hmnwilson wrote:
Thanks for posting this.
What I'd like to see on the forums is a "warning meter" type system. Depending on how bad the offense is the warning meter would go up some, and once it reaches a certain point you get blocked for only a few days to a week. They would gradually get longer from there, so there would be no three-month blocks on a first offense (see MidnightWarrior's post).
I think something like that would work. Suggestions are welcome.
That's an interesting idea.... It's been really helpful to read some responses to this and similar threads that suggest that Scratchers really don't understand why and in what situations we block accounts. No wonder there is a lot of fear and confusion!
re: 3 month block: I think you mean 1 month block, and in this particular situation, it was not a first offense, or without warning.
I should say a little more: There are only a few Scratch Team available to moderate the community. If we unblock someone once after they promise to be respectful, and then they break that promise, how can we trust them? How can you tell if they really do want to change, or if they are just asking to be unblocked so they can say more mean stuff, or troll? It's a tough problem - one that I hope we can find better solutions to someday. But for now, if we don't feel strongly that we can trust someone who has lied to us in the past, we can't afford to keep unblocking them.
Offline
DaGamez wrote:
I think you should unban lonwol.
He promised he wouldn't ever, EVER swear again, and he's like an idol on scratch. Everyone loves lonwol... He's epic xD
Can't you give lonwol a second chance? I mean, the word he said was almost a compliment xD It's just a hello without the o. And in school they teach you about that place xD
Well, I don't believe in god or anything, so I don't really know if that's very offensive to christians who believe.
We certainly don't encourage the use of the word "hell," but no one has been blocked just for using that word. And we would definitely prefer that people didn't use it because some people do find it offensive.
re: Second chance: Everyone who has been blocked is entitled to request to be unblocked. That's why the page Scratchers see when banned includes a contact us form on it. If we deny that request (rarely, especially if it's the first time they've been blocked), we will always explain why. But making additional accounts and disrespectful posts is not a good way to ask to get unblocked - it just makes the block last longer.
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
hmnwilson wrote:
Thanks for posting this.
What I'd like to see on the forums is a "warning meter" type system. Depending on how bad the offense is the warning meter would go up some, and once it reaches a certain point you get blocked for only a few days to a week. They would gradually get longer from there, so there would be no three-month blocks on a first offense (see MidnightWarrior's post).
I think something like that would work. Suggestions are welcome.That's an interesting idea.... It's been really helpful to read some responses to this and similar threads that suggest that Scratchers really don't understand why and in what situations we block accounts. No wonder there is a lot of fear and confusion!
re: 3 month block: I think you mean 1 month block, and in this particular situation, it was not a first offense, or without warning.![]()
I should say a little more: There are only a few Scratch Team available to moderate the community. If we unblock someone once after they promise to be respectful, and then they break that promise, how can we trust them? How can you tell if they really do want to change, or if they are just asking to be unblocked so they can say more mean stuff, or troll? It's a tough problem - one that I hope we can find better solutions to someday. But for now, if we don't feel strongly that we can trust someone who has lied to us in the past, we can't afford to keep unblocking them.![]()
Oops, misread it as three months... and I guess I just assumed everything else. D:
And you're right about that last part. I might have to re-think this...
Last edited by hmnwilson (2010-05-03 19:25:40)
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
DaGamez wrote:
I think you should unban lonwol.
He promised he wouldn't ever, EVER swear again, and he's like an idol on scratch. Everyone loves lonwol... He's epic xD
Can't you give lonwol a second chance? I mean, the word he said was almost a compliment xD It's just a hello without the o. And in school they teach you about that place xD
Well, I don't believe in god or anything, so I don't really know if that's very offensive to christians who believe.We certainly don't encourage the use of the word "hell," but no one has been blocked just for using that word. And we would definitely prefer that people didn't use it because some people do find it offensive.
re: Second chance: Everyone who has been blocked is entitled to request to be unblocked. That's why the page Scratchers see when banned includes a contact us form on it. If we deny that request (rarely, especially if it's the first time they've been blocked), we will always explain why. But making additional accounts and disrespectful posts is not a good way to ask to get unblocked - it just makes the block last longer.
He did a second account to ask you mods to unblock him because he thought nobody actually read the contact us messages... xD
Offline
DaGamez wrote:
He did a second account to ask you mods to unblock him because he thought nobody actually read the contact us messages... xD
Wow - everyone seems to think that! I guess it's because it's true of most websites these days. Not ours though - we read every one, and respond to those that are reasonable and respectful. There are situations when we stop responding - but that's only after sending a message to explain why (i.e. if someone has already been blocked several times, and we can no longer trust them we say so and explain that we won't be responding to anymore messages.)
So if we haven't responded to a contact us message: please be patient! There is always lots to do, so sometimes it may take us to a day or two to respond.
Offline
The Terms of Use are fair... why do people sometimes break them? Is it for popularity or something?
It seems just weird. People might even KNOW they will get banned for doing or saying something, and yet they do it. People who don't, well, I guess that's a different story.
Offline
Lightnin wrote:
DaGamez wrote:
He did a second account to ask you mods to unblock him because he thought nobody actually read the contact us messages... xD
Wow - everyone seems to think that! I guess it's because it's true of most websites these days. Not ours though - we read every one, and respond to those that are reasonable and respectful. There are situations when we stop responding - but that's only after sending a message to explain why (i.e. if someone has already been blocked several times, and we can no longer trust them we say so and explain that we won't be responding to anymore messages.)
