft.
Well, they're a very successful company....
LINUX ROCKS!
Offline
waveOSBeta wrote:
nXIII wrote:
waveOSBeta wrote:
@NXIII: No offense, but you're as proprietary as Microsoft.
Well, they're a very successful company....
LINUX ROCKS!
Poor misguided child... (no offence) But whats Rockable about Linux? To me the only good thing is the penguin...
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
waveOSBeta wrote:
nXIII wrote:
Well, they're a very successful company....LINUX ROCKS!
Poor misguided child... (no offence) But whats Rockable about Linux? To me the only good thing is the penguin...
It's free, open source, fast, it works good on 64-bit, you can mod it, you can change the taskbar to look like a mac's, ...
The list could go on forever.
Offline
waveOSBeta wrote:
markyparky56 wrote:
waveOSBeta wrote:
LINUX ROCKS!Poor misguided child... (no offence) But whats Rockable about Linux? To me the only good thing is the penguin...
It's free, open source, fast, it works good on 64-bit, you can mod it, you can change the taskbar to look like a mac's, ...
The list could go on forever.
Yeah... ok, a modders playground, and if you actualy want a reliable Operating System? Then what do you do? Plus, why would you want the task bar to look like a Macs?
Offline
10.04 is the most stable OS I've ever seen. Windows crashes every 10 seconds.
Also, the mac taskbar/dock looks cool.
Offline
waveOSBeta wrote:
10.04 is the most stable OS I've ever seen. Windows crashes every 10 seconds.
Also, the mac taskbar/dock looks cool.
Windows doesn't crash every ten seconds, im still answering you aren't I? Did you perhaps have an illegal version of windows? And I dont think the mac taskbar doesn't look nice, its borring...
Offline
No, I validated it as genuine.
Also, People have different opinions.
Offline
Off Topic! Start A New Thread If You Must Squabble Over Such Trivialties
EDIT: huh? it changed the text to gamemaster font.... er, well, it was in all caps, so know I was shouting.
Last edited by sparks (2010-05-11 16:23:53)
Offline
markyparky56 wrote:
Grrrr... Whats hateable about them?!
Sigh, I apologize if you're a stockholder/employee/child of employee. But...
1. Bill Gates gets a contract from IBM to supply an operating system for the PC on the strength of falsely claiming to have one written.
2. He then turns around and buys DOS from some actual programmer for a pittance.
3. He signs a contract promising that IBM will have exclusive rights to market PC-DOS, then screws them by making some infinitesimal change and selling the new version as MS-DOS.
4. Microsoft then illegally uses its monopoly in operating systems to establish monopolies in other software categories, most notably browsers, by requiring manufacturers to bundle MS software with the machines and by taking advantage of secret OS features that competing software can't use. They also tell PC manufacturers that MS will not give them OEM quantity discounts on Windows if they also sell machines that run other OSes.
On reliability, to be fair, it's gotten better since NT. It's still the most virus-prone by far, but (to be fair again) that's more because virus writers target the monopoly OS than because the others are better software.
But, along the way, MS basically maintains its position in the OS market by reimplementing other people's ideas, most notably Xerox/Apple's ideas. People who are uptight about other people stealing ideas from Panther ought not to be MS fans, I should think.
Sorry for the long mostly-off-topic message, but you did ask.
Offline
I have used both windows and mac. I love the graphics of mac, as well as the sound editing program "logic" which windows simply does not have but I use a PC for the main reason that it's so much cheaper to by.
Offline
sparks wrote:
I have used both windows and mac...
Somehow (I don't think you started it, sparks) this has devolved into the usual discussion of which OS is best (to which the answer, alas, is ITS). But that wasn't the original topic, which was why people hate Microsoft, the company, not Windows the OS, and whether nXIII, on reflection, really wants to hold them up as a standard of behavior! Much more interesting.
Offline
bharvey wrote:
sparks wrote:
I have used both windows and mac...
Somehow (I don't think you started it, sparks) this has devolved into the usual discussion of which OS is best (to which the answer, alas, is ITS). But that wasn't the original topic, which was why people hate Microsoft, the company, not Windows the OS, and whether nXIII, on reflection, really wants to hold them up as a standard of behavior! Much more interesting.
![]()
I said "successful", not "awesome", "ethical", "moral", or anything else of the sort....
Offline
nXIII wrote:
I said "successful", not "awesome", "ethical", "moral", or anything else of the sort....
Yeah, but you said it in response to an accusation of being like them! You could have said "No I'm not!"
(You don't mind being teased among friends, do you?)
Offline
bharvey wrote:
nXIII wrote:
I said "successful", not "awesome", "ethical", "moral", or anything else of the sort....
Yeah, but you said it in response to an accusation of being like them! You could have said "No I'm not!"
![]()
(You don't mind being teased among friends, do you?)
Of course not!
Offline
Hehe, this is such a quirky thread
I can't wait for the Panther (beta) mod to come out.
If only I could've been on the dev team... Panther seems like one of the only mods worth following.
P.S: There are two block settings now?(low graphics and high graphics?)
...Is nXIII a MACCIE?
Offline
cds56 wrote:
Hehe, this is such a quirky thread
![]()
I can't wait for the Panther (beta) mod to come out.
If only I could've been on the dev team... Panther seems like one of the only mods worth following.
P.S: There are two block settings now?(low graphics and high graphics?)
...Is nXIII a MACCIE?
No, three settings: fast, normal (Scratch-style), and good (awesome-style).
What's a MACCIE?
bharvey wrote:
nXIII wrote:
I said "successful", not "awesome", "ethical", "moral", or anything else of the sort....
Yeah, but you said it in response to an accusation of being like them! You could have said "No I'm not!"
![]()
(You don't mind being teased among friends, do you?)
And now comes the point where I realize that I just said I was neither moral, awesome, nor anything else of the sort....
Last edited by nXIII (2010-05-11 21:23:25)
Offline
nXIII wrote:
And now comes the point where I realize that I just said I was neither moral, awesome, nor anything else of the sort....
![]()
Hey, but at least you're successful!
PS I have my desktop browser set to white-on-black, and just now I was for the first time reading the forums from my phone, on which I haven't so far figured out how to set it that way, so I just for the first time saw that little falling comma or whatever it is, in your logo, which isn't visible in black on black. If I stare at it long enough, is it going to mean something?
Offline