Evidence and Resources: (gathered by soupoftomato)
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=35233
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=27788
http://scratch.mit.edu/users/Santa_Claus
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=35055
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?pid=385297#p385297
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=27765
http://stats.scratch.mit.edu/personal/monthlyactivity.html?user=BWOG
http://stats.scratch.mit.edu/personal/monthlyactivity.html?user=littletonkslover
http://stats.scratch.mit.edu/personal/monthlyactivity.html?user=floatingmagictree
I will add more if more is found.
Offline
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=35217
http://scratch.mit.edu/forums/viewtopic.php?id=34284
The first one has the current last posts of Tonks and FMT.
BWOG's post in the last.
Offline
ALERT ALERT LTL IS ONLINE
hi
I'm gonna get 60 seconds, so saving time ahead of time.
blehblehblehblehblehbleh
Offline
illusionist wrote:
shamrocker wrote:
Hm. By the way, Illusionist's badge for the lead of investigastion. http://i44.tinypic.com/2reqo92.jpg
lol
![]()
Thanks!
WE STILL NEED TONKS TO POST!
There. Happy now?
Geez........ ¬¬

Offline
You iz innocent!
I think we have our criminal...
BWOG!
Offline
Yeah, its gotten pretty obvious by now it's BWOG.
Offline
It'd be pretty funny though if he just showed up and said it wasn't him.
Offline
Kileymeister wrote:
It'd be pretty funny though if he just showed up and said it wasn't him.
That would be awesome if he did. xD
Offline
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
shamrocker wrote:
Hm. By the way, Illusionist's badge for the lead of investigastion. http://i44.tinypic.com/2reqo92.jpg
lol
![]()
Thanks!
WE STILL NEED TONKS TO POST!There. Happy now?
Geez........ ¬¬
SOOOOORY for interrupting your ever-so-important... nevermind.
I'm just glad you are not leaving.

Offline
illusionist wrote:
AS CHIEF INVESTIGATOR OF THIS MYSTERY, I OFFICIALLY DECLARE:
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnfdjk.png
I'll miss the little guy.......

Offline
littletonkslover wrote:
illusionist wrote:
AS CHIEF INVESTIGATOR OF THIS MYSTERY, I OFFICIALLY DECLARE:
http://i40.tinypic.com/vnfdjk.pngI'll miss the little guy.......
I will too.
Offline
cocoanut wrote:
BWOG WAS BANNED.
What? .....Then maybe this son of a biscuit Santa was just lying......

Offline
littletonkslover wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
BWOG WAS BANNED.
What? .....Then maybe this son of a biscuit Santa was just lying......
BWOG GOT UN-BANNED YESTERDAY
he posted, disappeared, and then we have Santa.
Offline
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
BWOG WAS BANNED.
What? .....Then maybe this son of a biscuit Santa was just lying......
BWOG GOT UN-BANNED YESTERDAY
he posted, disappeared, and then we have Santa.
Like a two-day ban? Whaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Edit: Okay, it was two days.
BWOG, yesterday wrote:
I think a day long ban was long enough for me
If one day's long enough for him, why would he leave?
Last edited by cocoanut (2010-05-06 21:48:48)
Please leave a message at the beep.Offline
cocoanut wrote:
illusionist wrote:
littletonkslover wrote:
What? .....Then maybe this son of a biscuit Santa was just lying......BWOG GOT UN-BANNED YESTERDAY
he posted, disappeared, and then we have Santa.Like a two-day ban? Whaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Edit: Okay, it was two days.BWOG, yesterday wrote:
I think a day long ban was long enough for me
If one day's long enough for him, why would he leave?
He only left the forums. He was originally only banned because of the forums
So if you look at it that way, he left so he wouldn't get himself banned again
Or maybe this guy's been lying the whole time about being one of the three and Bwog's taking a break today again and he'll come back tommorow and see these and be like "....Huh?!"
Offline
Lord-Sprites wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
illusionist wrote:
BWOG GOT UN-BANNED YESTERDAY
he posted, disappeared, and then we have Santa.Like a two-day ban? Whaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Edit: Okay, it was two days.BWOG, yesterday wrote:
I think a day long ban was long enough for me
If one day's long enough for him, why would he leave?
He only left the forums. He was originally only banned because of the forums
So if you look at it that way, he left so he wouldn't get himself banned again
Or maybe this guy's been lying the whole time about being one of the three and Bwog's taking a break today again and he'll come back tommorow and see these and be like "....Huh?!"
I said that Santa might be someone totally different...
Offline
somelia wrote:
Lord-Sprites wrote:
cocoanut wrote:
illusionist wrote:
BWOG GOT UN-BANNED YESTERDAY
he posted, disappeared, and then we have Santa.Like a two-day ban? Whaaaaaaaaaaaat?
Edit: Okay, it was two days.
If one day's long enough for him, why would he leave?He only left the forums. He was originally only banned because of the forums
So if you look at it that way, he left so he wouldn't get himself banned again
Or maybe this guy's been lying the whole time about being one of the three and Bwog's taking a break today again and he'll come back tommorow and see these and be like "....Huh?!"I said that Santa might be someone totally different...
![]()
Yes, me too. I don't know what you're implying with that smiley
Offline
Lord-Sprites wrote:
somelia wrote:
Lord-Sprites wrote:
He only left the forums. He was originally only banned because of the forums
So if you look at it that way, he left so he wouldn't get himself banned again
Or maybe this guy's been lying the whole time about being one of the three and Bwog's taking a break today again and he'll come back tommorow and see these and be like "....Huh?!"I said that Santa might be someone totally different...
![]()
Yes, me too. I don't know what you're implying with that smiley
I meant:
I said that it could be BWOG, and it could be someone different.
They said that it had to be BWOG and didn't listen to me. Now you are proving my point, and I am rolling my eyes at the rest of the crew.
NOW do you get me?
Offline
somelia wrote:
Lord-Sprites wrote:
somelia wrote:
I said that Santa might be someone totally different...![]()
Yes, me too. I don't know what you're implying with that smiley
I meant:
I said that it could be BWOG, and it could be someone different.
They said that it had to be BWOG and didn't listen to me. Now you are proving my point, and I am rolling my eyes at the rest of the crew.
NOW do you get me?
Yes. My apologies for the misunderstanding
Offline
Lord-Sprites wrote:
somelia wrote:
Lord-Sprites wrote:
Yes, me too. I don't know what you're implying with that smileyI meant:
I said that it could be BWOG, and it could be someone different.
They said that it had to be BWOG and didn't listen to me. Now you are proving my point, and I am rolling my eyes at the rest of the crew.
NOW do you get me?Yes. My apologies for the misunderstanding
Thank you.
Offline