So if we haven't responded to a contact us message: please be patient! There is always lots to do, so sometimes it may take us to a day or two to respond.![]()
I hope you eventually do unban lonwol!
If you do, tell me and I'll notify him.
Offline
Sounds good
I've never seen anyone banned or any rules about banning that seemed unreasonable.
I think part of the confusion is because people don't realize that anyone who is banned can always discuss the ban with the Scratch Team and reach a consensus. There is always room for a second chance (assuming the offense was not horrible). People seem to think the Scratch Team bans without thought.
Offline
If you use an IP ban for a first offense (which I know rarely happens) will you be able to access the Scratch Team, assuming the offender doesn't know their e-mail.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
If you use an IP ban for a first offense (which I know rarely happens) will you be able to access the Scratch Team, assuming the offender doesn't know their e-mail.
Well lonwol has told me some things to post.
1. His second account was not to ask to be unbanned. It was to say bye.
2. He ussually gets IP ban. Even the first time he was banned.
3. DaGamez he'll know when he gets unbanned.
Offline
soupoftomato wrote:
If you use an IP ban for a first offense (which I know rarely happens) will you be able to access the Scratch Team, assuming the offender doesn't know their e-mail.
Yep, the IP ban page is basically the same - with a contact form built in.
Offline
The-return wrote:
soupoftomato wrote:
If you use an IP ban for a first offense (which I know rarely happens) will you be able to access the Scratch Team, assuming the offender doesn't know their e-mail.
Well lonwol has told me some things to post.
1. His second account was not to ask to be unbanned. It was to say bye.
2. He ussually gets IP ban. Even the first time he was banned.
3. DaGamez he'll know when he gets unbanned.
This is not the way to deal with this issue. Please tell lonwol to use the contact us form, and be patient. It's interesting that you noted that this was not the first ban....
From where we are standing, these issues comes down to trust: We can't afford to spend all of our time banning and unbanning, and frankly for all of us that's the least interesting or fun part of working with the Scratch Team. If someone has agreed to follow the Terms of Use, and then been disrespectful or created additional accounts to be disrespectful- how can we take them at their word when they promise to change?
Offline
It's sad how so many Scratchers are ignorant of other people's feelings and rights.
I once said in a thread to respect others, and one person (not saying names) basically said "what" at the be respectful line and continued to be disrespectful.
I've been on Scratch since 2007, and the amount of disunity in the community just sort of surprises me.
Like I said before, anybody can do what they want to with scratch, it is their own right.
Last edited by mkolpnji (2010-05-03 21:47:35)
Offline
Survivorduck wrote:
hmnwilson wrote:
Thanks for posting this.
What I'd like to see on the forums is a "warning meter" type system. Depending on how bad the offense is the warning meter would go up some, and once it reaches a certain point you get blocked for only a few days to a week. They would gradually get longer from there, so there would be no three-month blocks on a first offense (see MidnightWarrior's post).
I think something like that would work. Suggestions are welcome.I like that idea!
![]()
Ditto
Offline
mkolpnji wrote:
It's sad how so many Scratchers are ignorant of other people's feelings and rights.
I once said in a thread to respect others, and one person (not saying names) basically said "what" at the be respectful line and continued to be disrespectful.
I've been on Scratch since 2007, and the amount of disunity in the community just sort of surprises me.
Like I said before, anybody can do what they want to with scratch, it is their own right.
Sing with me!
We shall overcome! We shall overcome! We shall overcome someday! Ohh, deep in my heart, I do believe, we shall overcome, someday.
Offline
somelia wrote:
We shall overcome! We shall overcome! We shall overcome someday! Ohh, deep in my heart, I do believe, we shall overcome, someday.
Or we can copy TI:
'Hey, never mind what haters say, ignore 'em 'till they fade away. Amazing they ungrateful after all the game I gave away'
Offline
Cool, I am not banned.
I am glad though that the Scratch Team is making an effort to stop the Programming-Art war, as it was getting very annoying. It live and let live on Scratch, and they were trying to control it. Besides, it was cloggin up Miscellanoius with useless thread.
I personally like the idea of votes, and a karma point system. Its beeen discussed before...
Offline
TheSaint wrote:
Besides, it was cloggin up Miscellanoius with useless thread.
![]()
Enough that I could have made a sweater from it.
Once there were eight or so on the first page...
And half were closed.
Offline
Your topic post is brilliant, Lightnin!
I think this should be stickied so it won't be bumped down.
Offline
Why has the scratch team been mean and banned tons of my favorite scratchers?
Offline
rocket101 wrote:
Why has the scratch team been mean and banned tons of my favorite scratchers?
There not mean. They are protecting the Scratch community.
My site Offline
rocket101 wrote:
Why has the scratch team been mean and banned tons of my favorite scratchers?
Whether you realize it or not, that person has given the Scratch Team a reason to ban them. The Scratch Team isn't mean, more-so the person they ban was at one point.
Offline
coolstuff wrote:
I feel that a way to halt the confusion, at least for a little bit, would be to tell them up-front why they were banned.
In most cases, that's simple to do - so we do it. In some, as in the recent situation, it's a bit trickier. It's not quite as easy as "You are banned for saying bad words!" or something like that. It's more like you have been blocked for slowly getting more disrespectful of certain groups of Scratchers over time, and fanning flames. So there are some cases when we block Scratchers with a simple message in order to have a longer conversation with them in which we explain why they were blocked.
Offline